Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation

Abstract

Within volunteered geographic information (VGI), citizen science stands out as a class of activities that require special attention and analysis. Citizen science is likely to be the longest running of VGI activities, with some projects showing continuous effort over a century. In addition, many projects are characterised by a genuine element of volunteering and contribution of information for the benefit of human knowledge and science. They are also tasks where data quality and uncertainty come to the fore when evaluating the validity of the results. This chapter provides an overview of citizen science in the context of VGI – hence the focus on geographic citizen science. This chapter highlights the historical context of citizen science and its more recent incarnation. It also covers some of the cultural and conceptual challenges that citizen science faces and the resulting limitation on the level of engagement. By drawing parallels with the Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) literature, the chapter offers a framework for participation in citizen science and concludes with the suggestion that a more participatory mode of citizen science is possible.

References

  1. Anderson, D. P., Cobb, J., Korpela, E., Lebofsky, M., & Werthimer, D. (2002). SETI@home: An experiment in public-resource computing. Communications of the ACM, 45(11), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniou, B., Haklay, M., & Morley, J. (2010). Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica, The Journal of Geospatial Information, Technology and Practice, 64(1), 99–110.Google Scholar
  3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the America Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC (2006). Citizen science, Radio 4 series. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/citizenscience.shtml. Accessed June 2011.
  5. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, H., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. In A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, DC (Technical Report).Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, R. L., & Wilson, G. A. (1998). Rethinking environmental management. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryson, B. (2004). A short history of almost everything. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  8. Budhathoki, N. R., Nedovic-Budic, Z., & Bruce, B. (2010). An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica, The Journal of Geospatial Information, Technology and Practice, 64(1), 11–26.Google Scholar
  9. Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? Bioscience, 58(3), 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of producers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4, 332–358.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12(2), 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/. Accessed January 5, 2012.
  12. Couclelis, H. (2003). The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS, 7(2), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuff, D., Hansen, M., & Kang, J. (2007). Urban sensing: Out of the woods. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 51(3), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered Geographic Information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghose, R. (2001). Use of information technology for community empowerment: Transforming geographic information systems into community information systems. Transactions in GIS, 5(2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Girres, J.-F., & Touya, G. (2010). Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14(4), 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grey, F. (2009). The age of citizen cyberscience, CERN Courier, April 29, 2009. http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/38718. Accessed July 2011.
  20. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is OpenStreetMap information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets for London and the rest of England. Environment and Planning B, 37, 682–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haklay, M., Francis, L., & Whitaker, C. (2008a). Citizens tackle noise pollution. GIS Professional, August issue.Google Scholar
  22. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008b). Web mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, 3, 2011–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holling, C. S. (1998). Two cultures of ecology. Conservation Ecology 2(2), 4. http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art4/. Accessed January 5, 2012.
  24. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine,June 2006.Google Scholar
  25. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., Popovic, Z., Jaskolski, M., & Baker, D. (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. Published online September 18, 2011. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2119.
  28. King, J. L., & Kraemer, L. K. (1993). Models, facts, and the policy process: The political ecology of estimated truth. In M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, & L. T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental modeling with GIS (pp. 353–360). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., Raddick, M. J., Nichol, R. C., Szalay, A., Andreescu, D., Murray, P., & van den Berg, J. (2008). Galaxy zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacKerron, G. (2011). mappiness.org.uk. In LSE Research Day 2011: The Early Career Researcher, May 26, 2011, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  32. Maisonneuve, N., Stevens, M., & Ochab, B. (2010). Participatory noise pollution monitoring using mobile phones. Information Polity, 15(1–2), 51–71.Google Scholar
  33. Migurski, M. (2009). Walking papers. walking-papers.org. Accessed 5 January 2012.Google Scholar
  34. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  35. Nov, O., Arazy, O., & Anderson, D. (2011). Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. In Proceedings of the AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011), Barcelona, Spain, July 2011.Google Scholar
  36. Pain, R. (2004). Social geography: Participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(5), 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, D., & Barnett, C. (2009). Something in the air: Civic science and contentious environmental politics in post-apartheid South Africa. Geoforum, 40(3), 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation and geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stilgoe, J. (2009). Citizen scientists – Reconnecting science with civil society. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, A. J. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Westphal, A. J., von Korff, J., Anderson, D. P., Alexander, A., Betts, B., Brownlee, D. E., Butterworth, A. L., Craig, N., Gainsforth, Z., Mendez, B., See, T., Snead, C. J., Srama, R., Tsitrin, S., Warren, J., & Zolensky, M. (2006). Stardust@home: Virtual microscope validation and first results. In 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, League City, Texas, March 2006, Abstract no. 2225.Google Scholar
  44. Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to Crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Proceedings of the Forty-fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS-44), Koloa, HI, January 2011.Google Scholar
  45. Wilderman, C. C. (2007). Models of community science: Design lessons from the field. In C. McEver, R. Bonney, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, K. Rosenberg, & J. L. Shirk (Eds.), Citizen science toolkit conference. Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.Google Scholar
  46. Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., & Stilgoe, J. (2005). The public value of science or how to ensure that science really matters. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  47. World Meteorological Organisation. (2001). Volunteers for weather, climate and water. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation. WMO No. 919.Google Scholar
  48. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2). doi:10.2202/1948–4682.1069.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations