Prospects for VGI Research and the Emerging Fourth Paradigm
This concluding chapter reflects on some of the core themes that crosscut the contributed chapters, and further outlines some of the stimulating and significant relationships between volunteered geographic information (VGI) and the discipline of geography. We argue that future progress in VGI research depends in large part on building strong linkages with a diversity of geographic scholarship. We situate VGI research in geography’s core concerns with space and place and offer several ways of addressing persistent challenges of quality assurance in VGI. We develop an argument for further research on the heterogeneous social relations through which VGI is produced and their implications for participation, power, and collective or civic action. The final two sections, closely related, position VGI as part of a shift toward hybrid epistemologies and potentially a fourth paradigm of data-intensive inquiry across the sciences.
KeywordsGeographic Information System Civic Engagement Volunteer Geographic Information Geographic Knowledge Geographic World
- Bartscherer, T., & Coover, R. (Eds.). (2011). Switching codes: Thinking through digital technology in the humanities and the arts. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Berry, D. M. (Ed.). (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Bodenhamer, D., Corrigan, J., & Harris, T. (Eds.). (2011). The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Budhathoki, N., Nedovic-Budic, Z., & Bruce, B. (2010). An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica, 64(1), 11–26.Google Scholar
- Burrough, P. A., & Frank, A. U. (Eds.). (1996). Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Bristol: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Corbett, J. (2011, April 13). The revolution will not be geotagged: Exploring the role of the participatory Geoweb in advocacy and supporting social change. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Dear, M., Ketchum, J., Luria, S., & Richardson, D. (2011). GeoHumanities: Art, history, and text at the edge of place. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Elwood, S. (2009). Mixed methods: Thinking, doing, and asking in multiple ways. In D. DeLyser, M. Crang, L. McDowell, S. Aitken, & S. Herbert (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 94–113). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- ESRI. (2010). The latest in citizen engagement. ESRI advertising supplement. http://media2.govtech.com/documents/PCIO10_ESRI_V.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2011.
- Foresman, T. W. (Ed.). (1998). The history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the pioneers. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Ghonim, W. (2012). Revolution 2.0: The power of the people is greater than the people in power. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Goodchild, M. F. (2010). Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
- Goodchild, M. F., & Gopal, S. (Eds.). (1988). Accuracy of spatial databases. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. (2007). eScience – A transformed scientific method. Presentation made to the NRC-CSTB. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/gray/talks/NRC-CSTB_eScience.ppt. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
- Grira, J., Bedard, Y., & Roche, S. (2010). Spatial data uncertainty in the VGI world: Going from consumer to producer. Geomatica, 64(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
- Guptill, S. C., & Morrison, J. L. (Eds.). (1995). Elements of spatial data quality. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Halevy, A., Norvig, P., & Pereira, P. (2009). The unreasonable effectiveness of data. IEEE Intelligent Systems, March/April, 8–12.Google Scholar
- Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (Eds.). (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond: Microsoft Research.Google Scholar
- Higginbotham, S. (2011). Big data: Science’s microscope of the 21st century. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/big-data-sciences-microscope-of-the-21st-century-11092011.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
- Hilbert, D. (1900). Mathematical problems. Göttinger Nachrichten, 253–297 (original work in German; translated into English in 1902).Google Scholar
- Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2008). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2009). Grounded visualization and scale: A recursive examination of community spaces. In M. Cope & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp. 95–114). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lieverouw, L. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Maling, D. H. (1989). Measurements from maps: Principles and methods of cartometry. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/MGI/Research/Technology_and_Innovation/Big_data_The_next_frontier_for_innovation. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
- Montello, D. R., Goodchild, M. F., Gottsegen, J., & Fohl, P. (2003). Where’s downtown? Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(2–3), 185–204.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Poore, B. (2011, April 13). VGI/PGI: Virtual community or bowling alone? Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
- Rose, G. (2000). Hybridity. In R. J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M. Watts (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 364–365). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: How technology makes consumers into collaborators. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Sieber, R. (2000). GIS implementation in the grassroots. URISA Journal, 12(1), 15–51.Google Scholar
- Sieber, R. (2011, April 13). Volunteered geographic information: Motivation or empowerment? Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- The U.S. National Science Foundation. (2011). Rebuilding the mosaic: Fostering research in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences at the National Science Foundation in the next decade. www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/nsf11086/nsf11086.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
- Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Warf, B., & Arias, S. (Eds.). (2009). The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Weinberger, D. (2012). Too big to know: Rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar