Advertisement

Volunteered Geographic Information, Actor-Network Theory, and Severe-Storm Reports

  • Mark H. PalmerEmail author
  • Scott Kraushaar

Abstract

In this chapter, we will use actor-network theory to describe a decentralized, heterogeneous storm-spotting and storm-chasing network in the United States, which connects human-sensor observations in the field with operational meteorologists in the center of calculation and with television media as the recipients and public distributors of official severe-weather watches and warnings. In the first section, we present actor-network theory as a conceptual framework for describing the co-construction of society and technology and the centering processes associated with scientific laboratories and government agencies. In the second section, we demonstrate the use of actor-network theory (ANT) through a descriptive case study of the storm-spotter and storm-chaser network, which encompasses both decentralized and centralized processes. Finally, we analyze the centering processes that the National Weather Service (NWS) uses to mobilize, stabilize, and combine VGI storm reports with their existing technologies.

Keywords

Geographic Information System Severe Weather Volunteer Geographic Information Human Sensor Doppler Weather Radar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bates, F. C. (1962). Severe local storm forecasts and warnings and the general public. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 43, 288–291.Google Scholar
  2. Bingham, N. (1996). Object-ions: From technological determinisms towards geographies of relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishr, M., & Mantelas, L. (2008). A trust and reputation model for filtering and classification of knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal, 72, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bluestein, H. B. (1999). A history of severe-storm-intercept field programs. Weather and Forecasting, 14, 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brice, T., & Pieper, C. (2009). Using Twitter to receive storm reports. Available online at: ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/163543.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb2012.
  6. Brooks, H., Doswell, C., III, & Kay, M. (2003). Climatological estimates of local daily tornado probability for the United States. Weather and Forecasting, 18(4), 626–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess, J., Clark, J., & Harrison, C. M. (2000). Knowledges in action: An actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics, 35(1), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 132–161). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory: The market test. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network and after (pp. 181–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cantillon, H., & Bristow, R. (2001). Tornado chasing: An introduction to risk tourism opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2000 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 234–239). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.Google Scholar
  11. Crampton, J. (2010). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, G. (2000). Narrating the natural history unit: Institutional ordering and spatial strategies. Geoforum, 31(4), 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Doswell, C. A., III, Moller, A. R., & Brooks, H. E. (1999). Storm spotting and public awareness since the first tornado forecasts of 1948. Weather and Forecasting, 14, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galaway, J. G. (1985). J. P. Finley: The first severe storms forecaster (Part 1). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 66, 1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gartner, G., Bennett, D., & Morita, T. (2007). Toward ubiquitous cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golden, J. H., & Morgan, B. J. (1972). The NSSL/Notre Dame tornado intercept program, spring 1972. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 53, 1178–1180.Google Scholar
  18. Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodchild, M. F. (2007b). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructures in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructure Research, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  20. Goodchild, M. F. (2008). Commentary: Whither VGI? GeoJournal, 72, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haklay, M. (2010, Sept). Geographical citizen science – Clash of cultures and new opportunities. In Proceedings of the workshop on the role of volunteered geographic information in advancing science. GIScience 2010, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, C. (2004). How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey, F. (2001). Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration. URISA Journal, 13(1), 29–37.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, F. (2007, April). Nowhere is everywhere? Towards postmodernist ubiquitous computing based geographic communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (2004). The imbrication of geography and technology: The social construction of geographic information systems. In S. D. Brunn, S. L. Cutter, & J. W. Harrington (Eds.), Geography and technology (pp. 65–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Hinchliffe, S. (1996). Technology, power, and space-the means and ends of geographies of technology. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 659–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hitchings, R. (2003). People, plants and performance: On actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social and Cultural Geography, 4(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirsch, S. (2002). John Wesley Powell and the mapping of the Colorado Plateau, 1869–1879: Survey science, geographic solutions, and the economy of environmental values. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(4), 645–661.Google Scholar
  30. Kirsch, S., & Mitchell, D. (2004). The nature of things: Dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode, 36(4), 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kraushaar, S. (2011). Ground truth: Volunteered geographic information and storm chasing. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, E. (2000). Actor-networks and implementation: Examples from conservation GIS in Ecuador. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(8), 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mummidi, L., & Krumm, J. (2008). Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal, 72, 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murdoch, J. (1995). Actor-networks and the evolution of economic forms: Combining description and explanation in theories of regulation, flexible specialization, and networks. Environment and Planning A, 27, 731–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murdoch, J. (1997a). Inhuman/non-human: Actor-network theory and the prospects for a non-dualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 731–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murdoch, J. (1997b). Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murdoch, J. (2006). Poststructuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL). (2011). VORTEX2 background. http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/projects/vortex2/background.php. Accessed 12 Apr 2011.
  42. NOAA. (2011a). What is skywarn? http://www.nws.noaa.gov/skywarn/. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  43. NOAA. (2011b). Weather spotter’s field guide. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/brochures/SGJune6–11.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.Google Scholar
  44. NOAA. (2011c). America’s weather enterprise: Protecting lives, livelihoods, and your way of life. http://www.weather.gov/om/brochures/Citizen_Scientist.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2011.
  45. NOAA. (2011d). Skywarn Storm Spotters. http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Media%20&%20PR/EmergencyRadio_org/Skywarn.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2011.
  46. Palmer, M. (2009). Engaging with indigital geographic information networks. Futures, 41, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer, M. (2012). Cartographic encounters at the BIA GIS center of calculation. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, M. H., Stevenson, S., & Zaras, D. S. (2000, Jan). Student evaluations of the Oklahoma Weather Center REU Program: 1995, 1998, and 1999. Ninth symposium on education, Long Beach, CA. American Meteorological Society, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
  49. Panelli, R. (2010). More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertson, D. (1999). Beyond twister: A geography of recreational storm chasing on the southern plains. Geographical Review, 89(4), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, R. G. (2003). World city actor-networks. Progress in Human Geography, 27(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spotter Network. (2011). http://www.spotternetwork.org. Accessed 15 Apr 2011.
  53. Thrift, N. J. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Thrift, N. J. (2000). Actor-network theory. In R. J. Johnson, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M. Watts (Eds.), Dictionary of human geography (pp. 4–6). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Vasquez, T. (2008). Storm chasing handbook (2nd ed.). Garland: Weather Graphics Technologies.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, S. (2007). Application for GIS specialist meeting. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/participants.html. Accessed 6 Sept 2010.
  57. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007a). The creative reconstruction of the internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38, 1322–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007b). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 466–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations