Science Education for Diversity and Informal Learning

  • Loran Carleton Parker
  • Gerald H. KrockoverEmail author
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 8)


Research regarding learning science in informal settings has expanded dramatically in the past 20 years. Studies have reported informal science learning in a variety of environments such as museums, science centers, zoos, and aquarium settings. The research literature is rich with detailed descriptions of learning as it occurs in informal contexts. Many conceptual frameworks are reported through which to view science learning along with conceptual frameworks to determine questions that can be explored. Research has reported results for individual, small group, large group, comprehensive, and generalized informal settings. This chapter reviews the research literature base for learning science in informal settings, provides examples of interesting research studies, and concludes with the impact of science education informal learning related to cultural and diversity issues.


  1. Afonso, A. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Educational value of different types of exhibits in an interactive science and technology center. Science Education, 91(6), 967–987. doi: 10.1002/sce.20220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. Accessed 17 Dec 2007.
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science education. Accessed 3 June 2012.
  4. Ash, D. (2002). Negotiations of thematic conversations about biology. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 357–400). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Ash, D. (2003). Reflective scientific sense-making dialogue in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in the science. Science Education, 88, 855–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ash, D. (2004). How families use questions at Dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator, 47, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2006). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, P. (2009). Informal science learning. The Science Teacher, 76(3), 14–15.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  10. Borun, M. (2002). Object-based learning and family groups. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 245–260). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Botelho, A., & Morais, A. M. (2006). Students-exhibit interaction at a science center. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 987–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brody, M., Tomkiewicz, W., & Graves, J. (2002). Park visitors’ understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1119–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57–74). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2010). The 95 percent solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. [Article]. American Scientist, 98(6), 486+.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2011). Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1002/tea.20394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk, J. H., Heimlich, J., & Bronnenkant, K. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitors’ meaning-making. Curator, 51(1), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  18. Gilbert, J., & Priest, M. (1997). Models and discourse: A primary school visit to a museum. Science Education, 81, 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 3–31). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Hohenstein, J., & Tran, L. U. (2007). Use of questions in exhibit labels to generate explanatory conversation among science museum visitors. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1557–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins, E. W. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W. M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2006). Grandparents speak: Museum conversations across the generations. Curator, 49(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorimer, A. (2007). The Cockpit’s empty chair: Education through appropriating alienation at a Chicago Technology Museum. Teachers College Record, 109(7), 1707–1724.Google Scholar
  26. Parker, L. C. (2009). The use of zoo exhibits by family groups to learn science. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70-11, 4231A.Google Scholar
  27. Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Deinstitutionalizing school science: Implications of a strong view of situated cognition. Research in Science Education, 27, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schauble, L., Leinhardt, G., & Martin, L. (1997). A framework for organizing a cumulative research agenda in informal learning contexts. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2&3), 3–8.Google Scholar
  32. Simpson, J. S., & Parsons, E. C. (2009). African American perspectives and informal science educational experiences. Science Education, 93(2), 293–321. doi: 10.1002/sce.20300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1997). Seeing Tornado: How video traces mediate visitor understandings of (natural?) phenomena in a science museum. Science Education, 81, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2000). Conversations of family and primary school groups at robotic dinosaur exhibits in a museum: What do they talk about? International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 739–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94(3), 478–505. doi: 10.1002/sce.20374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discovery Learning Research CenterPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, College of SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations