Students’ Perceptions of Apparent Contradictions Between Science and Religion: Creation Is Only the Beginning

  • Berry BillingsleyEmail author
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 8)


The potential for conflict between science and religion in pupils’ education and thinking runs deeper than commonly perceived. Those forming their understanding of the situation by drawing on the picture presented in the media would likely conclude that instances of tension and conflict are confined to science lessons on origins and affect only those pupils who believe that the story of Creation describes six literal days.

While the question of how to deliver teaching on origins is rightly a concern, research suggests that pupils’ perceptions of what science tells us have the potential to interact with a much broader set of religious beliefs.

In this chapter I draw on studies of young people’s perceptions of the relationships between science and religion to highlight some of the characteristics of their thinking when there is the potential for individuals to perceive that science and religion are opposed. I then argue that social constraints operate in science classrooms which can have the effect of masking the nature of pupils’ perceptions of the relationships between science and religion from teachers. To close the chapter, I argue that it is important that teachers provide opportunities for pupils to see that a religious worldview is not necessarily scientifically untenable.


  1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, D. (2008). Creation or evolution: Do we have to choose? Oxford: Monarch.Google Scholar
  4. Astley, J., & Francis, L. J. (2010). Promoting positive attitudes towards science and religion among sixth-form pupils: Dealing with scientism and creationism. British Journal of Religious Education, 32(3), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbour, I. (2000). When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers or partners? San Francisco: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  7. Bauser, J., & Poole, M. (2002). Science education and religious education: Possible links? School Science Review, 85(311), 117–124.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 47–69). London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, R. J. (1996). God and the biologist: Faith at the frontiers of science. Leicester: Apollos.Google Scholar
  11. Billingsley, B. (2004). Ways of approaching the apparent contradictions between science and religion. Hobart: University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  12. Billingsley, B., Taber, K. S., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2012). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion – A preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, published online. Scholar
  13. Brooke, J. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, J. (2009). Socio-constructivist and socio-cultural lenses on collaborative peer talk in a secondary mathematics classroom. Paper presented at The British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.Google Scholar
  16. Fawns, R., & Sadler, J. (1996). Managing student learning in classrooms: Reframing classroom research. Research in Science Education, 26(2), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis, L., Gibson, H., & Fulljames, P. (1990). Attitude towards Christianity, Creationism, Scientism and Interest in Science among 11–15 year olds. British Journal of Religious Education, 13(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fulljames, P. (1996). Science, creation and Christianity: A further look. In L. Francis, W. Kay, & W. Campbell (Eds.), Research in religious education (pp. 257–266). Leominster: Gracewing.Google Scholar
  19. Fulljames, P., & Stolberg, T. (2000). Consonance, assimilation or correlation?: Science and religion courses in higher education. Science & Christian Belief, 12(1), 35–46.Google Scholar
  20. Fulljames, P., Gibson, H., & Francis, L. (1991). Creationism, Scientism, Christianity and Science: A study in adolescent attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fysh, R., & Lucas, K. B. (1998). Science and religion: Acknowledging student beliefs. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44(2), 60–68.Google Scholar
  22. Hogan, C. J. (1998). The little book of the big bang: A cosmic primer. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jegede, O. (1997). School science and the development of scientific culture: A review of contemporary science education in Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jegede, O., & Okebukola, P. A. (1991). The effect of instruction on socio-cultural beliefs hindering the learning of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loughran, J., & Derry, N. (1997). Researching teaching for understanding: The students’ perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth, W. M., & Alexander, T. (1997). The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011a). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011b). To what extent do pupils perceive science to be inconsistent with religious faith? An exploratory survey of 13–14 year-old English pupils. Science Education International, 22(2), 99–118.Google Scholar
  29. Tierney, J., Sinkie, E., & Gregory, J. (Eds.). (2005). Education yearbook 2005/2206. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  30. Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The ‘grammar’ of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations