Advertisement

Religion in Science Education

  • Michael J. ReissEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 8)

Abstract

Science education for diversity has long striven to take account of issues to do with gender, socio-economic class, ethnicity and disability. However, it has traditionally made rather less effort to consider issues to do with religious faith. Yet issues to do with religion are becoming increasingly important in school science lessons and certain other educational settings, such as science museums. I examine two possible circumstances where one might wish matters of religion to be included within the teaching of science: when teaching about the nature of science and when teaching about evolution. With regard to the nature of science, considering religion is useful simply for helping learners better understand why certain things come under the purview of science and others don’t. With regard to evolution, religious belief is a major reason why many people reject evolution. One can teach evolution in a way that is true to science yet respectful of student who, for religious reasons, feel unable to accept the validity of evolution.

Keywords

Science Education Science Teacher Science Classroom Giant Panda Intelligent Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atkins, P. (2011). On being: A scientist’s exploration of the great questions of existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science: The Gifford Lectures 1989–1991 (Vol. 1). London: SCM.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, T. (2004). Pasts beyond memory: Evolution, museums, colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brickhouse, N. W., & Letts, W. J., IV. (1998). The problem of dogmatism in science education. In J. T. Sears & J. C. Carper (Eds.), Curriculum, religion, and public education: Conversations for an enlarging public square (pp. 221–230). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating, revised ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. California Department of Education (1990). Science framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  8. DCSF. (2007). Guidance on creationism and intelligent design. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20071204131026/, http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890. Accessed 22 Jan 2012.
  9. Jones, A., McKim, A., & Reiss, M. (Eds.). (2010). Ethics in the science and technology classroom: A new approach to teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  10. Kingsley, C. (1859, November 18). Letter to Charles Darwin. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2534. Accessed 29 Jan 2012.
  11. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawes, C. (2009). Faith and Darwin: Harmony, conflict, or confusion? London: Theos.Google Scholar
  14. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & H. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Meyer, S. C. (2009). Signature in the cell: DNA and the evidence for Intelligent Design. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In L. Jones & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism (pp. 11–29). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  21. Popper, K. R. (1934/1972). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  22. Reiss, M. J. (2000a). On suffering and meaning: An evolutionary perspective. Modern Believing, 41(2), 39–46.Google Scholar
  23. Reiss, M. (2000b). Teaching science in a multicultural, multi-faith society. In J. Sears & P. Sorensen (Eds.), Issues in the teaching of science (pp. 16–22). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  24. Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reiss, M. J. (2013). Beliefs and the value of evidence. In J. K. Gilbert & S. M. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 148–161). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, M. (2007). Rethinking evolution in the museum: Envisioning African origins. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors’ search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1026–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yearley, S. (2005). Making sense of science: Understanding the social study of science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations