Abstract
A Chinese proverb observes that women ‘hold up half the sky’, yet often in science education we have ignored the knowledge generated by feminist researchers about how females engage and participate in science. Further, science education has often failed to consider the implications from feminist critiques of science on science education. This chapter will provide a feminist perspective on who generates knowledge in science education and what knowledge is acceptable as ‘scientific’ by the field. Second, we will discuss the culture of science education and discuss whether science educators value the knowledge produced by gender and feminist researchers. In particular, we will examine the integration (or lack thereof) of gender issues into the dominant areas in science education research, such as teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, the development of students’ science knowledge through inquiry, the role of conceptual change, and teachers’ preparation and professional development programmes. Third, we will provide examples of how gender theory and feminist perspectives in science education could generate new knowledge about gender and science education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Programme for International Student Assessment.
- 2.
The four journals were International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Research in Science Education and Science Education.
- 3.
Cultural Studies of Science Education has organised a small conference focussed on sociocultural issues impacting science education for journal editors, reviewers and contributors and researchers in this area of science education.
- 4.
For example, in the United States, the ‘committee of ten’ decided that students would first study biology, then chemistry and lastly physics. Scientists in the nineteenth century introduced this ‘layer cake’ approach to the curriculum which remains dominant in the twenty-first century (DeBoer 1991).
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Andersson, K. (2010). “It’s funny that we don’t see the similarities when that’s what we’re aiming for” – Visualizing and challenging teachers’ stereotypes of gender and science. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9200-7.
Andersson, K., Hussénius, A., & Gustafsson, C. (2009). Gender theory as a tool for analysing science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 336–343.
Andersson, K., & Gullberg, A. (2011). What is science in preschool and what do teachers have to know to empower the children? Culture Studies of Science Education.
Andersson, K., & Gullberg, A. (2012). What is science in preschool and what do teachers have to know to empower the children? Culture Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9439-6.
Andrée, M. (2007). Den levda läroplanen. En studie av naturorienterade undervisningspraktiker i grundskolan [The lived curriculum. A study of science classroom practices in lower secondary school]. Stockholms universitet, Studies in Educational Sciences, 97. Stockholm: HLS förlag.
Barton, A. C. (1997). Liberatory science education: Weaving connections between feminist theory and science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(2), 141–163.
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282–295.
Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002.
Bunce, D., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–927.
Carrington, B. (2002). A quintessentially feminine domain? Student teachers’ constructions of primary teaching as a career. Educational Studies, 28(3), 287–303.
Chang, D., Chang, D., & Tseng, K. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 315–331.
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ford, D. J., Fifield, S., Qian, X., Allen, D., Donham, R., & Gwekwerere, Y. (2008). Preservice K-8 teachers’ developing pedagogical context knowledge within an integrated science and education continuum. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore, MD.
Fox Keller, E. (1992). Secrets of life. Secrets of death. London: Routledge.
Fox Keller, E., & Longino, H. E. (1996). Feminism and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gannerud, E., & Rönnerman, K. (2003). Lärande och omsorg i förskola och skola: IPD-rapporter, nr 2003:03 [Learning and care in preschool and school]. Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, Göteborgs universitet.
Hammarström. (2005). Genusperspektiv på medicinen – två decenniers utveckling av medvetenheten om kön och genus inom medicinsk forskning och praktik [Gender perspective in medicine – Two decades of gender awareness development in medical research and practice]. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hirdman, Y. (1990). Genussystemet. In SOU 1990:44, Demokrati och makt i Sverige [Swedish Government Official Report, SOU 1990:44 Democracy and Power in Sweden]. Stockholm.
Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 106(22), 8801–8807.
Jelly, S. (2001). To teach the children to ask questions – And to answer them. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science: Taking the plunge (pp. 64–76). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Johannisson, K. (1994). Den mörka kontinenten: kvinnan, medicinen och fin-de-siecle [The dark continent: The woman, the medicine and the fin-de-siecle]. Stockholm: Norstedt.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company.
Martin, S., Milne, C. E., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). Eyerollers, jokers, risk-takers and turn sharks: Target students in a professional science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 819–851.
Nyström, E. (2007). Talking and taking positions. An encounter between action research and the gendered and racialised discourses of school science. Doktorsavhandlingar i pedagogiskt arbete, nr 16. Umeå universitet.
Roth, W. M. (Ed.). (2010). Re/structuring science education: Reuniting sociological and psychological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on a ‘political economy’ of sex. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Towards an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). London: Monthly Review Press.
Roberts, D. A., & Östman, L. (1998). Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
Scantlebury, K. (2010). Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education. In B. Fraser, C. McRobbie, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scantlebury, K., & Martin, S. (2010). How does she know? Re-visioning conceptual change from feminist perspectives. In W. M. Roth (Ed.), Re/structuring science education: Reuniting sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 173–186). Rotterdam: Springer.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452.
Summers, L. (2005). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science & engineering workforce. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.harvard.edu/president/speeches/summers_2005/nber.php
Swahn, E. (2008). Genusperspektiv vid kranskärlssjukdom: praktisk handledning för öppenvården [Gender perspectives in coronary heart disease: Practical guide for non-institutional care]. Södertälje: AstraZeneca.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hussénius, A., Andersson, K., Gullberg, A., Scantlebury, K. (2013). Ignoring Half the Sky: A Feminist Critique of Science Education’s Knowledge Society. In: Mansour, N., Wegerif, R. (eds) Science Education for Diversity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4562-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4563-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)