Skip to main content

Reconceptualizing a Lifelong Science Education System that Supports Diversity: The Role of Free-Choice Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Education for Diversity

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 8))

Abstract

Science educators worldwide are concerned about decreasing engagement in school science and declining enrollments in university science courses, a situation affecting societal vitality and informed democratic participation in science. I share these same concerns, however, suggesting that the primary issue is the way in which schools and universities approach diversity seems problematic. I posit that the practice of science education itself needs to become more diverse, embracing innovative approaches to learning. Findings from a US National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded retrospective study of the long-term impacts of gender-focused, free-choice science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning experiences build a case for developing a lifelong science learning system that supports diversity broadly, acknowledging the diverse places in which learning happens, the variety of forms of learning employed, and the multitude of reasons why someone might be interested and engaged in STEM. Two hundred and thirteen young women from diverse backgrounds underrepresented in STEM who had taken part in programs 10–20 years before participated in a web-based survey. Findings indicate that participation contributed to lasting impacts in interest, engagement, and participation in science communities, hobbies, and careers, influencing women’s identities and relationship to and with science. Programs also helped participants become more interested in STEM, appreciate the diversity of disciplines and practices embodied within it; build social capital, such as long-term mentors and friends who could further interest and persistence in STEM; and increased agency, influencing future careers, education, and hobbies/pursuits. Effects were particularly significant for women living in urban areas. Results reinforce free-choice science learning as a critical player in a comprehensive, whole life approach to science education reform for diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Association of Science-Technology Centers. (2010). Science center and museum statistics. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, F. S. (2004). Serious play: A comparative study of learning and engagement in hobby practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. (2011). STEM learning activity among home-educating families. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. (1992). I am what you tell me to be: Girls in science and mathematics. ASTC Newsletter, 20(4), 5, 6 & 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behavior through free-choice learning experiences: What is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (1998a). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (1998b). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (2001a). Capitalism, critical pedagogy and urban science education: An interview with Peter McLaren. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 847–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (2001b). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, A. G., & Richwine, J. (2011a). Public school teachers aren’t underpaid (Column, 11/16). USA Today, McLean, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, A. G., & Richwine, J. (2011b). Assessing the compensation of public-school teachers: A report of the Heritage Center for Data Analysis. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, S., Little, P., & Weiss, H. (2006). Demographic differences in patterns of youth out-of-school time activity participation. Journal of Youth Development, 12(1/2), 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, M., Tomkiewicz, W., & Graves, C. (2002). Park visitors’ understanding, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1119–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2011a). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–11 edition: Archivists, curators, and museum technicians.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2011b). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–11 edition: Teachers—kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. (1991). Math, science, and your daughter: What can parents do? Encouraging girls in math and science series (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 172). Newton: Women’s Educational Equity Act Publishing Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2009). The opportunity equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. www.Opportunityequation.org. Accessed on 14 May 2013.

  • Clewell, B. C., & Burger, C. J. (2002). At the crossroads: Women, science, and engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85, 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, K., Clewell, B. C., & Sevo, R. (2002). A study of the National Science Foundation’s program for women and girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. S. (1999). Why science? Women scientists and their pathways along the road less traveled. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(2), 129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. S. (2001). “Peripheral and subversive”: Women making connections and challenging the boundaries of the science community. Science Education, 85, 368–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D. (2010). A comprehensive approach to fostering the next generation of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education leaders. The New Educator, 6, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D. (in press-a). A view through another window: Free-choice science learning and generation R. In D. Zeidler (Series Ed.) & M. P. Muelle, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility): A guide to legislation and school policy in science education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D. (in press-b). Museums, families and communities: Being of value. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1998). Free-choice learning: An alternative term to informal learning? Informal Learning Environments Research Newsletter. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Optimizing out-of-school time: The role of free-choice learning. New Directions for Youth Development, 97, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2009). Learning for life: The role of free-choice learning in science education. In K. Tobin, & W.-M. Roth (Series Ed.) & W. M. Roth, & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: Handbook of research in North America (pp. 179–205). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., & Martin, L. M. W. (Eds.). (1997). Special issue of Science Education, 81(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., & Richter, J. (1995). Project ASTRO: Astronomers and teachers as partners. Science Scope, 18(6), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” Ad Hoc Committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108–111. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 81–102). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadigan, K., & Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 835–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H. (2006). The impact of visit motivation on learning: Using identity as a construct to understand the visitor experience. Curator, 49(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95% solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98, 486–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors' agendas on museum learning. Curattor, 41, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Storksdieck, M. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehrer, E., & Rennie, L. (2003). Special Informal Learning issue of Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Guest Editorial, 40(2), 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fort, D. C. (1993). The consensus. In D. C. Fort (Ed.), A hand up: Women mentoring women in science (pp. 121–144). Washington, DC: Association for Women in Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, L. (2011). How much does a historian get paid? eHow. Accessed on 21 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. (2006). The Internet as a resource for news and information about science. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. R. (2006). Relationships matter: A mixed methods evaluation of youth and adults working together as partners. Journal of Youth Development, 1(2), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1998, April). Mothers as informal science class teachers: Voluntary participation, motivation, and outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpan, C. A., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., Boehme, C., & Lynch, M. A. (1997). What did you learn outside of school today? Using structured interviews to document home and community activities related to science and technology. Science Education, 81(6), 651–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N., & Wegerif, R. (2013). Why science education for diversity? In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice. New York/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B., Kass, H., & Brouwer, W. (1990). Authentic science: A diversity of meanings. Science Education, 74, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreedy, D. (2003). Educating adult females for leadership roles in an informal science program for girls. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. (2006). Adult science learning from local television newscasts. Science Communication, 28(2), 216–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Science. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: Places, people and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R. (2011, September 28). Analyzing the mutual constitution of persons and cultural practices in STEM learning research. Center for Lifelong STEM Learning 2020 Vision Presentation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, K. (2011). E-reader ownership doubles in six months: Tablet adoption grows more slowly. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moor, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M.-W. (1995). Authentic school science. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M.-W. (1997). From everyday science to science education: How science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research. Science Education, 6, 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., & Van Eijck, M. (2010). Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span. Science Education, 94(6), 1027–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator, 47, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scientific American. (2011). Energy and sustainability: Safecast. http://www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-science/project.cfm?id=safecast-open-information. Downloaded October 3, 2011.

  • St. John, M., & Perry, D. (1993). A framework for evaluation and research: Science, infrastructure and relationships. In S. Bicknell & G. Farmelo (Eds.), Museum visitor studies in the 90s (pp. 59–66). London: Science Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. (2006). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. (2008). The work of science museum educators. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for re-appraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3–15). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn D. Dierking .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dierking, L.D. (2013). Reconceptualizing a Lifelong Science Education System that Supports Diversity: The Role of Free-Choice Learning. In: Mansour, N., Wegerif, R. (eds) Science Education for Diversity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics