Abstract
Science educators worldwide are concerned about decreasing engagement in school science and declining enrollments in university science courses, a situation affecting societal vitality and informed democratic participation in science. I share these same concerns, however, suggesting that the primary issue is the way in which schools and universities approach diversity seems problematic. I posit that the practice of science education itself needs to become more diverse, embracing innovative approaches to learning. Findings from a US National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded retrospective study of the long-term impacts of gender-focused, free-choice science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning experiences build a case for developing a lifelong science learning system that supports diversity broadly, acknowledging the diverse places in which learning happens, the variety of forms of learning employed, and the multitude of reasons why someone might be interested and engaged in STEM. Two hundred and thirteen young women from diverse backgrounds underrepresented in STEM who had taken part in programs 10–20 years before participated in a web-based survey. Findings indicate that participation contributed to lasting impacts in interest, engagement, and participation in science communities, hobbies, and careers, influencing women’s identities and relationship to and with science. Programs also helped participants become more interested in STEM, appreciate the diversity of disciplines and practices embodied within it; build social capital, such as long-term mentors and friends who could further interest and persistence in STEM; and increased agency, influencing future careers, education, and hobbies/pursuits. Effects were particularly significant for women living in urban areas. Results reinforce free-choice science learning as a critical player in a comprehensive, whole life approach to science education reform for diversity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Association of Science-Technology Centers. (2010). Science center and museum statistics. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
Azevedo, F. S. (2004). Serious play: A comparative study of learning and engagement in hobby practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Bachman, J. (2011). STEM learning activity among home-educating families. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Baker, D. (1992). I am what you tell me to be: Girls in science and mathematics. ASTC Newsletter, 20(4), 5, 6 & 9.
Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behavior through free-choice learning experiences: What is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–296.
Barton, A. C. (1998a). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379–394.
Barton, A. C. (1998b). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525–541.
Barton, A. (2001a). Capitalism, critical pedagogy and urban science education: An interview with Peter McLaren. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 847–859.
Barton, A. (2001b). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899–917.
Biggs, A. G., & Richwine, J. (2011a). Public school teachers aren’t underpaid (Column, 11/16). USA Today, McLean, VA.
Biggs, A. G., & Richwine, J. (2011b). Assessing the compensation of public-school teachers: A report of the Heritage Center for Data Analysis. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
Bouffard, S., Little, P., & Weiss, H. (2006). Demographic differences in patterns of youth out-of-school time activity participation. Journal of Youth Development, 12(1/2), 2–6
Brody, M., Tomkiewicz, W., & Graves, C. (2002). Park visitors’ understanding, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1119–1141.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2011a). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–11 edition: Archivists, curators, and museum technicians.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2011b). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–11 edition: Teachers—kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary.
Campbell, P. (1991). Math, science, and your daughter: What can parents do? Encouraging girls in math and science series (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 172). Newton: Women’s Educational Equity Act Publishing Center.
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2009). The opportunity equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. www.Opportunityequation.org. Accessed on 14 May 2013.
Clewell, B. C., & Burger, C. J. (2002). At the crossroads: Women, science, and engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 249–254.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85, 712–732.
Darke, K., Clewell, B. C., & Sevo, R. (2002). A study of the National Science Foundation’s program for women and girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 285–303.
Davis, K. S. (1999). Why science? Women scientists and their pathways along the road less traveled. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(2), 129–153.
Davis, K. S. (2001). “Peripheral and subversive”: Women making connections and challenging the boundaries of the science community. Science Education, 85, 368–409.
Dierking, L. D. (2010). A comprehensive approach to fostering the next generation of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education leaders. The New Educator, 6, 297–309.
Dierking, L. D. (in press-a). A view through another window: Free-choice science learning and generation R. In D. Zeidler (Series Ed.) & M. P. Muelle, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility): A guide to legislation and school policy in science education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education).
Dierking, L. D. (in press-b). Museums, families and communities: Being of value. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1998). Free-choice learning: An alternative term to informal learning? Informal Learning Environments Research Newsletter. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Optimizing out-of-school time: The role of free-choice learning. New Directions for Youth Development, 97, 75–89.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2009). Learning for life: The role of free-choice learning in science education. In K. Tobin, & W.-M. Roth (Series Ed.) & W. M. Roth, & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: Handbook of research in North America (pp. 179–205). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dierking, L. D., & Martin, L. M. W. (Eds.). (1997). Special issue of Science Education, 81(6).
Dierking, L. D., & Richter, J. (1995). Project ASTRO: Astronomers and teachers as partners. Science Scope, 18(6), 5–9.
Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” Ad Hoc Committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108–111. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 81–102). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Fadigan, K., & Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 835–860.
Falk, J. H. (2006). The impact of visit motivation on learning: Using identity as a construct to understand the visitor experience. Curator, 49(2), 151–166.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95% solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98, 486–493.
Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors' agendas on museum learning. Curattor, 41, 107–120.
Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Storksdieck, M. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469.
Fehrer, E., & Rennie, L. (2003). Special Informal Learning issue of Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Guest Editorial, 40(2), 105–107.
Fort, D. C. (1993). The consensus. In D. C. Fort (Ed.), A hand up: Women mentoring women in science (pp. 121–144). Washington, DC: Association for Women in Science.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860–877.
Grayson, L. (2011). How much does a historian get paid? eHow. Accessed on 21 May 2013.
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). New York: Routledge.
Horrigan, J. (2006). The Internet as a resource for news and information about science. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Jones, K. R. (2006). Relationships matter: A mixed methods evaluation of youth and adults working together as partners. Journal of Youth Development, 1(2), 31–47.
Katz, P. (1998, April). Mothers as informal science class teachers: Voluntary participation, motivation, and outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Korpan, C. A., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., Boehme, C., & Lynch, M. A. (1997). What did you learn outside of school today? Using structured interviews to document home and community activities related to science and technology. Science Education, 81(6), 651–662.
Mansour, N., & Wegerif, R. (2013). Why science education for diversity? In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice. New York/Heidelberg: Springer.
Martin, B., Kass, H., & Brouwer, W. (1990). Authentic science: A diversity of meanings. Science Education, 74, 541–554.
McCreedy, D. (2003). Educating adult females for leadership roles in an informal science program for girls. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28, 14–24.
Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. (2006). Adult science learning from local television newscasts. Science Communication, 28(2), 216–242.
National Academies of Science. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: Places, people and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Penuel, W. R. (2011, September 28). Analyzing the mutual constitution of persons and cultural practices in STEM learning research. Center for Lifelong STEM Learning 2020 Vision Presentation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Purcell, K. (2011). E-reader ownership doubles in six months: Tablet adoption grows more slowly. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moor, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737–756.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roth, M.-W. (1995). Authentic school science. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Roth, M.-W. (1997). From everyday science to science education: How science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research. Science Education, 6, 373–396.
Roth, W., & Van Eijck, M. (2010). Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span. Science Education, 94(6), 1027–1048.
Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator, 47, 389–412.
Scientific American. (2011). Energy and sustainability: Safecast. http://www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-science/project.cfm?id=safecast-open-information. Downloaded October 3, 2011.
St. John, M., & Perry, D. (1993). A framework for evaluation and research: Science, infrastructure and relationships. In S. Bicknell & G. Farmelo (Eds.), Museum visitor studies in the 90s (pp. 59–66). London: Science Museum.
Tran, L. (2006). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 1–21.
Tran, L. (2008). The work of science museum educators. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(2), 135–153.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk: Sharpe.
Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for re-appraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3–15). New York: Routledge.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dierking, L.D. (2013). Reconceptualizing a Lifelong Science Education System that Supports Diversity: The Role of Free-Choice Learning. In: Mansour, N., Wegerif, R. (eds) Science Education for Diversity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4562-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4563-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)