Skip to main content

Physical Education in Higher Education in Hong Kong: The Effects of the Intervention on Pre-service Sports Coaches’ Attitudes Towards Assessment for Learning Used in Sports

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 18))

  • 2061 Accesses

Abstract

This study examined the immediate and long-term effects of an Assessment for Learning intervention on pre-service sports coaches’ attitudes towards Assessment for Learning in sports. The hypothesis that the intervention had an immediate effect on the experimental group towards Assessment for Learning was only partially supported by this research. Nevertheless, the hypothesis that the intervention had a long-term effect was supported. This study has successfully shown that the intervention can be very effective in developing competencies in Assessment for Learning among pre-service sports coaches in Hong Kong. Through the intervention, the pre-service sport coaches made positive changes in attitudes towards Assessment for Learning, as used in sports teaching, and recognised its effect on student learning. Their positive responses serve as a “green light” for introducing Assessment for Learning for all in-service sports coaches and physical education teachers in Hong Kong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Available on the Assessment Reform Group website: www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk

  • Berry, R. (2005). Entwining feedback, self- and peer-assessment. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: GL Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2002). The ‘mini-viva’ as a tool to enhance assessment for learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casbon, C., & Spackman, L. (2005). Assessment for learning in physical education. Leeds: Coachwise Business Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. K., Sum, K. W., & Lau, K. O. (2006). Barriers to the implementation of physical education (PE) assessment in Hong Kong. The International Journal Learning, 13(4), 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H. P. R. (2002). Factors influencing attitudes of Hong Kong secondary school students toward physical education. Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, P. L., & Tang, S. Y. F. (2009). Teacher commitment trends: Cases of Hong Kong teachers from 1997 to 2007. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 767–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, R., & Gould, E. (2011). Psychology around us. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. J., & Deretchin, L. F. (2010). Cultivating curious and creative minds: The role of teachers and teacher educators. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn – The way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Physical education key learning area, curriculum guide (Primary 1 - Secondary 3). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area: English language curriculum guide (Primary 1–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2006). English language education key learning area: New senior secondary curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, V. B. (2011). Crisis prevention and intervention in the classroom: What teachers should know (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: School-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, C. J., et al. (2009). 50 ways to close the achievement gap (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echevarría, J., & Vogt, M. E. (2011). Response to intervention (RTI) and English learners: Making it happen. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, R. B., & Spencer, S. S. (2011). Planning effective instruction for students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2008). Assessment for learning and teaching in secondary schools. Exeter: Learning Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. H. (1988). School physical education in Hong Kong. Physical Education Review, 11(2), 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Applying educational research: How to read, do, and use research to solve problems of practice (6th ed.). Boston/Hong Kong: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston/Hong Kong: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R. (2009). Professional development in assessment for learning. United States: Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. J. (2010). Research in psychology: Methods and design (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (6th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, A., & Jones, C. (2011). The ethics of sports coaching. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, D. (2010). Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, A. B., & Holliman, S. L. (2009). Urban teacher commitment: Exploring associations with organizational conflict, support for innovation, and participation. Urban Education, 44(2), 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2008). Research design in counseling (3rd ed.). Belmont, Calif: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, D. (2008). Understanding effective learning: Strategies for the classroom. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinett, K., & Thomas, J. (1999). Staff guide to self and peer assessment. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2007). Longitudinal study on the implementation of the school-based assessment component of the 2007 HKCE English Language Examination. (Final Report). Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Sports Development Board. (1999). Local educational courses in sport & physical education. Hong Kong: The Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoodin, R. B. (2011). Intervention in child language disorders: A comprehensive handbook. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K. (2010). Quantitative research in education: A primer. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., Armour, K., & Potrac, P. (2004). Sports coaching cultures: From practice to theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidman, L., & Hanrahan, S. (2011). The coaching process: A practical guide to becoming an effective sports coach (3rd ed.). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12, 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2004). From students to teachers – A longitudinal study of occupational socialization of pre-service physical education teachers in Hong Kong. England: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2010). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissitz, R. W. (2009). The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. K. R. (1998). The implementation of a cognitive teaching approach to games in Hong Kong. England: Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. P., & Nendel, J. D. (2011). Service-learning in physical education and related professions: A global perspective. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, M. C. M. (2010). Self-directed learning oriented assessment: Assessment that informs learning & empowers the learner. Hong Kong: PACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D. (2011). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrie, M. (2011). Humanitarian intervention and the United Nations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, C., Holtham, C., & Courtney, N. (2009). Improving students’ learning outcomes. Koge: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2011). Educational psychology: Developing learners (7th ed.). Boston/Hong Kong: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, N. S. K., & Leung, Z. L. M. (2010). Teachers’ competence in assessment for learning in early childhood and primary education. Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G., & Green, S. (2009). Effective learning. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, G. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., & Leafstedt, J. M. (2010). Early reading intervention: Strategies and methods for struggling readers. Boston/Hong Kong: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. E. (2010). Foundations of sports coaching. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. D. (2002). The California School of Professional Psychology handbook of multicultural education, research, intervention, and training (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah, B. (2008). Effect of intervention on the development of preschool children: An experimental study. New Delhi: Dominant Publishers and Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. (2011). Cross-curricular teaching and learning in the secondary school. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • School-based Assessment Consultancy Team. (2007). Professional development for the school-based assessment component of the 2007 HKCE English Language Examination [DVD]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority and The Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnet, H. (2010). Positive intervention for pupils who struggle at school: Creating a modified primary curriculum. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, J. R. G. (1992). Was there a hawthorne effect? American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S., et al. (2011). Educational psychology: A practitioner-researcher approach (2nd ed.). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troman, G., & Raggal, A. (2008). Primary teacher commitment and the attractions of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 16(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Monetti, D. M. (2011). Educational psychology (1st ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. H. (2000). Student teacher self-assessment: A proposed method of professional development. New Orleans: UMI Dissertation Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2000). Formative assessment in mathematics part 3: The learner’s role. Equals: Mathematics and Special Educational Needs, 6(1), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. In D. Scoot (Ed.), Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165–181). Westport: Alex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2007a). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2007b). Content then process: Teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In D. Reeves (Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 182–204). Bloomington: Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. A. (2010). A best practice guide to assessment and intervention for autism and Asperger syndrome in schools. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, E. W., & Chiu, C. W. T. (1999). Measuring change across multiple occasions using the Rasch rating scale model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(4), 360–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analyses. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Kai On Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, H.K.O. (2012). Physical Education in Higher Education in Hong Kong: The Effects of the Intervention on Pre-service Sports Coaches’ Attitudes Towards Assessment for Learning Used in Sports. In: Mok, M. (eds) Self-directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4507-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics