Skip to main content

Agri-Food systems and territorial development: innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic

Abstract

The chapter explores the linkages between farming systems and agri-food chains in a territorial development context. Lock-in effects within the current agri-food system are analysed through a socio-historical analysis. Then the experiences of emergent, still relatively small-scale, alternative food networks are assessed in terms of their transformative potential to enable sustainable food systems at a larger scale. Finally, the analysis focuses on the transition processes of agri-food systems at the territorial scale and considers the changes needed in governance modes. The chapter underlines the interdependencies and possible complementarities between the various actors of agri-food systems from production to consumption, including intermediaries as well as public policies and civil society. It emphasizes the transition and governance aspects involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Examples are case-studies in European research projects such as IMPACT (www.rural-impact.net), SUS-CHAIN (www.sus-chain.org) and COFAMI (www.cofami.org).

  2. 2.

    GAS: Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity-based Purchase Groups).

  3. 3.

    AMAP: Association pour le Maintien d’une Agriculture Paysanne (Associations for the Maintenance of Peasant Agriculture).

  4. 4.

    Sociological studies realized within the European Network of Excellence ENDURE (2007–2010) as well as within the French ANR projects GéDUPIC and POPSY concerning transitions towards integrated protection (2007–2009 and 2008–2012).

  5. 5.

    The results are based on 188 qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders by sociologists in France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, Denmark, Italy, Poland and Hungary within ENDURE.

  6. 6.

    This analysis draws on research for the European IN-SIGHT project (Brunori et al. 2007; Dockès et al. 2008) and for a regional project that has monitored this reality since 2006.

References

  • Allen, P., FitzSimmons, M., Goodman, M., & Warner, K. (2003). Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: The tectonics of alternative food initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C., & Hochereau, F. (2008). Gouverner le “progrès génétique”. Biopolitique et métrologie de la construction d’un standard variétal dans la France agricole d’après-guerre. Annales HSS, 6, 1305–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, G., Rossi, A., & Guidi, F. (2007). In-depth review on alternative food marketing strategies. Case study: Solidarity-Based Purchasing Groups (National report in IN-SIGHT EU Project FP6, WP3). From www.insightproject.net, 1 April 2011

  • Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Rand, S., & Proost, J. (2009). Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: From linear models to systemic approaches. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, G., Rossi, A., & Malandrin, V. (2011). Co-producing transition: Innovation processes in farms adhering to solidarity-based purchase groups (GAS) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 18, 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, G., Rossi, A., & Guidi, F. (2012). On the new social relations around and beyond food. Analysing consumers’ role and action in gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups). Sociologia Ruralis, 52, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, A. (2012). L’agriculture à l’épreuve de l’écologisation. Eléments pour une sociologie des transitions. Ph.D. thesis in sociology, at EHESS in April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiffoleau, Y. (2009). From politics to co-operation: The dynamics of embeddedness in alternative food supply chains. Sociologia Ruralis, 49, 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, C. A., & Myhre, A. (2000). Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization, 59, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., & Gunby, P. (1996). Sprayed to death: Path dependence, lock-in and pest control. Economic Journal, 106, 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sainte Marie, C. (2010). La protection fruitière intégrée en France. Leçons d’une histoire dont nous ne sommes pas les héros. In J. Muchnik & C. de Sainte Marie (Eds.), Le temps des Syal. Versailles: Quæ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockès, A. C., Guillaumin, A., Rossi, A., Savelkouls, C., Thévenod-Mottet, E., & Rand, S. (2008). Innovations systems and processes in the field of agricultural direct marketing: A cross-national analysis between France, Switzerland, Italy and The Netherlands (EU Project IN-SIGHT, Deliverable 3). From http://www.insightproject.net, 1 April 2011

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effland, H. (1981). Un système intensif en Schleswig-Holstein. Perspectives Agricoles, 45, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., & Goodman, M. (2007). Localism, livelihoods and the ‘post-organic’: Changing perspectives on alternative food networks in the United States. In D. Maye, L. Holloway, & M. Kneafsey (Eds.), Alternative food geographies: Representation and practice (pp. 23–38). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., & Adelaja, A. (2002). Farmers’ markets: Consumer trends, preferences and characteristics. Journal of Extension, 40, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2002). Commodified meanings, meaningful commodities: Re-thinking production-consumption links through the organic system of provision. Sociologia Ruralis, 42, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). The trouble with ‘organic lite’ in California: A rejoinder to the ‘conventionalisation’ debate. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. (2008). Locating food democracy: Theoretical and practical ingredients. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 3, 286–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, I., Lamine, C., Paratte, R., Wierzbicka, A., Zoltan, S., Lehota, J., Buurma, J., Vandenberg, I., Maraccini, E., Moonen, C., & Williamson, S. (2010). Are supermarkets a tool facilitating the transition to low input farming practices? In Proceeding of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1855–1864). From www.european-ifsa.org

  • Hediger, W. (2006). Concepts and definitions of multifunctionality in Swiss agricultural policy and research. European Series on Multifunctionality, 10, 167–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl, A. (2004). The role of transport in firms’ spatial organization: Evidence from the Spanish food processing industry. European Planning Studies, 12, 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E., & Tuomainen, H. (2007). Possible food economies: A methodological framework for exploring food production–consumption relationships. Sociologia Ruralis, 47, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. (2007). Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D., & Howard, P. H. (2010). Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerton, S., & Sinclair, A. J. (2010). Buying local organic food: A pathway to transformative learning. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, J. (2004). Alternative strategies in the UK agro-food system: Interrogating the alterity of farmers’ markets. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, J., Slee, R., Foster, C., & Wiskerke, J. S. (2012). Dynamics and diversity in food supply chains across Europe. In J. S. C. Wiskerke, G. van Huylenbroeck, & J. Kirwan (Eds.), Sustaining food supply chains: Grounded perspectives on the dynamics and impact of new modes of food provision. London: Ashgate, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneafsey, M., Holloway, L., Cox, R., Dowler, L., Venn, L., & Tuomainen, L. (2008). Reconnecting consumers, producers and food: Exploring alternatives. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. (2005). Settling the shared uncertainties: Local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociologia Ruralis, 45, 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. (2011). Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. (forthcoming). Changer de système: une analyse des transitions vers l’agriculture biologique à l’échelle des systèmes agri-alimentaires territoriaux. Terrains et Travaux, accepted, in revision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C., Meynard, J. M., Bui, S., & Messéan, A. (2010). Transition pathways for input reduction: Lock-in effects and transition opportunities at the scale of the agri-food system. Innovations Agronomiques, 8, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C., Navarrete, M., & Cardona, A. (2012). Transitions towards organic farming at the farm and at the local scales: The role of innovative production and organisational modes and networks. In S. Bellon & S. Penvern (Eds.), Organic farming. Springer, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., Barling, D., & Caraher, M. (2009). Food policy: Integrating health, environment and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. K. (2003). The condition of rural sustainability. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J. M., & Girardin, P. (1991). Produire autrement. Le Courrier de la Cellule environnement de l’INRA, 15, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (2008). Greening the realm: Sustainable food chains and the public plate. Regional Studies, 42, 1237–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. and R. Sonnino (2008) The School food revolution: Public food and the challenge of sustainable development. London, Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, A., Morgan, S., & Morgan, K. (2008). Food hubs: The ‘missing middle’ of the local food infrastructure? Cardiff: BRASS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, C. (2008). Can Wal-Mart do ‘local’? The retail giant is using in-state farmers in an attempt to soften its image. U.S. News and World Report 24 July. http://www.usnews.com/articles/­business/economy/2008/07/24/can-wal-mart-do-local.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2008.

  • Possas, M. L., Salles-Filho, S., & Maria da Silveira, J. (1996). An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: Some preliminary remarks. Research Policy, 25, 933–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, M.-C. (2005). Quality certification, regulation and power in fair trade. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H. (2008). New emerging roles for public institutions at the urban-rural interface: The cases of public food procurement and urban food strategies. Paper presented at conference “Transitions towards sustainable agriculture, food chains and peri-urban areas”, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning, 35, 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., Oostindie, H., Laurent, C., Brunori, G., & Barjolle, D. (2008). Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new territorial linkages. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7, 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B. (2010). Feeding a world city: The London food strategy. International Planning Studies, 14, 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexibility and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, B., Bouchard, C., Loyce, C., Meynard, J. M., Guyomard, H., Lonnet, P., & Doussinault, G. (2003). Des itinéraires techniques à bas niveaux d’intrants pour des variétés rustiques de blé tendre: une alternative pour concilier économie et environnement. Courrier de l’environnement, 49, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G. (2006). Conscious consumer resistance? Local organic food networks versus the supermarkets. EDM-2006-14, http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/edm/edm_2006_14.pdf

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2006). Community action: A neglected site of innovation for sustainable development? (CSERGE Working Paper, EDM 06-10, pp. 1–5). Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2005) Changing human behaviour and lifestyle: a challenge for sustainable ­consumption? In: Ropke, I., & Reisch, L. (Eds.), Consumption - Perspectives from ecological economics. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39, 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2006). Beyond the divide: Rethinking relations between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 81–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J. D. (2004). The virtual farmer. Past, present and future of the Dutch peasantry. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J. D., & Marsden, T. (Eds.). (2008). Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development (European perspectives on rural development). Assen: Royal van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2004). Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38, 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P. (2007). A food strategy for the Amsterdam region. Presentation at the CEMR event ‘Renewal of urban-rural relationships: The key role of food’, Brussels, 12 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D., Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Making re-connections in agro-food geography: Alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies. Natures, cultures and spaces. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S., & Campbell, H. (2004). The chestnut economy: The praxis of neo-peasantry in rural France. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2003). On promising niches and constraining sociotechnical regimes: The case of Dutch wheat and bread. Environment and Planning A, 35, 429–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2010). On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies, 14, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke, J. S. C., & van der Ploeg, J. D. (2004). Seeds of transition: Essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Lamine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lamine, C., Renting, H., Rossi, A., Wiskerke, J.S.C.(., Brunori, G. (2012). Agri-Food systems and territorial development: innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics