Advertisement

Memristors for More Than Just Memory: How to Use Learning to Expand Applications

  • Paul J. Werbos
Part of the Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems book series (SSCNS, volume 4)

Abstract

There has been a huge explosion of interest in the memristor since the first experimental confirmation by HP in 2008 (Strukov et al., Nature 453:80–83, 2008). Because the memristor and its variants provide a huge increase in memory density, compared with existing technologies like flash memory , many of us expect that they will move very quickly to a huge and important market in the memory area. But what about other large-scale markets and applications? What is the pathway which could open up those larger markets? The purpose of this chapter is to discuss what would be needed to capture those larger markets.

Keywords

Mixed Integer Linear Programming Cellular Neural Network Grand Challenge Massive Parallelism Adaptive Dynamic Programming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Strukov DB, Snider GS, Stewart DR, Williams RS (2008, May 1) The missing memristor found. Nature 453:80–83. doi:10.1038/nature06932 (Received 6 December 2007; Accepted 17 March 2008)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chua LO (1971) Memristor—the missing circuit element. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory CT-18(5):507–519. doi:10.1109/TCT.1971.1083337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mead C, Conway L (1980) Introduction to VLSI systems. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mead C (1989) Analog VLSI and neural systems. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mead C (1990, October) Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proc IEEE 78(10):1629–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson J, Rosenfeld E (eds) (1998) Talking nets. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Werbos P (1994) The roots of backpropagation: from ordered derivatives to neural networks and political forecasting. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Werbos P (1998) Values, goals and utility in an engineering-based theory of mammalian intelligence. In: Pribram KH (ed) Brain and values. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf07579/nsf07579.htmGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Werbos P (2009, April) Intelligence in the brain: a theory of how it works and how to build it. Neural Networks 22(3):200–212. Related material is posted at www.werbos.com/Mind.htmPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White D, Sofge D (eds) (1992) Handbook of intelligent control. Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Si J, Barto AG, Powell WB, Wunsch D (eds) (2004) Handbook of learning and approximate dynamic programming (IEEE press series on computational intelligence). Wiley-IEEE Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis FL, Liu D (2012) Reinforcement learning and approximate dynamic programming for feedback control, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Werbos P (2011) Mathematical foundations of prediction under complexity, Erdos Lecture series, 2011. http://www.werbos.com/Neural/Erdos_talk_Werbos_final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu R, Wunsch DC (2008) Clustering. IEEE/Wiley Press, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Werbos P (2005) Backwards differentiation in AD and neural nets: past links and new opportunities. In: Bucker HM, Corliss G, Hovland P, Naumann U, Norris B (eds) Automatic differentiation: applications, theory and implementations. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Werbos P (1990, October) Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proc IEEE 78(10): 1550–1560 (Updated version reprinted in [7])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Werbos P (2009, October) Towards a rational strategy for the human settlement of space. Futures 41(8):547–553. Posted at http://www.werbos.com/E/Rational_Space_Policy.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Werbos P (2012) Reminiscences on the loss of hope for primates in space, actual problems of aviation and aerospace systems (RASJ), 1/17(34):67–81. http://www.kcn.ru/tat_en/science/ans/journals/rasj.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Werbos P (2011, August) Computation intelligence for the smart grid—history, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 6(3):14–21Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Werbos P (2012) Neural networks and the experience and cultivation of mind. Neural Networks, special issue based on IJCNN2011, in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.026Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prokhorov D (2008, March–April) Prius HEV neurocontrol and diagnostics. Neural Networks 21(2–3):458–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kavukcuoglu K, Sermanet P, Boureau Y-L, Gregor K, Mathieu M, LeCun Y (2010) Learning convolutional feature hierachies for visual recognition. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS 2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    LeCun Y, Kavukvuoglu K, Farabet C (2010) Convolutional networks and applications in vision. Proceedings of the international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS’10), IEEE, 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons: an introduction to computational geometry. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scheibel ME, Schiebel AB (1970) Elementary processes in selected thalamic and cortical subsystems—the structural substrates. In: Schmitt FO (ed) The neurosciences: second study program. Rockefeller University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foote SL (1987) Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function. Annu Rev Neurosci 10:67–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Werbos L, Kozma R, Silva-Lugo R, Pazienza GE, Werbos P (2011) Metamodeling for large-scale optimization tasks based on object networks, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks IJCNN2011, IEEE, 2011Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Werbos L, Kozma R, Silva-Lugo R, Pazienza GE, Werbos P (2012) Metamodeling and critic-based approach to multi-level optimization. Neural Networks, submitted by invitation to IJCNN2011 special issue to be printed in 2012Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Venayagamoorthy G (2011, August) Dynamic, stochastic, computational and scalable technologies for smart grids. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 6(3):22–35Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liang J, Venayagamoorthy GK, Harley RG (2012, March) Wide-area measurement based dynamic stochastic optimal power flow control for smart grids with high variability and uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3(1):59–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy, Power and Adaptive SystemsNational Science FoundationArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations