Homomeric Interaction of the STAS Domain in Sultr1;2

  • Nakako Shibagaki
  • Arthur R. Grossman
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the International Plant Sulfur Workshop book series (PIPSW, volume 1)


We recently reported the interaction of the STAS domain of SULTR1;2 and O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase (OASTL). This inter-protein interaction was initially identified in the yeast two hybrid system and was confirmed using other methods. Interestingly, we also found that the STAS domain (comprised of both the L and STAS’ regions) of SULTR1;2 undergoes a homomeric interaction; an association between two STAS domains occurs as a consequence of a specific interaction between the L and STAS’ regions of the domain. The strength of this interaction depends on whether one or both of the interacting STAS partners contains an L region. A similar interaction was observed for the L and STAS’ regions of SULTR3;1 but not of SULTR1;1. Lesions that alter the SULTR1;2 L and STAS’ interactions do not appear to markedly impact sulfate transport activity, at least in yeast cells, although they may impact transport activity of SULTR1;2 in Arabidopsis. Hence, while regulation of sulfate transporter activity occurs through interactions of the transporter with OASTL, transporter activity may also be modulated by homomeric interactions in the STAS domain.


Sulfate Transporter Separation Sequence Blue Coloni Heterogenous Interaction Bait Construct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by NSF Grant MCB-0824469 awarded to ARG.


  1. Doyle T, Botstein D (1996) Movement of yeast cortical actin cytoskeleton visualized in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3886–3891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Loque D, Lalonde S, Looger LL, von Wiren N, Frommer WB (2007) A cytosolic trans-activation domain essential for ammonium uptake. Nature 446:195–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Pasqualetto E, Aiello R, Gesiot L, Bonetto G, Bellanda M, Battistutta R (2010) Structure of the cytosolic portion of the motor protein prestin and functional role of the STAS domain in SLC26/SulP anion transporters. J Mol Biol 400:448–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rouached H, Berthomieu P, El Kassis E, Cathala N, Catherinot V, Labesse G, Davidian JC, Fourcroy P (2005) Structural and functional analysis of the C-terminal STAS (sulfate transporter and anti-sigma antagonist) domain of the Arabidopsis thaliana sulfate transporter SULTR1.2. J Biol Chem 280:15976–15983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Shibagaki N, Grossman AR (2004) Probing the function of STAS domains of the Arabidopsis sulfate transporters. J Biol Chem 279:30791–30799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shibagaki N, Grossman AR (2006) The role of the STAS domain in the function and biogenesis of a sulfate transporter as probed by random mutagenesis. J Biol Chem 281:22964–22973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shibagaki N, Grossman AR (2010) Binding of cysteine synthase to the STAS domain of sulfate transporter and its regulatory consequences. J Biol Chem 285:25094–25102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zheng J, Du GG, Anderson CT, Keller JP, Orem A, Dallos P, Cheatham M (2006) Analysis of the oligomeric structure of the motor protein prestin. J Biol Chem 281:19916–19924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyThe Carnegie Institution for ScienceStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Research and Innovation CenterNihon L’OrealKawasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations