Advertisement

Occupational Justice’s Intents and Impacts: From Personal Choices to Community Consequences

  • Rachel Thibeault
Chapter

Abstract

Community development constitutes the main arena where occupational justice may unfold on a larger scale. In this chapter, I develop the idea that true community development is still rarely mentioned in the fields of occupational therapy and occupational science. Building on the familiar concepts of occupation, client-centeredness, social justice and meaning, I discuss the concept of community development as a realm where the client is plural; yet the methods and principles so fundamental to occupational therapy and occupational science remain unchanged in response to this realm. Among the key steps to address the issue are the explicit recognition and sharing of power in its many forms, a careful analysis of local dynamics and contexts, and a thorough examination of one’s values and motives. All these steps inform an occupational process that spans the continuum, from needs assessments and mobilization to community monitoring and maintenance. The ideal result is carefully selected occupations fostering dignity, growth, self-discovery, solidarity, leadership building, and collective inquiry.

Keywords

Community Development Occupational Therapy Host Community Wheelchair Basketball Occupational Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrett, H. R. (1997). Women, occupation and health in rural Africa: Adaptation to a changing socioeconomic climate. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, M., & Hartl, M. (2010). Lightening the load. London: International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)/Practical Action Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, G. (2008). A model of occupational empowerment for marginalized populations in community environments. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 22, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2005). Overcoming occupational apartheid: A preliminary exploration of the political nature of occupational therapy. In F. Kronenberg, S. Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 58–86). Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  6. Polatajko, H. J., Milke, D., Baptiste, S., Doble, S., Caron-Santha, J., Kirsh, B., et al. (2007). Occupational science: Imperatives for occupational therapy. In E. Townsend & H. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation 2007 (pp. 63–86). Ottawa: CAOT Publication ACE.Google Scholar
  7. Remen, R. N. (2000). My grandfather’s blessings. New York: Rivermead Books.Google Scholar
  8. SAS² website. (2011). From community-based research, organizational learning, project planning and evaluation to public engagement. Accessed 4 Aug 2011 at http://www.sas2.net/
  9. Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centered practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 75–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations