Skip to main content

Mixed Methods and Pragmatism for Research on Occupation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactional Perspectives on Occupation

Abstract

A transactional perspective of occupation means appreciating it as a relationship of person and situation, characterized by complexity, creativity, and habit. A transactional perspective may necessitate multiple methodological approaches and multiple sources of information. The complexities of occupation deserve a diversity of tools, but using mixed methods to answer questions about occupation is not common. Adopting the perspective of the pragmatists suggests that research should be focused on a problematic situation, and should employ the methods most likely to increase understanding of that situation. In this chapter I take a broad look at how pragmatism has been used as a justification for mixed methods research, then extend the justification and suggest how integrating a pragmatic approach with plural methods is particularly useful for studying occupation. I use concepts from John Dewey’s writings to show the synergy of pragmatism and mixed methods, including holism, provisionality of knowledge, the situatedness of inquiry, and the value-laden nature of research. The chapter concludes with a practical examination of how to use a mixed methods approach to effectively answer questions about occupation, and I argue that utilizing mixed methods and pragmatism can move occupational science forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My understanding of Pragmatism is informed primarily by the Deweyan version; other forms of the tradition vary somewhat, including with respect to these concepts.

  2. 2.

    Howe (1988) was an early voice in this debate; he wrote that “incompatibilists maintain that problems arise at the level of epistemological paradigms” (p. 10), and that the methods associated with each would therefore be incompatible. Also, I purposely leave constructivist epistemologies out of the discussion here to simplify the argument.

References

  • Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. D. (2006). Occupational science and the first-person perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 94–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. (2007). The philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Continuum International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisvert, R. D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey: Nature and cooperative intelligence. Peru: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. C. (1992). Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher, 21, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. (2010). Democracy & rhetoric: John Dewey on the arts of becoming. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P. (2001). Deweyan integration: Moving beyond place attachment in elderly migration theory. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 52, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P. (2008). John Dewey’s metaphysical ground-map and its implications for geographical inquiry. Geoforum, 39, 1555–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R., Bailliard, A., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. (2004). The role of methods in maintaining orthodox beliefs in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, V. A. (2010). Are occupations “processes too complicated to explain”? What we can learn by trying. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, V., Cutchin, M., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fange, A., & Ivanoff, S. D. (2009). The home is the hub of health in very old age: Findings from the ENABLE-AGE project. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48, 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (2005). Dewey on metaphysics, meaning making, and maps. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 41, 818–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C., Wright-St. Clair, V., & Bunrayong, W. (2002). The meaning of cooking and recipe work for older Thai and New Zealand women. Journal of Occupational Science, 9, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Education Researcher, 17, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H. W., Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., et al. (2007). Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: Conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. The Gerontologist, 47, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2010). The influence of Western society’s construction of a healthy daily life on the conceptualization of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18, 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroksmark, U., Mordell, K., Bendixen, H. J., Magnus, E., Jakobsen, K. A., & Alsaker, S. (2006). Time geographic method: Application to studying patterns of occupation in different contexts. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2006). Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: An analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Aging and Society, 26, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 51–90). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. W. (1990). Qualitative and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, H. W., Schilling, O., & Iwarsson, S. (2009). The home environment and quality of life-related outcomes in advanced old age: Findings of the ENABLE-AGE project. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerxa, E., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Peirce, D., et al. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. In J. Jackson & E. Yerxa (Eds.), Occupational science: The foundation for new models of practice. New York: The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kendra Heatwole Shank .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shank, K.H. (2013). Mixed Methods and Pragmatism for Research on Occupation. In: Cutchin, M., Dickie, V. (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics