Methods of Analysing Field Texts to Construct Research Texts

  • lisahunter
  • Elke Emerald
  • Gregory Martin
Part of the Explorations of Educational Purpose book series (EXEP, volume 26)

Abstract

Systematic and rigorous construction of field texts is pivotal in good empirical research. The previous chapter discussed some of the forms of field texts you might create in a PAtR. Whatever methods are used, there is an equally important ‘next phase’ to the process to help you make sense of what is going on: the analysis of field texts to create research texts. Research texts (Clandinin and Connelly 2000) are the texts produced through the analysis of field texts. Thinking about the analysis is part of the planning phase. Analysis allows you to explore, interpret and make sense of the field texts or data. There are powerful qualitative and quantitative computer software that can enhance your analysis, for example, NVivo (qualitative) and SPSS (quantitative). However, like all tools, you need to know how to use them effectively, and training in these packages is beyond the scope of this book, so we refer you to the many guides available should you want to employ such software.

Keywords

Thematic Analysis Critical Incident Narrative Analysis Field Text Narrative Inquiry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Austin, H., Dwyer, B. M., & Freebody, P. (2003). Schooling the child: The making of students in classrooms. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 351–371). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, J. (2000). Understanding Paulo Freire: Reflections on the origins, concepts, and possible pitfalls of his educational approach. Community Development Journal, 35(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology qualitative research. Psychology, 3, 77–101.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, L., & Austin, H. (2007). Silenced, silence, silent: Motherhood in the margins. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 660–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, L., & emerald, E. (2009). Stories from the margins: Mothering a child with ADHD or ASD. Teneriffe: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
  9. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  10. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Clandinin, J., & Rosiek, J. (2007). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35–76). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Clandinin, J., Huber, J., Huber, M., Murphy, M. S., Murray Orr, A., Pearce, M., & Stevves, P. (2006). Composing diverse identities: Narrative inquiries into the interwoven lives of children and teachers. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., & Tuhiwai Smith, L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Dick, B. (2002). Stakeholders and participation. Session 4 of Areol – Action Research and Evaluation. http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/areol/areol-session04.html. Accessed 15 June 2011.
  16. Foucault, M. (1991). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought (pp. 51–75). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, M., Mediratta, K., Ruglis, J., Stoudt, B., Shah, S., & Fine, M. (2010). Critical youth engagement: Participatory action research and organizing. In L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Puta, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy on civic engagement (pp. 621–650). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture power and liberation. New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Guess, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hays, S. (1996). Cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, L. (2002). Young people, physical education, and transition: Understanding practices in the middle years of schooling. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, R. L. (2004). “That’s very rude, I shouldn’t be telling you that”: Older women talking about sex. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrative, resisting, making sense (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Kellner, D. (1997). Ernst Bloch, Utopia and ideology critique. In T. Moylan & J. O. Daniel (Eds.), Not yet reconsidering Ernst Bloch (pp. 80–95). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, G. (2007). The poverty of critical pedagogy: Toward a politics of engagement. In P. McLaren & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 337–353). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. McAllister, M. M. (2001). In harm’s way: A postmodern narrative inquiry. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien, R. (2001). Um exame da abordagem metodológica da pesquisa ação [An overview of the methodological approach of action research]. In R. Richardson (Ed.), Teoria e Prática da Pesquisa Ação [Theory and practice of action research]. João Pessoa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba (English version) http://www.web.ca/∼robrien/papers/arfinal.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2002.
  29. Reissman, C. K., & Speedy, J. (2007). Narrative inquiry in the psychotherapy professions: A critical review. In J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 426–456). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  31. Throsby, K. (2004). Negotiating ‘normality’ when IVF fails. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 61–82). Philadelphia,: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: The development of professional judgement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Tripp, D. (1996). Critical incidents. Taken from The Scope Program. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia/Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Tripp, D. (1998). Critical incidents in action inquiry. In G. Shackloch & J. Smyth (Eds.), Being reflexive in educational and social research (pp. 36–49). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Žižek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Žižek, S. (1994). Introduction: The spectre of ideology. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 1–33). London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • lisahunter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elke Emerald
    • 3
  • Gregory Martin
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Sport and LeisureThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Human Movement StudiesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  4. 4.University of Technology SydneySydney,Australia

Personalised recommendations