Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Explorations of Educational Purpose ((EXEP,volume 26))

  • 1224 Accesses

Abstract

The process of researching is an educational process: We attempt to learn something new. And in the case of PAtR, those involved in the research create better conditions for themselves and in a flow on effect, perhaps for others. We can learn more through applying theory and constructing new theory, taking new perspectives, creating new insights and applying new practices just as we benefit from breakthroughs in technology or how we understand the mind. Throughout this chapter, we take an oppositional view of theory in that we understand theory to be critical (not simply affirmative or reproductive) and capable of producing new knowledges. Theory provides people with the individual and therefore political space to understand their situatedness within emerging social relations. We understand that the personal is political. For there to be change in societal practices, there needs to be changes in individual practices and therefore in practices between individuals. As you saw in Chap. 3, at root, critical theory (CT) is not neutral. It identifies itself with the interests and struggles of the people that we are involved with as workers in cultural professions. One’s beliefs, attitudes and assumptions come from one’s philosophical orientations, and we investigate these here as a means of supporting why certain questions might be asked and answered through PAtR and why other questions might sit outside PAtR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     Martin Bulmer’s (1982) Social Research Ethics examines the merits and dilemmas of covert or secret participant observation using actual examples of research such as Laud Humphries’ infamous Tearoom Trade (1970) for anyone contemplating whether it is justified.

References

  • Austin, H., Dwyer, B. M., & Freebody, P. (2003). Schooling the child: The making of students in classrooms. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: culture power and liberation. New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs, T., & Smith, M. (1999). Youth and policy: The problem of ‘Youth’ for youth work. Youth and Policy, 62, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • lisahunter, L. (2011). Re-embodying (preservice middle years) teachers? An attempt to reposition the body and its presence in teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2000). Don’t LEAP into this: Student resistance in labour market programmes. Educational Action Research Journal, 8(3), 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky, E., Sacco, D., Braxter, B., Dodge, P., Hughes, E., Ondeck, M., Stubbs, M., & Upvall, M. (2005). Participatory action research to understand and reduce health disparities. Nursing Outlook, 53(3), 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H. (2000). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: Ethical and political dilemmas in evaluation. In H. Simons & R. Usher (Eds.), Situated ethics in educational research (pp. 39–55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H., & Usher, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated ethics in educational research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2000). Writings on an ethical life. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2003). Ontology. In L. Floridi (Ed.) Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information (p. 155–166). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

lisahunter, Emerald, E., Martin, G. (2013). Where Do You Stand: Philosophical Orientations. In: Participatory Activist Research in the Globalised World. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4426-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics