Advertisement

Theoretical Orientations: Critical Theory and Related Theories for Activism

  • lisahunter
  • Elke Emerald
  • Gregory Martin
Part of the Explorations of Educational Purpose book series (EXEP, volume 26)

Abstract

The previous chapter gave a brief historical overview of the action research (AR) family and its salient features, forces and moments. AR is sometimes critiqued for its weak theoretical foundations, as practitioners may appear to be simply doing what seems to work, rather than being guided by principled theory. We address this in relation to a particular theory of action that underwrites PAtR. This is our point of departure from some other approaches, as we do not pretend research is objective or neutral. This chapter will briefly describe some of the history, philosophy and nature of the theory, critical theory (CT), that has influenced many action research methodologies generally (although at times obfuscated) and that we are foregrounding as the essential feature of PAtR. Just as all spokes in a wheel emanate from the central hub, so too all actions in PAtR emanate from critical theory.

Keywords

Critical Theory Female Genital Mutilation Feminist Theory Critical Pedagogy Critical Race Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anzaldúa, G. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul  =  Haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  2. Burbules, N. C., & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In T. Popkewitz & L. Fendler (Eds.), Critical theories in education (pp. 45–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2003). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Boca Raton: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. De Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2002). No place like home: The Pridehouse research project final report (Research report), 218 pp. Human Resources Development Canada www.sfu.ca/pridehouse. Accessed 4 Jan 2012.
  9. De Lauretis, T. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist studies, critical studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. De Lauretis, T. (1991). Queer theory: Lesbian and gay sexualities. An introduction. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  11. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., & Smith, L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Epprecht, M. (1999). The gay oral history project in Zimbabwe: Black empowerment, human rights, and the research process. History in Africa, 26, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1972). Cultural action for freedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 257–293.Google Scholar
  17. Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (1995). Radical pedagogy as cultural politics: Beyond the discourse of critique and anti-utopianism. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Critical and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Ed. &Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  19. Hegel, G.W. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit, (Trans. A. V. Miller) Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available in German free at: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6698
  20. Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  21. Hulme, P. (1995). Including America. Ariel, 26(1), 117–123.Google Scholar
  22. Kant, I. (1934). Critique of pure reason. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  23. Kirkpatrick, G., Katsiaficas, G., & Emery, M. (1978). Critical theory and the limits of sociological positivism. http://www.tryoung.com/archives/176krkpt.htm. Accessed 28 Sept 2005.
  24. Lather, P. (1986a). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lather, P. (1986b). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.Google Scholar
  26. Lather, P. (1991a). Deconstructing/deconstructive inquiry: The politics of knowing and being known. Educational Theory, 41(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lather, P. (1991b). Feminist research in education: Within/against. Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  28. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lather, P. (1994). Textual strategies and the politics of interpretation in educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 21(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lather, P. A. (1995). The validity of angels: Interpretive and textual strategies in researching the lives of women with HIV/AIDS. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder: Westview/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, K. (1967). Capital. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  34. Newman, M. (2006). Teaching defiance: Stories and strategies for activist educators. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Popkewitz, T., & Fendler, L. (1999). Critical theories in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Quinn, T. M., & Meiners, E. R. (2009, June 14–16). Queer identities and the privatization of U.S. public education: Doing and feeling research for social change. Paper presented at the Feminist and Anti-Oppressive Pedagogies in Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin: Zed Books/University of Otago Press/Distributed in the USA exclusively by St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • lisahunter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elke Emerald
    • 3
  • Gregory Martin
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Sport and LeisureThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Human Movement StudiesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  4. 4.University of Technology SydneySydney,Australia

Personalised recommendations