Final Thoughts

  • M. Joseph Sirgy
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 50)


In this chapter, I will discuss how public policy issues can be shaped by QOL research. I will also address the issue of whether we should broaden our perspective from individual-level research on QOL to societal-level research. And if so, how it should be done?


Ecological Footprint Good Society Public Policy Issue Happiness Research Emergent Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (1997). The social quality of Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  2. Berger-Schmitt, R., & Noll, H. H. (2000). Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators (Euroreporting working paper #9). Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA).Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, P. (1999). Social cohesion: A critique (CPRN discussion paper #F09). Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities (pp. 116–150). Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, P. A., & Weale, M. (1992). On measuring the quality of life. World Development, 20, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31. (Republished in E. Diener (Ed.). (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 201–265). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer)Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckersley, R. (2009). Population measures of subjective wellbeing: How useful are they? Social Indicators Research, 94, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estes, R. J. (1984). The social progress of nations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Estes, R. J. (1988). Trends in world social development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Estes, R. J. (1993). Toward sustainable development: From theory to praxis. Social Development Issues, 15(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  14. Estes, R. J. (1998). Trends in social world development, 1970–95: Development prospects for a new century. Journal of Developing Societies, 14(1), 11–39.Google Scholar
  15. Estes, R. J. (2010). The world social situation: Development challenges at the outset of a new century. Social Indicators Research, 98, 363–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferriss, A. (2010). Approaches to improving the quality of life: How to enhance the quality of life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hirata, J. (2011). Happiness, ethics and economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Marks, N., et al. (2006). The happy planet index. London: New Economics Foundation. Available at Scholar
  19. Ng, Y.-K. (2008). Environmentally responsible Happy Nation Index: Towards an internationally acceptable national success indicator. Social Indicators Research, 85, 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norrish, J. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit? Social Indicators Research, 87, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pew. (2007). Global opinion trends 2002–2007. Pew Global Attitudes Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from
  22. Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I., & Rootman, I. (1996). Quality of life indicators and health: Current status and emerging conceptions. Social Indicators Research, 39, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research: A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Rioux, M., & Hay, D. (1993). Well-being: A conceptual framework. In S. Planning & R. Council (Eds.), Well-being: A conceptual framework and three literature reviews. Vancouver: Social Planning and Research Council.Google Scholar
  25. Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Sirgy, M. J. (2001). Handbook of quality-of-life research: An ethical marketing perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Sirgy, M. J. (2011a). Employee well-being: An integrative perspective. In N. Reilly, M. J. Sirgy, & C. A. Gorman (Eds.), Ethics and quality of work life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Sirgy, M. J. (2011b). Societal QOL is more than the sum of QOL of individuals: The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sirgy, M. J., Samli, A. C., & Meadow, H. L. (1982). The interface between quality of life and marketing: A theoretical framework. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 1, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy-life expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 38, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations: Is there a conflict between individual and society? Social Indicators Research, 91, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Joseph Sirgy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marketing Pamplin College of BusinessVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations