Advertisement

The Syntax-Semantics Mappings of Affixal Quantifiers and Tripartite Structures

  • Peppina Po-lun Lee
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 87)

Abstract

This chapter answers the question of how the syntax of the sentences involving these affixal quantifiers is mapped to their semantic representations. I will argue that affixal quantifiers give a mapping mechanism distinct from that of A-quantifiers and that of D-quantifiers: while the selection of items for association is determined by the QAH as derived in  Chap. 3, there is no unified mapping for affixal quantifiers. When there is no focus in the sentence, their mapping is determined by the lexical semantics of individual affixal quantifiers: for -saai, the item selected from the QAH is mapped to the restrictor, with everything else within its scope to the nuclear scope; on the other hand, for -maai and -hoi, the item selected from the QAH is mapped to the nuclear scope, with everything else within its scope to the restrictor.

Keywords

Restrictive Domain Complement Clause Lexical Semantic Additive Quantifier Verbal Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bai, Wunyu. 1985. Nanningbaihua de [lai] yu Guangzhouhua de bijia [A comparative study of Nanningbiahua [lai] and Cantonese]. Fangyan 2: 140–145.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Carl Lee. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cheung, Hung Nin. 2007. Xianggang Yueyu Yufa de Yanjiu [A study on Cantonese grammar]. Rev. ed. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  5. de Swart, Henriëtte. 1993. Adverbs of quantification: A generalized quantifier approach. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Horn, Laurence R. 1969. A presupposition theory of ‘only’ and ‘even’. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, 318–327, April 18–19, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Hu, Jianhua. 2008. Mandarin object-taking intransitive constructions at the syntax-information structure interface. Zhongguo Yuwen 4: 396–409.Google Scholar
  8. Huang, C.T.James. 1982a. Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, C.T. James. 1990. On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese [Shuo shi he you]. In Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. Academia Sinica 59: 43–64.Google Scholar
  10. König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 197–236. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, Thomas Hun Tak. 1995. Postverbal quantifiers in Cantonese. Paper presented at the 10th workshop on Asian Oriental Linguistics, May 16–17, 1995. Paris: Centre de Recherches Linguistiques L’Asie Orientale.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tang, Sze Wing. 1996. A role of lexical quantifiers. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2): 307–323.Google Scholar
  15. Teng, Shou Hsin. 1973a. Scope of negation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(3): 475–478.Google Scholar
  16. Teng, Shou Hsin. 1973b. Negation and aspects in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(1): 14–37.Google Scholar
  17. Yeh, Meng. 1996. Experiential -guo in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5: 183–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peppina Po-lun Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chinese, Translation and LinguisticsCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations