Advertisement

Closing the Achievement Gap in Singapore

  • Jason TAN
Chapter

Abstract

Singapore’s education system has been under intense international scrutiny ever since its students’ spectacular results in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study were released in 1997. These results have been replicated in the subsequent international comparative studies of educational achievement, such as the most recent Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) study. At first glance, the system would appear, to the untrained eye, to have been extremely successful in terms of producing superior educational outcomes. This chapter discusses and analyzes the existence of gaps in the educational outcomes, along mainly social class and ethnic lines, as well as sustained government and community efforts to bridge these gaps. In addition, it highlights recurring tensions between elitist and egalitarian impulses in official policymaking. It will use a definition of the term achievement gap—disparities in educational outcomes between students of differing demographic characteristics such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status—which has been modified from the one used by Adekile (2012). To date, the scanty official data on the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects at the primary and secondary levels of schooling have been presented in terms of ethnicity. The data reveal that the ethnic Malay minority has persistently lagged behind the ethnic Chinese majority over the past decade, in terms of science achievement at the primary level and science and mathematics achievements at the secondary level. These gaps have persisted despite the existence of state-subsidized private tutoring schemes targeted at improving the ethnic Malay academic achievement.

Keywords

Private Tutoring Independent School Parliamentary Debate Central Provident Fund Learn Support Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adekile, A. (2012). Achievement gap. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 16–21). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Blackbox Research Pte Ltd. (2012). Private tuition in Singapore: A whitepaper release. http://www.blackbox.com.sg. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  3. Chong, T. (2012). A return to normal politics: Singapore general elections 2011. In D. Singh & P. Thambipillai (Eds.), Southeast Asian Affairs 2012 (pp. 283–298). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Entrepreneurs are born, not made. (1996, July 11). The Straits Times, 25.Google Scholar
  5. Goh, C. T. (1990). Edusave–a dividend to our citizens, an investment in our future. Speeches, 17(5), 8–13.Google Scholar
  6. Goh, C. T. (1996). Narrowing the income gap. Speeches, 20(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
  7. Ho, K. W. (2010). Social mobility in Singapore. In T. Chong (Ed.), Management of success: Singapore revisited (pp. 217–241). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Ho, L. (2012). Sorting citizens: Differentiated citizenship education in Singapore. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ho, P. S. K. (2012b). “I have won a world championship and now I can retire”: Exploring normal technical students’ ways of unpacking academic expectations in Singapore. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. How Singapore grooms its leaders. (2005, November 18). The Straits Times, 22.Google Scholar
  11. Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. (2012). Enriching a child’s future. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Kang, T. (2004). Schools and post-secondary aspirations among female Chinese, Malay and Indian normal stream students. In A. E. Lai (Ed.), Beyond rituals and riots: Ethnic pluralism and social cohesion in Singapore (pp. 146–171). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, K. Y. (1966). New bearings in our education system. Singapore: Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, K. Y. (1982). Mendaki’s task is to raise education of all Malays. Speeches, 5, 5–25.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, K. Y. (2011). Hard truths to keep Singapore going. Singapore: Straits Times Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lien Foundation. (2012). Singapore’s preschool education placed 29 th amongst 45 countries on the Starting Well Index. http://www.lienfoundation.org. Accessed 20 July 2012.
  17. Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports. (2012). Enhancements to the child development account (CDA). http://www.mcys.gov.sg. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  18. Ministry of Education. (1979). Report on the Ministry of Education 1978. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Education. (1998). Desired outcomes of education. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Education. (2010). Nurturing our young for the future: Competencies for the 21st century. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Education. (2012). Performance by ethnic group in national examinations 2002–2011. http://www.moe.gov.sg. Accessed 28 Feb 2013.
  22. Ministry of Finance. (2012). To the resident. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Parliamentary Debates, 25, 1967; 59, 1992; 63, 1994; 66, 1996; 70, 1999; 86, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Plate, T. (2010). Conversations with Lee Kuan Yew: Citizen Singapore: How to build a nation. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.Google Scholar
  25. Poon, K. K. (2012). The education of children with special needs: History, trends and future directions. In J. Tan (Ed.), Education in Singapore: Taking stock, looking forward (pp. 101–111). Singapore: Pearson.Google Scholar
  26. Quek, T. (2005, February 13). China whiz kids: S’pore feels the heat. The Straits Times, 3–4.Google Scholar
  27. Saw, S. H. (2012). The population of Singapore (3rd ed.). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Singapore Government. (1958). Singapore (Constitution) Order in Council, 1958. Singapore: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  29. Tan, J. (1993). Independent schools in Singapore: Implications for social and educational inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development, 13, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan, J. (2008). The marketisation of education in Singapore. In J. Tan, & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 19–38). Singapore: Pearson.Google Scholar
  31. Tan, J. (2009). Private tutoring in Singapore: Bursting out of the shadows. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tharman, S. (2012). Transcript of remarks by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Finance & Minister for Manpower at the PPIS 60th anniversary charity gala dinner. http://www.mof.gov.sg. Accessed 28 June 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Policy and Leadership StudiesNational Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations