An Empire Divided: French Natural Philosophy (1670–1690)

  • Sophie RouxEmail author
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 282)


For some 30 years, historians of science and philosophy working on the seventeenth century have endeavored to blur the edges of an opposition that had until then been generally accepted, namely, between the “new philosophy” on [the] one hand and an “old philosophy” on the other. In a nutshell, this generally received opposition was based on the idea that there had been a Scientific Revolution in the seventeenth century that consisted not only of the appearance of new sciences or of the discovery of new results in old sciences, but also of a change in the very principles of natural philosophy. From an ontological viewpoint in particular, the “new philosophers” had the right idea of substituting the clear principles of matter and motion for the old obscure entities that were the various occult qualities, substantial forms and virtues of all sorts. And thanks to these new ontological principles, which earned the new philosophers who defended them the title of “mechanical philosophers,” it became possible to begin truly to explain natural phenomena and the triumphal road to modern physics was opened.


Seventeenth Century Mechanical Explanation Scientific Revolution Modern Philosopher Family Resemblance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Grenoble II/Institut universitaire de FranceGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations