Skip to main content

Income and Poverty Among Older Koreans: Relative Contributions of and Relationship Between Public and Family Transfers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Studies in Population ((ISIP,volume 100))

Abstract

We examine the economic well-being of the Korean elderly and their reliance on public and private transfers. Underdeveloped public transfer programmes are at the centre of heated political debates, and a better understanding of economic well-being and the relation between public and private transfers will provide further insights in evaluating policy reform proposals under consideration. Using data from the 2006 and 2008 Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging organised by the Korea Labor Institute (KLI), we find that the elderly poverty rate between 2006 and 2008 decreased significantly but was still significantly higher than that of other OECD countries. This poverty reduction did not benefit individuals who were older, less educated, living alone, living in rural areas, or in poor health. We find that low-income elderly who co-reside depend almost completely on the income of their children or other household members. Public transfers account for no more than a third of income for low-income elderly, while private transfers account for half. Our analysis suggests that crowding-out is not a real concern in increasing welfare transfers for the low-income elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    And also in 2006 (Lee and Lee 2009).

  2. 2.

    A special-occupation employee, such as a miner or a fisherman, is eligible for a pension between ages 55 and 60.

References

  • Altonji, J. G., & Villanueva, E. (2003). The marginal propensity to spend on adult children (Working Paper 9811). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1985). The strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1045–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, R., & Smeeding, T. M. (1996). Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the U.S. using alternative equivalence scales. Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1988). The effects of fiscal policies when incomes are uncertain: A contradiction to Ricardian equivalence. American Economic Review, 78(1), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, M. F., & Mira D’Ercole, M. (2005). Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries in the second half of the 1990s (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper, No. 77). Paris: OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour, and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. (1969). Comment on measuring the size of the low-income population. In L. Stoltow (Ed.), Six papers on the size distribution of wealth and income (pp. 198–202). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J. (2005). Measuring poverty: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Measurement, 3, 199–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2007). Intergenerational transfers and old-age income security in Korea, Monograph. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I. K., & Choe, E. H. (1992). Support exchange patterns of the elderly in the Republic of Korea. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 3, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLoSA, Korean Longitudinal Study on Aging. (2008). Korea Labor Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNSO, Korea National Statistical Office. (2009). Korea statistical information service. Retrieved on March 13, 2009, from http://www.kosis.kr/

  • Kwon, S. (2001). Economic crisis and social policy reform in Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 10, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2010). Data set for pension and health: Data collection and sharing for policy design. International Social Security Review, 63(3–4), 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2009). Old-age income security and private transfers in Korea. Journal of Population Aging and Social Policy, 21(4), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Smith, J. P. (2009). Work, retirement, and depression. Journal of Population and Aging, 2, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levande, D. I., Herrick, J. M., & Sung, K. (2000). Eldercare in the United States and South Korea: Balancing family and community support. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 632–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., Augustyniak, S., & Duncan, G. J. (1985). Panel data and models of change: A comparison of first difference and conventional two-wave models. Social Science Research, 14, 80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, K. (2000). Testing parental altruism: Implications of a dynamic model (Working Paper). Los Angeles: Department of Economics, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPS, National Pension Service. (2010). Retrieved on December 12, 2010, from http://www.nps.or.kr/jsppage/etc/data/data01_01.jsp

  • OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). OECD-StatExtracts. Retrieved on December 10, 2010, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx

  • Park, N. H., Yeo, Y. J., Kim, K. Y., Lim, W. S., Song, Y. K., & Park, S. Y. (2003). The status of poverty policy and development: Focus on income security (Research Report 2003–11). Seoul: Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T. (2005). Poor people in rich nations: The United States in comparative perspective (Working Paper 419). Luxembourg: Income Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K. (1995). Measures and dimensions of filial piety in Korea. The Gerontologist, 35, 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K. (2000). Respect for elders: Myths and realities in East Asia. Journal of Aging and Identity, 5, 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO, World Health Organization. (2009). World Health Organization InfoBase. Retrieved on April 11, 2009, from http://apps.who.int/infobase

  • Yang, L., & Tsiatis, A. A. (2001). Efficiency study of estimators for a treatment effect in a pretest-posttest trial. The American Statistician, 55, 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D. R. (2011). The Korean economic adjustment to the world financial crisis. Asian Economic Papers, 10(1), 106–127. doi:10.1162/ASEP_a_00058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Grech, A. G., & Fuchs, M. (2006). Pension policy in EU25 and its possible impact on elderly poverty (Working Paper Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, CASE/116). London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health: P01 AG022481 International Comparisons of Well-Being, Health and Retirement and R01 AG030153 Integrating Informaiton about Aging Surveys.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinkook Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J., Phillips, D. (2012). Income and Poverty Among Older Koreans: Relative Contributions of and Relationship Between Public and Family Transfers. In: De Santis, G. (eds) The Family, the Market or the State?. International Studies in Population, vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4339-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics