Advertisement

Preliminary Overview of Late Cretaceous Turtle Diversity in Eastern Central Europe (Austria, Hungary, and Romania)

  • Márton Rabi
  • Mátyás Vremir
  • Haiyan Tong
Chapter
Part of the Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology book series (VERT)

Abstract

A preliminary overview of the relatively poorly known Late Cretaceous turtle faunas from eastern Central Europe is given, including brief descriptions both of historically significant and of more recently collected taxa and specimens from the Santonian-Campanian of Hungary, the Campanian of Austria, and the Maastrichtian of Romania. Eastern Central European Late Cretaceous turtle faunas are similar to contemporaneous Western European faunas in their low taxonomic diversity and in being composed almost exclusively of continental forms that are considered endemic to Europe. The eastern Central European fauna includes two pleurodire lineages: the primitive Dortokidae, represented by a separate regional lineage that includes Dortokidae gen. et sp. nov. from the Maastrichtian of Transylvania (Romania) and other indeterminate dortokids from the Santonian of Hungary and Campanian of Austria; and the Bothremydidae, represented by Foxemys sp., a member of the Foxemydina that otherwise is known only from Western Europe. Cryptodires are represented by a conservative turtle, Kallokibotion bajazidi (Nopcsa, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 79:100–116, 1923a), from the Maastrichtian of Transylvania and by other previously unknown or unrecognised, closely related taxa from the Santonian of Hungary and the Campanian of Austria. The absence of Kallokibotion in Western Europe, coupled with the presence in both regions of the bothremydid Foxemys and of separate dortokid lineages, indicate that turtle faunas in Western and eastern Central Europe were partially separated from one another during the Late Cretaceous. “Senonemys suemegensis” (Bohn, Földtani Közlöny 96:111–118, 1966) is the only turtle known from Upper Cretaceous marine rocks in eastern Central Europe, but because the material was not adequately described and it now appears to be lost, the identity and relationships of this taxon remain unknown. Many of the turtle-bearing localities in eastern Central Europe show differences in the relative abundances of specimens and faunal compositions that likely are due to a combination of ecological and biogeographical factors and regional extinctions.

Keywords

Austria  Bothremydidae  Cryptodira  Dortokidae  Europe Foxemys Fossil turtles Hungary  Kallokibotion Late Cretaceous Pleurodira  Romania 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Jim Gardner for the invitation to contribute to this volume and for carefully checking and correcting several versions of the manuscript. Zoltán Csiki, Igor Danilov, and Massimo Delfino are thanked for their constructive reviews. Zoltán Csiki also assisted MR and MV in studying the turtle collection of the University of Bucharest. Vlad Codrea is thanked for providing access to the turtle material at the Babes-Bolyai University (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). Fieldwork in Iharkút was suppored by the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA T–38045, PD 73021), the Jurassic Foundation, the Hantken Foundation, and the Pro Renovanda Cultura Hungariae Foundation. This project also was funded by the Synthesys Program, the SECyT-NKTH, and the Eötvös Loránd University.

References

  1. Anquetin, J., Barret, P., Jones, M. E. H., Moore-Fay, S., & Evans, S. E. (2009). A new stem turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Scotland: New insights into the evolution and paleoecology of basal turtles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 879–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antunes, M. T., & De Broin, F. (1988). Le Crétacé terminal de Beira Litoral, Portugal: Remarques stratigraphiques et écologiques, étude complémentaire de Rosasia soutoi (Chelonii, Bothremydidae). Ciências da Terra, 9, 153–200.Google Scholar
  3. Averianov, A. O., & Yarkov, A. A. (2004). New turtle remains from the Late Cretaceous and Paleogene of Volgograd region, Russia. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 11, 41–50.Google Scholar
  4. Baur, G. (1891). Notes on some little known American fossil tortoises. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 43, 411–430.Google Scholar
  5. Bohn, P. (1966). Senonemys sümegensis nov. gen., nov. sp. – ein neuer Schildkrötenfund aus Ungarn. Földtani Közlöny, 96, 111–118.Google Scholar
  6. Buffetaut, E. (1979). Revision der Crocodylia (Reptilia) aus den Gosau-Schichten (Ober-Kreide) von Österreich. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich, 6, 89–105.Google Scholar
  7. Buffetaut, E. (2005). Late Cretaceous vertebrates from the Saint-Chinian area (Southern France): A review of previous research and an update of recent finds. Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, 5, 39–48.Google Scholar
  8. Buffetaut, E., Costa, G., Le Loeuff, J., Martin, M., Rage, J.-C., Valentin, X., et al. (1996). An early campanian vertebrate fauna from the Villeveyrac Basin (Hérault, southern France). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 1996, 1–16.Google Scholar
  9. Buffetaut, E., Le Loeuff, J., Tong, H., Duffaud, S., Cavin, L., Garcia, G., et al. (1999). Un nouveau gisement de vertébrés du Crétacé supérieur à Cruzy (Hérault, Sud de la France). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes, 328, 203–208.Google Scholar
  10. Bunzel, E. (1871). Die Reptilfauna der Gosau-Formation in der Neuen Welt bei Wiener-Neustadt. Abhandlungen der Geologische Reichsanstalt, 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Codrea, V., & Dica, P. (2005). Upper Cretaceous-lowermost Miocene lithostratigraphic units in Alba Iulia-Sebeş-Vintu de Jos area (SW Transylvanian Basin). Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Geologia, 50, 19–26.Google Scholar
  12. Codrea, V., & Vremir, M. (1997). Kallokibotion bajazidi Nopcsa (Testudines, Kallokibotidae) in the Red Strata of Râpa Roşie - Sebeş (Alba county). Sargetia, Acta Musei Devensis, seria Stiintele Naturii, 17, 233–238.Google Scholar
  13. Codrea, V., Smith, T., Dica, P., Folie, A., Garcia, G., Godefroit, P., et al. (2002). Dinosaur egg nests, mammals and other vertebrates from a new Maastrichtian site of the Hateg Basin (Romania). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 1, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Codrea, V., Murzea-Jipa, C., & Venczel, M. (2008). A sauropod vertebra at Râpa Roşie (Alba district). Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, 6, 43–48.Google Scholar
  15. Codrea, V., Vremir, M., Jipa, C., Godefroit, P., Csiki, Z., Smith, T., et al. (2010). More than just Nopcsa’s Transylvanian dinosaurs: A look outside the Haţeg Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 293, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Company, J. (2004). Vertebrados continentales del Cretácico Superior (Campaniense-Maastrichtiense) de Valencia (Ph.D. dissertation, Universitad de València, Valencia).Google Scholar
  17. Cope, E. D. (1864). On the limits and relations of the Raniformes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 16, 181–183.Google Scholar
  18. Cope, E. D. (1868). On the origin of genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 20, 242–300.Google Scholar
  19. Csiki, Z., Vremir, M., Brusatte, S., & Norell, M. (2010). An aberrant island-dwelling theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Romania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 15357–15361.Google Scholar
  20. de Lapparent de Broin, F. (2000). African chelonians from the Jurassic to the present: Phases of development and preliminary catalogue of the fossil record. Palaeontologia Africana, 36, 43–82.Google Scholar
  21. de Lapparent de Broin, F. (2001). The European turtle fauna from the Triassic to the Present. Dumerilia, 4(3), 155–216.Google Scholar
  22. de Lapparent de Broin, F., & Murelaga, X. (1996). Une nouvelle faune de chéloniens dans le Crétacé Supérieur européen. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Sér. IIA, 323, 729–735.Google Scholar
  23. de Lapparent de Broin, F., & Murelega, X. (1999). Turtles from the Upper Cretaceous of Laño (Iberian peninsula). Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava, 14 (Número Especial 1) 135–211.Google Scholar
  24. de Lapparent de Broin, F., & Werner, C. (1998). New Late Cretaceous turtles from the Western Desert, Egypt. Annales de Paleontologie, 84, 131–214.Google Scholar
  25. de Lapparent de Broin, F., Murelega Bereikua, X., & Codrea, V. (2004). Presence of Dortokidae (Chelonii, Pleurodira) in the earliest Tertiary of the Jibou Formation, Romania: Palaeobiogeographical implications. Acta Palaeontologica Romanie, 4, 203–215.Google Scholar
  26. Delfino, M., Codrea, V., Folie, A., Dica, P., Godefroit, P., & Smith, T. (2008). A complete skull of Allodaposuchus precedens NOPCSA, 1928 (Eusuchia) and a reassessment of the morphology of the taxon based on the Romanian remains. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 28, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Depecker, M., Berge, C., Penin, X., & Renous, S. (2006). Geometric morphometrics of the shoulder in extant turtles (Chelonii). Journal of Anatomy, 208, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaffney, E. S. (1990). The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 194, 1–263.Google Scholar
  29. Gaffney, E. S., & Meylan, P. A. (1988). A phylogeny of turtles. In M. J. Benton (Ed.) The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods. Volume 1: Amphibians, reptiles, birds. Systematics association special volume, 35A (pp. 157–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gaffney, E. S., & Meylan, P. A. (1992). The Transylvanian turtle Kallokibotion, a primitive cryptodire of Cretaceous age. American Museum Novitates, 3040, 1–37.Google Scholar
  31. Gaffney, E. S., Tong, H., & Meylan, P. A. (2006). Evolution of the side-necked turtles: The families Bothremydidae, Euraxemydidae, and Araripemydidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 300, 1–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaffney, E. S., Rich, T. H., Vickers-Rich, P., Constantine, A., Vacca, R., & Kool, L. (2007). Chubutemys, a new eucryptodiran turtle from the Early Cretaceous of Argentina, and the relationships of the Meiolaniidae. American Museum Novitates, 3599, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. García, P. A., Ortega, F., & Murelaga, X. (2009). Una probable tortuga Pancryptodira del Cretácico Superior de Lo Hueco (Cuenca, España). Paleolusitana, 1, 365–371.Google Scholar
  34. García, P. A., Ortega, F., & Murelaga, X. (2010). Ampliación de la distribución geográfica y temporal de Elochelys convenarum (Chelonii, Bothremydidae) en el Cretácico Superior de la Península Ibérica. Ameghiniana, 47, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gemel, R., & Rauscher, K. (2000). Fossile Schildkröten aus Österreich. In Biologiezentrum des Ober Österreich. Landesmuseums (Hrsg.): Die Europäische Sumpfschildkröte (pp. 63–86), Stapfia 69, Neue Folge 149.Google Scholar
  36. Gheerbrant, E., Codrea, V., Hosu, A., Sen, S., Guernet, C., de Lapparent de Broin, F., et al. (1999–2000). Découverte en Transylvanie (Roumanie) de gisements à vertébrés dans les calcaires de Rona (Thanétien ou Sparnacien): Les plus anciens mammifères cénozoïques d’Europe Orientale. Eclogae Geoogicae Helvetiae, 1999, 92, 517–535.Google Scholar
  37. Grigorescu, D. (1983). Cadrul stratigrafic si paleoecologic al depozitelor continentale cu dinosaurieni din bazinul Haţeg. Sargetia, Acta Musei Devensis, seria Stiintele Naturii, 13, 37–47.Google Scholar
  38. Grigorescu, D. (1992). Nonmarine Cretaceous formations of Romania. In N. J. Mater & P. J. Chen (Eds.), Aspects of nonmarine cretaceous geology (pp. 142–164). Beijing: China Ocean Press.Google Scholar
  39. Grigorescu, D. (2010). The Latest Cretaceous fauna with dinosaurs and mammals from the Haţeg Basin—a historical overview. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 293, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Groza, I. (1983). Rezultatele preliminare ale cercetărilor intreprinse de către Muzeul judeţean Hunedoara—Deva în stratele cu dinosaurieni de la Sînpetru—Haţeg. Sargetia, Acta Musei Devensis, seria Stiintele Naturii, 13, 49–66.Google Scholar
  41. Haas, J. (1979). The Ugod Limestone Formation in the Bakony Mountains. Annals of the Hungarian Geological Institute, 61, 1–149.Google Scholar
  42. Herman, A. B., & Kvaček, J. (2007). Early Campanian Grünbach flora of Austria: Systematic composition and paleoclimatic interpretations. Acta Paleobotanica, 47, 37–55.Google Scholar
  43. Hirayama, R., Brinkman, D. B., & Danilov, I. G. (2000). Distribution and biogeography of non-marine Cretaceous turtles. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 7, 181–198.Google Scholar
  44. Jianu, C.-M., Mészáros, M., & Codrea, V. (1997). A new collection of Haţeg and Râpa Roşie material (Dinosauria, Crocodilia, Chelonia) in the Cluj-Napoca University. Sargetia, Acta Musei Devensis, seria Stiintele Naturi, 17, 219–232.Google Scholar
  45. Joyce, W. G. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships of Mesozoic turtles. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 48, 3–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Joyce, W. G., & Gauthier, J. A. (2004). Paleoecology of Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle origins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kadic, O. (1916). Jelentés az 1915, évben végzett ásatásaimról: II A valiorai dinosaurusok gyűjtése. A Magyar Királyi Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentések 1915-ről, 573–576.Google Scholar
  48. Knauer, J., & Siegl-Farkas, Á. (1992). Palynostatigraphic position of the Senonian beds overlying the Upper Cretaceous bauxite formations of the Bakony Mountains. Annual Report of the Hungarian Geological Institute, 1990, 463–471.Google Scholar
  49. Koch, A. (1900). A Magyar Korona országainak kövült gerincesállat maradványainak rendszeres átnézete. A Magyar Orvosi és Természettudományi Vizsgálatok Munkálatai, 1–538. Google Scholar
  50. Krézsek, C. S., & Bally, A. W. (2006). The Transylvanian basin (Romania) and its relation to the Carpathian fold and thrust belt: Insights in gravitational salt tectonics. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 23, 405–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kvaček, J., & Herman, A. (2004). The Campanian Grünbach flora of Lower Austria: Paleoecological interpretations. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 106A, 91–101.Google Scholar
  52. Laurent, Y., Tong, H., & Claude, J. (2002). New side-necked turtle (Pleurodira: Bothremydidae) from the Upper Maastrichtian of the Petites-Pyrénées (Haute-Garonne, France). Cretaceous Research, 23, 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae (10th ed., Vol. 1). Laurentii Sylvii. Google Scholar
  54. Lyson, T. R., & Joyce, W. G. (2009). Paleoecology of two stratigraphically equivalent Latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) turtle thanatocoenoses. Gaffney Turtle Symposium (October 17–18, 2009, Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller ). Abstract Volume, 107–114.Google Scholar
  55. Makádi, L. (2005). A new aquatic varanoid lizard from the Upper Cretaceous of Hungary. KaupiaDarmstädter Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte (Abstract Volume, 3rd Annual Meeting of the EAVP), 14, 127.Google Scholar
  56. Makádi, L., Botfalvai, G., & Ősi, A. (2006). Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fauna from the Bakony Mountains. I: Fishes, amphibians, turtles, lizards. Földtani Közlöny, 136, 487–502.Google Scholar
  57. Marmi, J., Vila, B., & Galobart, Á. (2009). Solemys (Chelonii, Solemydidae) remains from the Maastrichtian of Pyrenees: Evidence for a semi-aquatic lifestyle. Cretaceous Research, 30, 1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Matheron, P. (1869). Notice sur les reptiles fossiles des dé pots fluvio-lacustres crétacés du bassin à lignite de Fuveau. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences, Belle-Lettres et Arts de Marseille, 2(26), 781–795Google Scholar
  59. Młynarski, M. (1966). Die fossilen Schildkröten in dem Ungarischen Sammlungen. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 11, 223–288.Google Scholar
  60. Nopcsa, F. (1897). Vorlaufiger Bericht über das Auftreten oberer Kreide im Hatszeger Tale in Siebenbürgen. Verheindlung der Kaiserlischen und Königlischen Geologischen Reichs Anstalt, Vienna, 273–274.Google Scholar
  61. Nopcsa, F. (1905). A Gyulafehérvár, Déva, Ruszkabánya és a Romániai határ közé eső vidék geológiája. A Magyar Királyi Földtani Intézet Évkönyve, 14, 82–254.Google Scholar
  62. Nopcsa, F. (1923a). On the geological importance of the primitive reptilian fauna of the uppermost Cretaceous; with a description of a new tortoise (Kallokibotion). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 79, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nopcsa, F. (1923b). Kallokibotion, a primitive amphychelidean tortoise from the uppermost Cretaceous of Hungary. Paleontologia Hungarica, 1, 1–34.Google Scholar
  64. Nopcsa, F. (1926). Die Reptilien der Gosau in neuer Beleuchtung. Centralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 15, 520–523.Google Scholar
  65. Nopcsa, F. (1928). Palaeontological notes on Reptilia. 7. Classification of the Crocodilia. Geologica Hungarica, Series Palaeontologica, 1, 75–84.Google Scholar
  66. Nopcsa, F. (1931). Note préliminaire sur quelques tortues du Danien du Midi de la France. Annales de Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Marseille, 22, 109–113.Google Scholar
  67. Ősi, A., & Mindszenty, A. (2009). Iharkút, Dinosaur-bearing alluvial complex of the Csehbánya Formation. In E. Babinszky (Ed.) Cretaceous sediments of the Transdanubian range. Field guide of the geological excursion organized by the Sedimentological Subcommission of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Hungarian Geological Society (pp. 51–63). Budapest: Hungarian Geological Institute. Google Scholar
  68. Ősi, A., & Rabi, M. (2006). The Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fauna from the Bakony Mountains II: Crocodiles, dinosaurs (Theropoda, Aves, Ornithischia), pterosaurs. Földtani Közlöny, 136, 503–526.Google Scholar
  69. Pereda-Suberbiola, X. (2009). Biogeographical affinities of Late Cretaceous continental tetrapods of Europe: A review. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 180, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pereda-Suberbiola, X., & Galton, P. (2001). Reappraisal of the nodosaurid ankylosaur Struthiosaurus austriacus Bunzel from the Upper Cretaceous Gosau Beds of Austria. In K. Carpenter (Ed.), The armored dinosaurs (pp. 173–210). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Pérez-Garcia, A., Ortega, F., & Murelaga, X. (2010). Systematics of the European Upper Cretaceous turtle Elochelys (Panpleurodira, Bothremydidae). 8th Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Aix-en Provence, Abstract Volume, 68.Google Scholar
  72. Rabi M. (2009). An update of Late Cretaceous chelonians and crocodilians from Central Europe. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29 (Suppl 6), 168A.Google Scholar
  73. Rabi, M., & Botfalvai, G. (2006). A new bothremydid (Chelonia: Pleurodira) fossil assemblage from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) of Hungary—additional studies in historical paleobiogeography of Late Cretaceous bothremydids. Hantkeniana, 5 (4th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Abstract Volume), 61–65.Google Scholar
  74. Rabi, M., & Tong, H. (2007). Shell reconstruction of the bothremydid turtle (Testudines: Pleurodira) from the Late Cretaceous of Iharkút, Hungary. 5th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Abstract Volume, 49–50.Google Scholar
  75. Rabi, M., Tong, H., & Botfalvai, G. (in review). A new species of the side-necked turtle Foxemys (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Hungary and the historical biogeography of the Bothremydini. Geological Magazine.Google Scholar
  76. Rothschild, B., Schultze, H.-P., & Pellegrini, R. (2012). Osseous and other hard tissue pathologies in turtles and abnormalities of mineral deposition. In D. B. Brinkman, P. A. Holroyd & J. D. Gardner (Eds.), Morphology and evolution of turtles (pp. XXX–XXX). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Sachs, S., & Hornung, J. (2006). Juvenile ornithopod (Dinosauria: Rhabdodontiidae) remains from the Upper Cretaceous (Lower Campanian Gosau Group) of Muthmannsdorf (Lower Austria). Geobios, 39, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Săndulescu, M. (1984). Geotectonica României. Bucureşti: Editura Tehnică.Google Scholar
  79. Scheyer, T. M., & Sander, P. M. (2007). Shell bone histology of turtles indicates terrestrial paleoecology of basal turtles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 1885–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Seeley, H. G. (1881). The reptile fauna of the Gosau Formation preserved in the Geological Museum of the University of Vienna. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 3, 620–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sterli, J. (2008). A new, nearly complete stem turtle from the Jurassic of South America with implications for turtle evolution. Biology Letters, 4, 286–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Summesberger, H., Machalski, M., & Wagreich, M. (2007). First record of the Late Campanian heteromorph ammonite Nostoceras hyatti from the Alpine Cretaceous (Grünbach, Gosau Group, Lower Austria). Acta Paleontologica Polonica, 57, 443–451.Google Scholar
  83. Szalai, T. (1934). Die fossilen schildkröten Ungarns. Folia Zoologica et Hydrobiologica, 6(2), 97–192.Google Scholar
  84. Szalai, E. (2005). Paleomagnetic studies in Iharkút. Manuscript, Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Environmental Geology, Budapest.Google Scholar
  85. Thenius, E. (1962). Niederösterreich im Wandel der Zeiten. Grundzüge der Erd- und Lebensgeschichte von Niederösterreich. 2. Auflage, 1–126.Google Scholar
  86. Therrien, F. (2005). Palaeoenvironments of the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) dinosaurs of Romania: Insights from fluvial deposits and paleosols of the Transylvanian and Haţeg basins. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 218, 15–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Therrien, F., Jianu, C.-M., Scarlat, B., Weishampel, D. B., & King, J. W. (2002). Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of latest Cretaceous dinosaur-bearing formations of Romania: Preliminary results. Sargetia, Acta Musei Devensis, seria Stiintele Naturii, 19, 33–59.Google Scholar
  88. Tong, H., & Gaffney, E. S. (2000). Description of the skull of Polysternon provinciale (Matheron, 1869), a side-necked turtle (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Villeveyrac, France. Oryctos, 3, 9–18.Google Scholar
  89. Tong, H., Gaffney, E. S., & Buffetaut, E. (1998). Foxemys, a new side-necked turtle (Bothremydidae: Pelomedusoides) from the Late Cretaceous of France. American Museum Novitates, 3251, 1–19.Google Scholar
  90. Tortosa, T., Dutour, Y., Cheylan, G., Tong, H., & Buffetaut, E. (2009). New Late Cretaceous dinosaur localities in Provence (southeastern France). 7th Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Berlin, Abstract Volume, 65.Google Scholar
  91. Van Itterbeeck, J., Săsăran, E., Codrea, V., Săsăran, L., & Bultynck, P. (2004). Sedimentology of the Upper Cretaceous mammal- and dinosaur-bearing sites along the Râul Mare and Barbat rivers, Haţeg Basin, Romania. Cretaceous Research, 25, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vremir, M. (2001). Palaeontology, palaeoecology and taphonomy of the Late Cretaceous macrovertebrates of Alba Iulia-Sebeş area (Transylvania). M.Sc. thesis, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.Google Scholar
  93. Vremir, M. (2004). Fossil turtle found in Romania—overview. Annals of the Hungarian Geological Institute, 2002, 143–152.Google Scholar
  94. Vremir, M. (2010). New faunal elements from the late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) continental deposits of Sebeş area (Transylvania). Terra Sebus. Acta Musei Sabesiensis, 2, 635–684.Google Scholar
  95. Vremir, M., & Codrea, V. (2002). The first Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) dinosaur footprints from Transylvania (Romania). Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Geologia, 2, 27–36.Google Scholar
  96. Vremir, M., & Codrea, V. (2009). Late Cretaceous turtle diversity in Transylvanian and Haţeg basins (Romania). The 7th International Symposium of Paleontology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Abstract Volume, 122–124.Google Scholar
  97. Vremir, M., Unwin, D. M., & Codrea, V. (2009). A giant Azhdarchid (Reptilia, Pterosauria) and other Upper Cretaceous reptiles from Râpa Roşie-Sebeş (Transylvanian basin, Romania) with a reassessment of the age of theSebeş Formation”. The 7th International Symposium of Paleontology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Abstact Volume, 125–128.Google Scholar
  98. Vullo, R., Néraudeau, D., Allain, R., & Cappetta, H. (2005). Un nouveau gisement à microrestes de vertébrés continentaux et littoraux dans le Cénomanien inférieur de Fouras (Charente-Maritime, Sud-Ouest de la France). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 4, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vullo, R., Neraudeau, D., & Lenglet, T. (2007). Dinosaur teeth from the Cenomanian of Charentes, western France: Evidence for a mixed Laurasian-Gondwanan assemblage. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27, 931–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vullo, R., Lapparent de Broin, F., Néraudeau, D., & Durrieu, N. (2010). Turtles from the Early Cenomanian paralic deposits (Late Cretaceous) of Charentes, France. Oryctos, 9, 37–48.Google Scholar
  101. Wellnhofer, P. (1980). Flugsaurierreste aus der Gosau-Kreide von Muthmannsdorf (Niederösterreich)—ein Beitrag zurKiefermechanik der Pterosaurier. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geologie, 20, 95–112.Google Scholar
  102. Willingshofer, E., Andriessen, P., Cloething, S., & Neubauer, F. (2001). Detrital fission track thermochronology of Upper Cretaceous syn-orogenic sediments in the South Carpathians (Romania): Inferences on the tectonic evolution of a collisional hinterland. Basin Research, 13, 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zalmout, I. S., Mustafa, H. A., & Wilson, J. A. (2005). Karkaemys arabicus, a new side-necked turtle (Pleurodira, Bothremydidae) from the Upper Cretaceous Wadi Umm Ghudran Formation of Karak, Jordan. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology of the University of Michigan, 31, 155–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PaleontologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Natural SciencesTransylvanian Museum SocietyCluj-NapocaRomania
  3. 3.Le Kremlin-BicêtreFrance
  4. 4.Division of PaleontologyAmerican Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations