Skip to main content

Education for Sustainability in the K-12 Educational System of the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Schooling for Sustainable Development in Canada and the United States

Part of the book series: Schooling for Sustainable Development ((SSDE,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter describes the evolution and current status of education for sustainability (EfS) in the K-12 school system of the United States. We briefly review the major educational and political movements that set the stage for contemporary EfS in the United States. In particular, we describe how the guiding concept of sustainability vanished and reemerged from discussions about education in the early years of the twenty-first century. We outline the national and state policy landscape and discuss the unusual role of educational nonprofits in shaping policy. Then, drawing on the available research literature and on illustrative examples from educational practice, we discuss the nascent strengths and formidable challenges facing EfS in US public schools. Throughout the chapter, we focus particular attention on the contribution of environmental education to EfS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Charter schools are public primary or secondary schools, which are not subject to all of the rules and regulations that apply to other public schools. Charter schools are accountable for producing results set forth in each school’s charter. Charter schools have open enrolment and are attended by choice. Charter schools are not allowed to charge tuition. State-level legislation allows or disallows establishing charter schools.

  2. 2.

    Most studies relied on post-only comparisons between intact groups and inadequately established the comparability of comparison groups.

  3. 3.

    EBE is also referred to as EIC: Environment as an Integrating ContextTM.

References

  • Archie, M. (2011). Reinventing the wheel: Next steps in building comprehensive state and provincial EE programs. http://cms.eetap.org/repository/moderncms_documents/comprehensive_ee_article_final_2.24_sm.2.pdf

  • Athman, J., & Monroe, M. (2004). The effects of environment-based education on students’ achievement motivation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 9(1), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, P. F. (2005). Developing sustainable schools. Independent Schools, 64(3), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment. (2006). Green schools: Attributes for health and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. G. (2007). Expanding the field: Revisiting environmental education principles through multidisciplinary frameworks. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(2), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Sanders, D., Teamey, K., & Benefield, P. (2003). Improving the understanding of food, farming and land management amongst school-age children: A literature review. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, M., Murphy, M., & Johnson, B. (2008). Quantifying a relationship between place-based learning and environmental quality. Woodstock, VT: NPS Conservation Study Institute in cooperation with the Environmental Protection Agency and Shelburne Farms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A. (2010, September 21). The greening of the Department of Education: Secretary Duncan’s remarks at the Sustainability Summit, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/greening-department-education-secretary-duncans-remarks-sustainability-summit

  • Edwards, B. W. (2006). Environmental design and educational performance. Research in Education, 76, 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falco, E. (2004). Environment-based education: Improving attitudes and academics of adolescents. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, N., Jacobi, P., & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (in press). The evolution of education for sustainable development and climate change education in the context of decentralized governance. Environmental Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Schools Alliance. (2009). About us. Retrieved from http://www.greenschoolsalliance.org/about/index.html

  • Huckle, J. (2009). Consulting the UK ESD community on an ESD indicator to recommend to the government: An insight into the micro-politics of ESD. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., Volk, T. L., & Ramsey, J. M. (2000). Instructional impacts of environmental education on citizenship behavior and academic achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, M. (2010, September 20). Citizenship and pathways for a green economy: Remarks by Under Secretary Martha Kanter at the Sustainability Summit, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/citizenship-and-pathways-green-economy-remarks-under-secretary-martha-kanter-sustainab

  • Kushmeric, A., Young, L., & Stein, S. E. (2007). Environmental justice content in mainstream US, 6–12 environmental education guides. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. (1996). Wisconsin EE mandates: The bad news and the good news. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, G. A., & Hoody, L. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environmental Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, C. (1999). The U.S. President’s Council on Sustainable Development: A case study. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE  ≠  ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Environmental Education Advancement Project. (1995). Status of comprehensive state environmental education programs: Description and breakdown by state. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/neeap/research/StatusofEE/breakdow.htm

  • National Environmental Education Advancement Project. (2005). Results of the 2004–2005 NEEAP survey of state EE programs. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.naaee.org/about-naaee/affiliates/the-neeap-states-survey/

  • National Environmental Education Advisory Council. (2005). Setting the standard, measuring results, celebrating successes. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. (2000). Environment-based education: Creating high performance schools and students. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Department of Education. (2011). About the sustainability teams. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://schools.nyc.gov/community/facilities/sustainability/about

  • Nolet, V. (2009). Preparing sustainably-literate teachers. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Association for Environmental Education. (2004a). The environmental education collection: A review of resources for educators. Washington, DC: NAAEE–North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Association for Environmental Education. (2004b). Environmental education materials: Guidelines for excellence. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Association for Environmental Education. (2011). Advocacy for environmental education. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.naaee.net/advocacy

  • Ozer, E. (2007). The effects of school gardens on students and schools: Conceptualization and considerations for maximizing healthy development. Health Education & Behavior, 34(6), 846–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council on Sustainable Development. (1996). Education for sustainability: An agenda for action. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://ffof.org/pcsd/

  • Promise of Place. (2009). What is place-based education? Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://www.promiseofplace.org/

  • Rode, H., & Michelsen, G. (2008). Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Grants awarded since 1992. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from http://www.epa.gov/education/grants/index.html

  • Vermont Education for Sustainability. (2000). Education for sustainability in Vermont—History. Retrieved from http://www.vtefs.org/about/index.html

  • Volk, T. L., & Cheak, M. J. (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents and community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(5), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2011). Education for environment and sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us/EnvironmentSustainability/

  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1998). Wisconsin’s model academic standards for environmental education (Bulletin No. 9001) Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2008). PI 34.05§ 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noah Weeth Feinstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feinstein, N.W., Carlton, G. (2013). Education for Sustainability in the K-12 Educational System of the United States. In: McKeown, R., Nolet, V. (eds) Schooling for Sustainable Development in Canada and the United States. Schooling for Sustainable Development, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4273-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics