Advertisement

Is Hammarby Sjöstad a Model Case? Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in Stockholm, Sweden

  • Bo Grönlund
Chapter

Abstract

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) claims to reduce crime and fear of crime through urban design and planning. If it does, it ought to be part of the sustainable planning and design of cities. This chapter gives an overview of the development of CPTED principles and then uses the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) guidelines to assess the case study of Hammarby Sjöstad – a residential area in Stockholm, the capital of Sweden. Urban planning and urban design principles are assessed from a CPTED point of view. Crime statistics as well as data on perceived safety of residents of Hammarby Sjöstad are compared with other areas in Stockholm. This chapter concludes that CPTED guidelines are met to a large degree: crime rates are relatively lower and perceived safety is higher in Hammarby Sjöstad than Stockholm’s average. Finally, the role of CPTED versus other factors when planning sustainable areas is discussed, as well as the need to strengthen the routines for consideration and suitable implementation of CPTED in a Northern European welfare society context.

Keywords

Crime Prevention Social Housing Housing Development Crime Statistic Urban Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Roya Bamzar, Matthew Biniyam Kursah and Pouriya Parsanezhad for collecting the data on Hammarby Sjöstad pedestrian and bicycle traffic presented in Table 12.3.

References

  1. APA – American Planning Association. (2005). Policy guide on security, adopted and ratified by APA, 2005. http://www.planning.org/policy/guides/pdf/security.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  2. Balvig, F., & Kyvsgaard, B. (2010). Udsathed for vold og andre former for kriminalitet, Offerundersøgelserne 2005–2009 med delvis opdatering for 2010, November 2010, Københavns Universitet, Justitsministeriet.Google Scholar
  3. Boverket. (1998). Brott, bebyggelse och planering http://www.boverket.se/Global/Webbokhandel/Dokument/1998/brott_bebyggelse_och_planering.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  4. Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. British Standards Institution. (1986). British standard guide for: Security of buildings against Crime, Part 1, Dwellings, London. BS 8220–1:1986, British Standards.Google Scholar
  6. Cederquist, B. (2000). Kan stadens form främja trygghet?, Plan 5–6/2000 (Can the city promote safety, the Swedish journal of planning ‘Plan’).Google Scholar
  7. Cederquist, B. (2010a). Hammarby Sjöstad facts and figures http://www.stockholm.se/PageFiles/161609/Facts and figures march 2010.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  8. Cederquist, B. (2010b). Interview about the development of Hammarby Sjöstad.Google Scholar
  9. CEN/TR 14383–2. (2007). Prevention of crime – Urban planning and building design – Part 2: Urban planning http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/TechnicalCommitteesWorkshops/CENTechnicalCommittees/Pages/Standards.aspx?param=6306&title=Prevention%20of%20crime%20by%20urban%20planning%20and%20building%20design. Assessed Sept 2011.
  10. Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (1993). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. Advances in Theoretical Criminology: Routine Activity and Rational Choice, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, A. (1985). Utopia on trail vision and reality in planned housing. London: Hillary Shipman Limited.Google Scholar
  13. Colquhoun, I. (2004). Designing out crime, Creating Safe and Sustainable Communities. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coy, M. (2006). Gated communities and urban fragmentation in Latin America: The Brazilian experience. Geoforum, 66, 121–132.Google Scholar
  15. Cozens, P. M., Saville, G., & Hillier, D. (2005). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) – A review and modern bibliography. Property Management, 23(5), 328–356.Google Scholar
  16. Eriksson, T. (2010). Trygghet i boendet. Stiftelsen Tryggare Sverige and Jure AB, Stockholm. http://www.jm.se/upload/OmJM/Nyhetsrum/pressmeddelande/Trygghet.i.boendet.inlaga.ej.utfall.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  17. Fränne, L. (2007). Hammarby Sjöstad – A unique environmental project in Stockholm, GlashusEtt. http://www.hammarbysjostad.se/inenglish/pdf/HS_miljo_bok_eng_ny.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  18. Gatu- och fastighetskontoret, Stockholms stad, juni. (2004). (Lotta Magnusson, ed.), Boendes Livsmiljö i en citynära stadsdel – exempel Hammarby Sjöstad.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, J., & Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 31(6), 913–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grönlund, B. (1998). Checklist for CPTED notations on plans and drawings. in Police Authority, Stockholm County (2005). Bo Tryggt 05, part B7.Google Scholar
  21. Grönlund, B. (2005). Urban planning for good urban living. In B. Persson (Ed.), Sustainable city of tomorrow – Bo01 – Experiences of a Swedish housing exposition. Stockholm: Formas, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Grönlund, B. (2006). Att bygga för trygghet – exemplet Sundbyberg. In B. Larsson, & L. My (Eds.), Tankar om förstadens framtid. Stockholm: Formas, 2005.Google Scholar
  23. Grönlund, B. (2007). Some notions of urbanity. Conference contribution to the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium 2007 in Istanbul. http://www.re-ad.dk/files/32933817/SSS6_gronlund_poster_screen.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  24. Grönlund, B. (2008). Sammenhænge mellem arkitektur og kriminalitet. In N. Bjørn (Ed.), Arkitektur der forandrer – fra ghetto til velfungerende byområde. København: Gads Forlag, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. Grönlund, B. (2009). Brottsförebyggande stads- och bebyggelseplanering. In Y. Lindgren, et al. (Eds.), Stora Trygghetsboken. Stockholm: Jure Förlag AB, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Hillier, B. (1988). Against enclosure. Rehumanising housing. M. T. W. T. Teymur N. London: Butterworths, pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
  27. Hillier, B. (2004). Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International, 9(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillier, B., & Shu, S. (2000). Crime and urban layout: the need for evidence. In S. Ballintyne, K. Pease, & V. McLaren (Eds.), Secure foundations: Key issues in crime prevention, crime reduction and community safety. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
  29. ICA. (2010). The International CPTED Association, http://www.cpted.net/. Assessed Sept 2011.
  30. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities – The failure of town planning. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Jeffery, C. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Jencks, C. (1977). The language of post-modern architecture. London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  33. Jonasson, A. (2009). Speech and powerpoint presented at the local Nacka Crime Prevention Conference, 15 October 2009.Google Scholar
  34. Landman, K., & du Plessis, C. (2007). The impact of gated communities on urban sustainability: A difference of opinion or a matter of concern? SA Town and Regional Planning, 51(May), 16–25.Google Scholar
  35. Lind, J. (2001). Bygg bort brott, En studie i bebyggelseplanering mot brott. Polismyndigheten i Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  36. Malm, U. (2010). Crime data 2008 for parts of Stockholm. http://insyn.stockholm.se/skarpnack/document/2010–03–25/Dagordning/63/§%2063%20Minnesanteckningar%20SkarpBrå%2010–02–15.pdf. Assessed in Sept 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Moffat, R. (1983), Crime prevention through environmental design – a management perspective. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25(4), 19–31.Google Scholar
  38. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space – Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  39. Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/pdf/def.pdf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  40. Norrby, A. (1998). Bygg bort brotten – är det möjligt(on Hammarby Sjöstad), Apropå, 3.Google Scholar
  41. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Office. (2004). Safer places – The planning system and crime prevention. Tonbridge: Thomas Telford Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Persson, B. (Ed.). (2005). Sustainable city of tomorrow – Bo01 – Experiences of a Swedish housing exposition. Stockholm: Formas.Google Scholar
  43. Police Authority, Stockholm County. (2005). Bo Tryggt 05 – Handbook for Crime Prevention and Security Enhancement in Homes and Residential Areas. (English translation 2006). http://www.botryggt.se/english/POLIS_MAIN.swf. Assessed Sept 2011.
  44. Raco, M. (2007). Securing sustainable communities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roth, N., & Sandahl, J. (2008). Trygg i Stockholm 2008. Socialtjänstförvaltningen, Stockholms Stad. http://www.stockholm.se/Fristaende-webbplatser/Fackforvaltningssajter/Socialtjanstforvaltningen/Forebyggande-arbete/Kunskapsbaserad-prevention/Trygg-i-Stockholm/. Assessed Sept 2011.
  46. Rubenstein, H., Murray, C., Motoyama, T., & Rouse, W. V. (1980). The link between crime and the built environment – The current state of knowledge. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. Rydberg, A. (2010). Interview with the police officer Anders Rydberg (‘BoTryggt’).Google Scholar
  48. Saville, G., & Cleveland, G. (1997). Second-generation CPTED in schools. Paper presented at the 1st Annual International CPTED Association Conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  49. Saville, G., & Cleveland, G. (2008). Second-generation CPTED: The rise and fall of opportunity theory. In R. Atlas (Ed.), 21st century security and CPTED. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  50. Secured by Design, http://www.securedbydesign.com/index.aspx. Assessed Apr 2012.
  51. SBK. (1999). City Planning Office. Stockholm: Översiktsplan 1999.Google Scholar
  52. SBK. (2001). City Planning Office, Stockholm: Program för Nordvästra Kungsholmen, Sammanfattning ämnesvis av inkomna synpunkter under programsamråd jämte stadsbyggnadskontorets kommentarer S-Dp 1999–08608–53, 2001–11–27 Dp 1999–08608–53.Google Scholar
  53. Stockholm Police Headquarters. (2010). Crime statistics for Hammarby Sjöstad 2008.Google Scholar
  54. USA Today, US newspaper, 16 December 2002. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002–12–15-gated-usat_x.htm. Assessed Sept 2011.
  55. United Nations Human Settlement Program. (2007). Enhancing urban safety and security, UN-HABITAT. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  56. United Nations Human Settlement Program. (2009). Planning sustainable cities. UN-HABITAT. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  57. USK – Stockholm Statistical Office. (2009). Områdedata (District statistics). http://www.uskab.se/index.php/omradesvis-statistik.html. Assessed Sept 2011.
  58. Vestbro, D. U. (2005). Conflicting perspectives in the development of Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  59. Wallis, A., & Ford, D. (1980). Crime prevention through environmental design: An operational handbook. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, GPO.Google Scholar
  60. Wekerle, G., & Whitzman, C. (1995). Safe cities: Guidelines for planning design, and management. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  61. Zelinka, A., & Brennan, D. (2001). Safescape: Creating safer, more liveable communities through planning design. Chicago: Planners Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Planning, The School of ArchitectureThe Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and ConservationCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations