Advertisement

Reconciling the System World with the Life Worlds of Young Adults: Where Next for Youth Transition Policies?

  • Karen Evans
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter uses the evolving concept of bounded agency to assist a rethinking of social structures in relation to human aspiration and capacities for change. Empirical encounters with groups of 18- to 25-year-olds in Britain and internationally have formed the basis for extended dialogues between ideas and evidence in the search for new ways of conceptualising youth transitions. These explorations have taken place in contrasting societal contexts over several decades. A life-course framework is increasingly being used to explain youth transitions. The life-course approach understands the life-course as an interrelationship between individuals and society. It evolves “as a time–dependent, dynamic linkage between social structure, institutions and individual action from birth to death” (Heinz, Huinink, Swader, Weymann, General introduction. In Heinz WR, Huinink J, Weymann A (eds) The life course reader: individuals and societies across time. Campus Verlag GmbH, Frankfurt, p 15, 2009). From this standpoint, the chapter develops an analysis of the scope young adults have for fulfilling their aspirations, and how they strive for these aspirations through their work and learning. Asking how system worlds can be better reconciled with the life worlds of young people provides a starting point for debate on how bounds on human strivings and aspirations can be loosened to release creative potential and realise broader and fairer forms of meritocracy.

Keywords

Labour Market Young People Human Agency Transition Behaviour Labour Market Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

From 2008, further research on youth transitions has been supported through an award that established the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s LLAKES Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Award RES-594-28-0001 LLAKES (Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies) has supported the writing of this chapter.

References

  1. Baethge, M. (1989). Individualisation as hope and as disaster. In K. Hurrelmann & U. Engels (Eds.), The social world of adolescents: International perspectives, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1998). Democracy without enemies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Behrens, M., & Evans, K. (2002). Taking control of their lives? A comparison of the experiences of unemployed young adults (18–25) in England and the new Germany. Comparative Education, 38, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2006). Work, change and workers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloomer, M. (1999, September 19). Learning careers: Exposing the complexities of learning, young lives and transformations. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, L.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Côté, J. (2002). The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualisation thesis examined. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doray, P., Bélanger, P., Biron, E., Cloutier, S., & Meyer, O. (2010). Biographical transitions and adult learning. In D. W. Livingstone (Ed.), Lifelong learning in paid and unpaid work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, R., & Boreham, N. (2003). The centre cannot hold. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(4), 407–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elder, G. H. (1995). Life trajectories in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, M. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of the Sociology of Education, 103(4), 964–1022.Google Scholar
  17. Engel, U., & Strasser, H. (1998). Global risks and social inequality: Critical remarks on the risk society hypothesis. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 23(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, K. (2002). Taking control of their lives? Journal of Youth Studies, 5(3), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, K. (2006). Achieving equity through gender autonomy: Challenges for VET policy and practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(4), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, K. (2009). Learning, work and social responsibility. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, K., Behrens, M., & Kaluza, J. (2000). Learning and work in the risk society. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, K., Behrens, M., Rudd, P. W., & Woolley, C. (2001). End of award report to ESRC. Taking control: Agency in young adult transitions in England and Germany (Award L 134 251 011). Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council held in ESRC Archives, Essex.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, K., Behrens, M., Rudd, P. W., & Woolley, C. (2004). Young adults talking about the future in education, training and work. Leicester, UK: The National Youth Bureau.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, K., & Furlong, A. (1997). Metaphors of youth transitions: Niches, pathways, trajectories or navigations. In J. Bynner, L. Chisholm, & A. Furlong (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a Western European Context. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, K., & Heinz, W. (Eds.). (1994). Becoming adults in England and Germany. London: Anglo-German Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, K., & Niemeyer, B. (Eds.). (2004). Reconnection: Countering social exclusion through situated learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, K., Schoon, I., & Weale, M. (2010). Life chances, learning and the dynamics of risk throughout the life course (LLAKES Research Paper No. 9). London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  28. Flammer, A. (1997). Developmental analysis of control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self efficacy in changing societies (pp. 40–54). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  29. Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change? Individualisation and risk in late modernity. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1998). Rational action theory for sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green, A. (2002). Education, globalisation and the role of comparative research. London Review of Education, 1(2), 84–97. Available at http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/5487/
  34. Habermas, J. (1996). Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  35. Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102(2), 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heinz, W. R. (1999). From education to work: Cross-national perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Heinz, W. R., Huinink, J., Swader, C. S., & Weymann, A. (2009). General introduction. In W. R. Heinz, J. Huinink, & A. Weymann (Eds.), The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time (pp. 15–31). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, G. (2009). Youth. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lawton, K., & Potter, D. (2010). Why interns need a fair wage. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  40. Noon, M., & Blyton, P. (2002). The realities of work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  41. Ragin, C. C. (1991). The problem of balancing discourse on cases and variables in comparative social science. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 32(1–2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, K. (1994). Flexibility and individualisation: A comparison of transitions into employment. Sociology, 28, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, K. (2003). Change and continuity in youth transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for Western sociology. The Sociological Review, 51(4), 484–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schoon, I. (2008). A transgenerational model of status attainment: The potential mediating role of school motivation and education. National Institute Economic Review, 205, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schoon, I., Ross, A., & Martin, P. (2009). Sequences, patterns and variations in the assumption of work and family related roles: Evidence from two British birth cohorts. In I. Schoon & K. R. Silbereisen (Eds.), Transitions from school to work: Globalisation, individualisation, and patterns of diversity (pp. 219–242). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schoon, I., & Silbereisen, K. R. (Eds.). (2009). Transitions from school to work: Globalisation, individualisation and patterns of diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Settersten, R. A., & Gannon, L. (2009). Structure, agency, and the space between: On the challenges and contradictions of a blended view of the life course. In W. R. Heinz, J. Huinink, & A. Weymann (Eds.), The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  50. Silbereisen, R., & Tomasik, M. (2010). Mapping demands of social change: Research paper 21 ESRC LLAKES research centre, London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  51. Wallace, C. (1994). Gender and transition. In K. Evans & W. Heinz (Eds.), Becoming adults in England and Germany (pp. 43–72). London: Anglo-German Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Woolley, C. (2005). Shaping lives: Agency in young adult transitions. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.Google Scholar
  53. Worth, S. (2005). Beating the ‘churning’ trap in the youth labour market. Work, Employment & Society, 19(2), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wyn, J., & Dwyer, P. (1999). New directions in research on youth transitions. Journal of Youth Studies, 2, 5–21.Google Scholar
  55. Ziehe, T. (1996). Zeitvergleiche Jugend in kulturellen Modernisierungen. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa Vlg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Lifelong and Comparative Education, Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations