Advertisement

Scientific Models in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Research and in the Biology Curriculum

  • Alice Siu Ling Wong
  • Maurice M. W. Cheng
  • Valerie W. Y. Yip
Chapter
Part of the Models and Modeling in Science Education book series (MMSE, volume 7)

Abstract

An in-depth case study of the authentic scientific research during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) crisis revealed a rich list of features of nature of science (NOS). Among these features, model building stands as a prominent activity of scientists for understanding, explaining, and making sense of some of puzzling observations. In this chapter, we present a detailed analysis of four key episodes of the scientific inquiries during the SARS epidemic, namely, (1) the identification of the transmission mode, (2) the hunt for the causative agent of SARS, (3) the search for the natural host of the SARS-related coronavirus, and (4) the explanation of the mysterious infection pattern in the tragic outbreak at Amoy Gardens (a residential complex), to highlight the important roles and characteristics of models, modeling, and multiple levels of representations of science. We also describe how these scientific models developed were intricately related to social, cultural, and political environments. We then review the roles and nature of scientific models emphasized in the most recent biology curriculum implemented in Hong Kong and critique on its inadequacies in fully reflecting the important function of models and modeling in the authentic scientific inquiries.

Keywords

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Scientific Model Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Patient Biology Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, T. (2004). Twenty-first century plague: The story of SARS. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, P. (2003). Galileo’s finger: The ten great ideas of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, R., Blari, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CDC-HKEAA. (2007). Physics/chemistry/biology/integrated science curriculum guide and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. (2003). Update: Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Worldwide, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(12), 241–248.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, M. M. W., Wong, S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2007, April). Students’ understanding of scientific models in different contexts: The impact of teaching on the nature of models. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) annual meeting. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Ministers of Education. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes. Toronto, ON, Canada: CMEC Secretariat.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Health, Government of Hong Kong Special Administration Region. (2003). Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) at Amoy Gardens, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong: Main findings of the investigation. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://www.info.gov.hk/info/ap/pdf/amoy_e.pdf
  11. Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9–27). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit/reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwan, J. (2011). Interactive relationships among teachers’ intentions, beliefs, pedagogical content knowledge and classroom instruction on the nature of science. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  15. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, W., Shi, Z., Yu, M., Ren, W., Smith, C., Epstein, J. H., et al. (2005). Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science, 310(Science), 676–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College.Google Scholar
  18. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E., & Bodner, G. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90(3), 468–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tao, P. K. (2002). A study of students’ focal awareness when studying science stories designed for fostering understanding of the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 32, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Dijk, E. M. (2011). Portraying real science in science communication. Science Education, 95(6), 1086–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wong, S. L., Hodson, D., Kwan, J., & Yung, B. H. W. (2008). Turning crisis into opportunity: Enhancing student teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry through a case study of the scientific research in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1417–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong, S. L., Kwan, J., Hodson, D., & Yung, B. H. W. (2009). Turning crisis into opportunity: Nature of science and scientific inquiry as illustrated in the scientific research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Science Education, 18, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., & Cheng, M. W. (2010). A blow to a decade of effort on promoting teaching of nature of science. In Y.J. Lee (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in science education research in Asia (pp. 259–276). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  25. Wong, S. L., Wan, Z., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2011). Learning nature of science through socio-scientific issues. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 245–269). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Siu Ling Wong
    • 1
  • Maurice M. W. Cheng
    • 1
  • Valerie W. Y. Yip
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations