Skip to main content

A Qualitative Method to Determine How Textbooks Portray Scientific Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks

Abstract

One key aspect of scientific literacy is to have a clear understanding of how scientists work. Understanding how scientists work, or scientific methodology, is an essential part of scientific literacy and the public understanding of science in general. Research indicates that a large majority of Americans do not understand how scientists work. Some argue that science textbooks are one source of this misunderstanding. Although it is impossible to attribute the public’s inaccurate views of scientific methodology to only textbooks, textbooks still serve as a resource for the standard science classroom. Several studies have looked at how science textbooks represent the nature of science and, more specifically, scientific methodology. However, the majority of this research has utilized quantitative methods for their analyses. In other words, much of this research tends to focus on whether, not how, textbooks present scientific methodology. To address this gap in the literature, this study developed a qualitative method to evaluate how textbooks present scientific methodology. In this chapter, I describe the methods used to develop an instrument to look at the quality of a textbook’s presentation of scientific methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshamrani, S., & McComas, W. F. (2009, April). The context, accuracy and frequency of inclusion of key nature of science concepts in current secondary level physics textbooks. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. (1994). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. (2012). Beyond understanding: Process skills as a context for nature of science instruction. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies (pp. 225–246). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, A., Hagins, W. C., Holliday, W. G., Kapicka, C. L., Lundgren, L., MacKenzie, A. H., et al. (2007). Glencoe biology. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, I. C. (2009). Representation of scientific methodology in secondary science textbooks. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession Order No. AAT 3400943).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, I. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010, March). How secondary science textbooks present scientific methodology. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, A., Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 84–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2004). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1847–1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991a). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991b). Procedures for conducting content analysis of science textbooks. Houston, TX: University of Houston, Dept. of Curriculum and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Ganesh, T. G., Lee, Y. H., & Phillips, M. C. (2006, April). Examination of science textbook analysis research conducted on textbooks published over the past 100 years in the United States. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, T., Summers, G., & Barrow, L. (2007). The treatment of geological time and the history of life on earth in high school biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 401–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSalle, R., & Heithaus, M. R. (2008). Holt biology. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2010). Conceptual incoherence as a result of the use of multiple historical models in school textbooks. Research in Science Education, 40, 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, A., & Lawson, A. E. (1992). The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the work of biologists and by biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 54, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J., Almudi, J. M., & Furio, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks. Science Education, 14, 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93, 422–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kfishe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., & Beck, J. (1996). A profile of high school biology textbooks using scientific literacy recommendations. The American Biology Teacher, 58, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (1998). The principle elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, K., Meaney, K., & Agostino, D. (2006). Print publishing for the school market 2007–2008. Stamford, CT: Simba Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82, 527–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2000). A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science, 28, 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2001a). How important are the laws of definite and multiple proportions in chemistry and teaching chemistry? – A history and philosophy of science perspective. Science Education, 10, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2001b). A rational reconstruction of the origin of the covalent bond and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., & Metz, D. (2010). Reconstruction of the history of the photoelectric effect and its implications for general physics textbooks. Science Education, 94, 903–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks (Briefs in education). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. C., & Chiappetta, E. L. (2007, April). Do middle school science textbooks present a balanced view of the nature of science? A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S., & Phillipson, T. (2002, January). A scientific method based upon research scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the annual national conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2002). How in spite of rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooks. Science Education, 11, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). The oil drop experiment: An illustration of scientific research methodology and its implications for physics textbooks. Instructional Science, 32, 357–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiece, K. R., & Colosi, J. (2000). Redefining the “scientific method”. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2012). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1. online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes. Research in Science Education, 29, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching k-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzewitz, P. W., Elliott, T. G., Haase, D. G., Harper, K. A., Herzog, M. R., Nelson, J. B., et al. (2009). Physics: Principles and problems. Columbus, OH: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Binns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binns, I.C. (2013). A Qualitative Method to Determine How Textbooks Portray Scientific Methodology. In: Khine, M. (eds) Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics