Skip to main content

Different Policies, Distinct Processes: Three Case Studies of International Influence in Education Policy Formation in El Salvador

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization, International Education Policy and Local Policy Formation

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyze and compare three cases of education policy formation in El Salvador, a country affected by civil war from 1980 to 1992. The three cases presented here relate, first, to the “Education with Community Participation” (EDUCO) program, second, to the policy for gender equality in education, and, third, to the policy to include the teaching of values in Salvadoran education. These policies began to develop in the early 1990s and would all be incorporated during the 1990s into policy of the Ministry of Education through the Ten Year Plan and, later, the National Women’s Policy. In the three cases, we address contextual aspects as well as the influence of international conferences, international trends, and a range of actors from the local, national, and international levels. In so doing, we explain how and why certain policy formation processes reflect “imposition,” “negotiation,” or “hybridization.” From our findings, we also: suggest factors that determine the dynamics of education policymaking, reflect on the ways in which policy formation can be more symbolic than meaningful, and, finally, emphasize that globalization is diminishing the predominance of traditional state channels with regard to the formulation of education policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To put these contributions in perspective, the total budget for education in 1992 was approximately $109 million (MINED 1994).

  2. 2.

    In this chapter, we use the term policy to refer to government policy specifically (and, more narrowly, that of the MINED), as opposed to state policy generally (Krasner 1984).

  3. 3.

    See Edwards (2013a, 2014) for further discussion of these perspectives and for extensive citations of the key authors who have written about each of them, including, for example, Gita Steiner-Khamsi, Jurgen Schriewer, David Phillips, Joel Samoff and Thomas Popkewitz, among others.

  4. 4.

    This section is based on Edwards (2013b).

  5. 5.

    It is of note that Cecelia Gallardo, before becoming minister of education, was an education specialist at FEPADE.

  6. 6.

    It should also be noted that the MINED’s relationship with teachers’ unions was also dysfunctional, as these unions tended to support the cause of the FMLN.

  7. 7.

    Popular education is an approach to education where students, in being taught to read, are also taught to critically interpret their contexts to identify structures and policies that contribute to marginalization (see, e.g., Freire (1970) and Kane (2001)).

  8. 8.

    Interview with INTACT12, October 19, 2011.

  9. 9.

    While the EDUCO program was initially only intended as a strategy to provide education at the preschool level and in grades 1–3, it was subsequently expanded in 1994 to cover through grade 6 and then again in 1997 to cover through grade 9 (Meza et al. 2004). After 2005, even some high schools became EDUCO schools (Gillies et al. 2010).

  10. 10.

    This finding is not meant to negate the vision and ability of MINED officials, for both interviewees and available literature have affirmed these attributes with regard to Cecelia Gallardo and others (Gillies 2010).

  11. 11.

    The one exception was the 1980 conference in Copenhagen, in which El Salvador presumably did not participate because a special resolution was presented citing serious human rights abuses in El Salvador, against women and children.

  12. 12.

    For a detailed explanation on the evolution of approaches to issues of women, development and society, see García Prince (2008).

References

  • Basso, M. (1985). Nosotras podemos: Guía para las alfabetizadoras. UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, R. (1997). The dynamics of educational reform in El Salvador, 1989–1996. In Benjamín Álvarez H & Monic Ruiz-Caseres (Eds.) Paths of change: Education reform under way in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 47–70). Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J., Wade, C., & Walker, T. (2006). Understanding Central America. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (2003). Community initiatives in education: Goals, dimensions and linkages with governments. Compare, 33(1), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar-Marchelli, H. (2003). Decentralization and privatization of education in El Salvador: Assessing the experience. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2012a). Researching international processes of education policy formation: Conceptual and methodological consideration. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(2), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2012b). The approach of the World Bank to participation in development and education governance: Trajectories, frameworks, results. In C. Collins & A. Wiseman (Eds.), Education strategy in the developing world: Revising the World Bank’s education policy (pp. 249–273). Bingley: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2013a). International processes of education policy formation: An analytic framework and the case of plan 2021 in El Salvador. Comparative Education Review, 57(1), 22–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B, Jr. (2013b). The development of global education policy: A case study of the origins and evolution of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. Unpublished dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2014). ¿Cómo analizar la influencia de los actores e ideas internacionales en la formación de políticas educativas nacionales? Una propuesta de un marco de análisis y su aplicación a un caso de El Salvador. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22(12). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n12.2014

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., & Klees, S. (2012). Participation in international development and education governance. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and programmes (pp. 55–77). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J., Kreimer, A., & Margaret, A. (2000). El Salvador: Post-conflict reconstruction: Country case evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, A., & Carrasco, A. (2000). La educación y su reforma: El Salvador, 1989–1998. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. (1996). Laying the groundwork: The struggle for civil society in El Salvador. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 38(1), 67–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Prince, E. (2008). Políticas de igualdad, equidad y gendermainstreaming. ¿De qué estamos hablando? Marco Conceptual. San Salvador: PNUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, J. (Ed.). (2010). Education system reform and aid effectiveness: The power of persistence. USAID and Equip 2. http://www.equip123.net/docs/E2-Power_of_Persistence.pdf

  • Gillies, J., Crouch, L., & Flórez, A. (2010). Strategic review of the EDUCO program. El Salvador: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, E. (2005a). Reintegrating excombatants into society in El Salvador. In E. Vargas-Barón & H. Bernal (Eds.), From bullets to blackboards: Education for peace in Latin America and Asia (pp. 159–174). New York: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, J. (2005b). Educational reform in post-war El Salvador. In E. Vargas-Barón & H. Alarcón (Eds.), From bullets to blackboards: Education for peace in Latin America and Asia (pp. 43–62). New York: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. L. (1998). Fighting to learn. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Salvadoreño para el Desarrollo de la Mujer (ISDEMU). (1997). Política Nacional de la Mujer. San Salvador: ISDEMU, Gobierno de El Salvador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (1990). UNESCO and the politics of global literacy. Comparative Education Review, 34(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, L. (2001). Popular education and social change in Latin America. London: Latin American Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacayo, F. (1995). Cultura de paz: Una ‘utopía’, viable, urgente y necesaria. El Salvador: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeoGrande, W. M. (2000). Our own backyard: The United States and Central America, 1977–1992. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N., & Warwick, D. (2006). La planeación educativa: ¿Ciencia o política? Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 36(1/2), 153–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza, D., Guzmán, J., & de Varela, L. (2004). EDUCO: A community-managed education program in rural areas of El Salvador. Paper presented at Scaling up poverty reduction: A global learning process and conference, Shanghai, May 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINED. (1990). Servicios educativos a niños pobres Salvadoreños de 0 a 14 años. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINED. (1994). Memoria institucional: Periodo junio de 1989-junio de 1994. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINED. (1995a). Foro consultivo nacional sobre reforma educativa. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINED. (1995b). Lineamientos generales del Plan Decenal, 1995–2005. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINED. (1999). En el camino de la transformación educativo de El Salvador. San Salvador: MINED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, A., & Samuels, D. (Eds.). (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M. E. (1997). La política nacional de la mujer (Alternativas para el desarrollo, No. 50). San Salvador: FUNDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. (2000). Calidad de la educación enfocada en los géneros. Hacia una pedagogía global. In J. Navarro, K. Taylor, A. Bernasconi, & L. Tyler (Eds.), Perspectivas sobre las políticas educativas en las Américas (pp. 147–167). Cambridge: HIID-USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quán, A. (2005). Through the looking glass: U.S. Aid to El Salvador and the politics of national identity. American Ethnologist, 32(2), 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F., & McGinn, N. (1997). Conducting a participatory sector assessment in El Salvador. In F. Reimers & N. McGinn (Eds.), Informed dialogue: Using research to shape education policy around the world. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollis, P. (1993). Poverty alleviation in El Salvador: An appraisal of the Cristiani government’s social programme. Journal of International Development, 5(5), 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. (1997). Increasing girls’ and women’s participation in basic education. Fundamentals of educational planning. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tünnermann, C. (2003). La universidad Latinoamericana ante los retos del siglo XXI. Mexico.: UDUAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (1991). Grant agreement: Education for democracy program. San Salvador: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (1992). Grant agreement: Democratic and electoral processes project. San Salvador: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (1993). Grant agreement: Democratic initiatives project. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, D. (1989). Decentralization in education: An economic perspective (Population and Human Resources Department Paper). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Brent Edwards Jr. Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edwards, D.B., Martin, P., Victoria, J.A. (2015). Different Policies, Distinct Processes: Three Case Studies of International Influence in Education Policy Formation in El Salvador. In: Brown, C. (eds) Globalization, International Education Policy and Local Policy Formation. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4165-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics