Advertisement

The Socially Constructed Natural Origins of Self-Organization

  • Diane M. Rodgers
Chapter
Part of the Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology book series (COLE, volume 23)

Abstract

From traffic flows to architecture, inspiration for understanding the design patterns of nature has been discovered in the behavior and structures of ant, bees, wasps, and termites. These patterns are viewed as emerging from self-organization, with each member of the group having little information yet contributing to the overall ability to create distinct, complex design from simple collective behavior. The concept of “swarm intelligence” further identifies this behavior of social insects as one that may also apply to human systems, revolutionizing our systems to match the more flexible, decentralized models of social insects. A paradigm shift in viewing social systems has occurred based on the understanding of these exemplars of natural self-organized systems.

Keywords

Social Construction Social Insect Swarm Intelligence Knowledge Claim Complex Adaptive System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

6. References

  1. Abend G (2006) Styles of sociological thought: sociologies, epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. quests for truth. Sociol Theory 24(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RN (1982) The emergence of hierarchical social structure: the case of late Victorian England. In: Schieve WC, Allen PM (eds) Self organization and dissipative structures. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 116–131Google Scholar
  3. Allen PM (1997) Cities and regions as self-organizing systems: models of complexity. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashby WR (1947) Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. J Gen Psychol 37:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes B, Shapin S (eds) (1979) Natural order: historical studies of scientific culture. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Beebe W (1921) Edge of the jungle. Henry Holt and Company, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belt T (1911) The Naturalist in nicaragua. J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blum MS, Portocarrro CA (1964) Chemical releasers of social behavior-IV. The hindgut as the source of the odor trail pheromone in the Neotropical Army Ant Genus Eciton. Ann Ent Soc Am 57(6):793–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J, Franks NR, Rafelsberger O, Joly J, Blanco S (1998) A model for the emergence of pillars, walls and royal chambers in termite nests. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke P (1997) Fable of the bees: a case-study in views of nature and society. In: Teich M, Porter R, Gustafsson B (eds) Nature and society in historical context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–123Google Scholar
  11. Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Banabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa JT, Fitzgerald TD (2005) Social terminology revisited: where are we ten years later? Ann Zool Fennici 42:559–564Google Scholar
  13. Couzin ID, Franks NR (2003) Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Franks N, Pasteels JM (1989) The blind leading the blind: modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J Insect Behav 2:719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3(2):159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dorigo M, Gambardella LM (1997) Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dornhaus A, Franks NR (2008) Individual and collective cognition in ants and other insects (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:215–226Google Scholar
  18. Ellen R (1993) The cultural relations of classification: an analysis of Nuaulu Animal Categories from Central Seram. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Escobar A (1999) After nature. Curr Anthropol 40(1):1MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franks NR, Partridge LW (1993) Lanchester battles and the evolution of combat in ants. Anim Behav 45:197–199Google Scholar
  21. Franks NR, Deneubourg J (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behavior and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54:779–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franks NR, Gomez N, Goss S, Deneubourg JL (1991) The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 4(5):583–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert GN, Mulkay M (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: a sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon DM (1989) Caste and change in social insects. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 56–72Google Scholar
  25. Gordon DM (2010) Ant encounters: interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gotwald WM (1995) Army ants: the biology of social predation. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham L, Kantor J (2006) A comparison of two cultural approaches to mathematics: France and Russia, 1890–1930. Isis 97:56–74MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Grassé P-P (1959) La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuells chez Bellicositermes Natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: essai d’interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs. Insect Sociaux 6:41–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene JC (1981) Science, ideology, and world view: essays in the history of evolutionary ideas. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  30. Gurung AB (2003) Insects – a mistake in God’s creation? Tharu farmers’ perception and knowledge of insects: a case study of Gobardiha village development committee, Dang-Deukhuri, Nepal. Agric Hum Values 20:337–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamilton W (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–16, and 17–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Femin Studies 14(3):575–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harvey D (1996) Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Harwood J (1987) National styles in science: genetics in Germany and the United States between the World Wars. Isis 78(3):390–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herbers J (2006) The loaded language of science. Chron High Educ 52(29):B5, 1pc, 1cGoogle Scholar
  36. Hess DJ (1995) Science and technology in a multicultural world: the cultural politics of facts and artifacts. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofstadter R (1955) Social Darwinism in American thought. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Holland O, McFarland D (2001) Artificial ethology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Karsai I, Pénzes Z (1998) Nest shapes in paper wasps: Can the variability of forms be deduced from the same construction algorithm? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1261–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order: self organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Kauffman S (1996) At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Kelly K (1994) Out of control: the rise in neo-biological civilization. Addison-Wesley Publishing, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  43. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 4:1942–1948Google Scholar
  44. Kennedy J, Eberhart R, Shi Y (2001) Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  45. Knorr-Cetina KD (1981) The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Kropotkin P (1902) Mutual aid. McClure, Phillips and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Latour B, Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  49. Lerner RM (2001) Concepts and theories of human development, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Levine D (1995) The organism metaphor in sociology. Social Res 62(2):239–265Google Scholar
  51. Lewotin R (1991) Biology as ideology: the doctrine of DNA. HarperPerennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Lovejoy A (1936) The great chain of being: a study of the history of an idea. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Maeterlinck M (1901) The life of the bee. Dodd, Mead and Company, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Manicas PT (1987) A history of philosophy of the social sciences. Basil Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Marias E [1937](1973) The soul of the white ant. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. McCook HC (1909) Ant communities and how they are governed: a study in natural civics. Harper and Brothers Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Merrick J (1988) Royal bees: the gender politics of the beehive in early modern Europe. Studies Eighteenth-Century Cult 18:7–37Google Scholar
  58. Mitchell S (2002) Integrative pluralism. Biol Philos 17:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitman G (1992) The state of nature: ecology, community, and American social thought, 1900–1950. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  60. Novellino D (2000) The relevance of myths and worldviews in Palawan classification, perceptions, and management of honey bees. In: Stepp JR, Wyndham FS, Zarger RK (eds) with assistance from Cohen M, Lee S. Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity: proceedings of the seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology. University of Georgia Press, pp 189–206Google Scholar
  61. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  62. Posey DA (2002) In: Plenderleith K (ed) Kayapó ethnoecology and culture. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Ransome HM (1937) The sacred bee in ancient times and folklore. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  64. Réaumur RA (1926) [1743–1744] The natural history of ants, translated and annotated by William Morton Wheeler. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Redfield R (ed) (1942) Levels of integration in biological and social systems: biological symposia, vol 8. The Jacques Cattell Press, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  66. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comput Graph 21(4):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robinson DM (1986) Discussion on the self-organization of the British Empire. In: Fox SW (ed) Self-organization. Adenine Press, Guilderland, pp 189–191Google Scholar
  68. Rodgers DM (2008) Debugging the link between social theory and social insects. Louisiana State University Press, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  69. Sapp J (1994) Evolution by association: a history of symbiosis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  70. Schneirla TC (1934) Raiding and other outstanding phenomena in the behavior of army ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20(5):316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schneirla TC (1943) The nature of ant learning. II. The intermediate stage of segmental maze adjustment. J Comp Psychol 35(2):149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneirla TC (1944) The reproductive functions of the army-ant queen as pacemakers of the group behavior pattern. J NY Entomol Soc 52:153–192Google Scholar
  73. Schneirla TC (1945) The army-ant behavior pattern: nomad-statary relations in the swarmers and the problem of migration. Biol Bull 88(2):166–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sherman PW, Lacey EA, Reeve HK, Keller L (1995) The eusociality continuum. Behav Ecol 6(1):102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sleigh C (2002) Brave new worlds: trophallaxis and the origin of society in the early twentieth century. J Hist Behav Sci 38(2):133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sleigh C (2007) Six legs better: a cultural history of myrmecology. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  77. Solé RV, Bonabeau E, Degado J, Fernández P, Marín (2000) Pattern formation and optimization in army ant raids. Artificial Life 6(3):219–226Google Scholar
  78. Torgerson RL, Akre RD (1970) Interspecific responses to trail and alarm pheromones by new world army ants. J Kansas Entomol Soc 43(4):395–404Google Scholar
  79. Wcislo WT (1997) Are behavioral classifications blinders to studying natural variation? In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wheeler WM (1911) The ant colony as organism. J Morphol 22(2):307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilson EO (1965) Chemical communication in the social insects. Science 149(3688):1064–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Worster D (1985) Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Wright W (1992) Wild knowledge: science, language and social life in a fragile environment. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  84. Young RM (1985) Darwin’s metaphor: nature’s place in Victorian culture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations