Abstract
The limitations of the maximum likelihood method for estimating spatial covariance parameters are: the assumption that the experimental data follow a multi-dimensional Gaussian distribution, biased estimates, impracticality for large data sets and the common assumption of a polynomial drift. The advantages are easy evaluation of parameter uncertainty, no information loss in binning and the ability to include additional information using a Bayesian framework. We provide extensions to overcome the disadvantages whilst maintaining the advantages. We provide an algorithm for obtaining covariance estimates for non-Gaussian data using Gaussian maximum likelihood. We provide a means of generating unbiased estimates of spatial covariance parameters without increasing the estimation variance. We overcome the impracticality for larger data sets by an approximation to the complete maximum likelihood. Finally, we extend the polynomial drift to other forms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bard Y (1974) Nonlinear parameter estimation. Academic Press, New York
Firth D (1993) Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 30(1):27–38
Kitanidis PK, Lane RW (1985) Maximum likelihood parameter estimation of hydrologic spatial processes by the Gauss-Newton. J Hydrol 79(1–2):53–71
Kitanidis PK (1987) Parametric estimation of covariances of regionalized variables. Water Resour Bull 23(4):671–680
Mardia KV, Marshall RJ (1984) Maximum likelihood estimation of models for residual covariance in spatial statistics. Biometrika 71(1):135–146
Pardo-Igúzquiza E, Dowd PA (1997) AMLE3D: a computer program for the statistical inference of covariance parameters by approximate MLE. Comput Geosci 23(7):793–805
Quenouille MH (1956) Notes on bias estimation. Biometrika 43:353–360
Ripley BD (1981) Spatial statistics. Wiley, New York
Russo D, Jury WA (1987) A theoretical study of the estimation of the correlation scale in spatially variable fields: 1. Stationary fields. Water Resour Res 23(7):1257–1268
Stein ML (1999) Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging. Springer, New York
Thorpe WR, Rose CW, Simpson RW (1979) Areal interpolation of rainfall with a double Fourier series. J Hydrol 42(1–2):171–177
Vecchia AV (1988) Estimation and model identification for continuous spatial processes. J R Stat Soc B 50(2):297–312
Wahba G (1990) Spline models for observational data. SIAM, Philadelphia
Warnes JJ, Ripley BD (1987) Problems with the likelihood estimation of covariance functions of spatial Gaussian processes. Biometrika 74(3):640–642
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by research project CGL2010-15498 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Spain. The authors acknowledge the funding provided by Australian Research Council Grant DP110104766.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowd, P.A., Pardo-Igúzquiza, E. (2012). Extensions of the Parametric Inference of Spatial Covariances by Maximum Likelihood. In: Abrahamsen, P., Hauge, R., Kolbjørnsen, O. (eds) Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4152-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4153-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)