Feasibility Prototyping

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering book series (BRIEFSELECTRIC)

Abstract

A powerful method to investigate new architectural concepts is to create feasibility prototypes. These are known by a wide variety of names in industry: concept car, development mule, alpha demo tool, etc. Depending on their implementation, these allow various aspects of a new design to be investigated and evaluated as if the function or property already exists in the product. This chapter discusses the structure, advantages and challenges of three prototypes of a transmission electron microscope: (1) the feasibility prototype, which includes an approach to step-wise develop advanced system functionality in a project context, (2) the proxy device, an add-on system that minimally interferes with a current electron microscope while allowing many significant experiments on image-based global control, and (3) the microscope simulator, which allows investigation of local and global control strategies

Keywords

Feasibility prototyping Electron microscope Experimentation platform Data acquisition system Scanning module Proxy pattern System simulation Control architecture System dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    A. Tejada, A.J. Den Dekker, W. Van Den Broek, Introducing measure-by-wire, the systematic use of systems and control theory in transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 111, 1581–1591 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Tejada, W. Van Den Broek, S. Van Der Hoeven, A.J. Den Dekker, Towards STEM control: modelling framework and development of a sensor for defocus control, in Proceedings of 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2009) pp. 8310–8315Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Tejada, A.J. Den Dekker, The role of Poisson’s binomial distribution in the analysis of TEM images. Ultramicroscopy 111, 1553–1556 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.F. Franklin, D.J. Powell, M.L. Workman, Digital Control of Dynamical Systems, 3rd edn. (Addisson Wesley, Menlo Park, 1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathworks, Using the matlab function block (2011), http://www.mathworks.nl/help/toolbox/simulink/ug/f6-6010.html
  6. 6.
    C.G. Cassandras, S. Lafortune, Introduction to Discrete Event Systems, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Tejada, Measure by wire (2011), http://www.tejadaruiz.net/MBW/html
  8. 8.
    A. Tejada, Stability analysis of Markov jump linear systems with Markov inputs, Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Virginia, (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.J. Tocci, N. Widmer, G. Moss, Digital Systems: Principles and Applications, 11th edn. (Prentice Hall, NJ, 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Tejada, J.R. Chávez-Fuentes, P. Vos, Stability and performance analysis of dual-rate systems with random output rate via markov jump linear system theory, in Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, pp. 2895–2900Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research FellowEmbedded Systems InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Senior Research FellowEmbedded Systems InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations