Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 2)

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the contemporary debate on the concepts and definitions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Sustainability (CS). The conclusions, based on historical perspectives, philosophical analyses, impact of changing contexts and situations and practical considerations, show that “one solution fits all” definition for CS(R) should be abandoned, accepting various and more specific definitions matching the development, awareness and ambition levels of organizations.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Supply Chain Civil Society Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Ambition Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

CS

Corporate sustainability

CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility

ECSF

European Corporate Sustainability Framework

SRI

Socially Responsible Investing

VNO-NCW

Dutch Employers Association

WBCSD

World Business Council for Sustainable Development

Notes

Acknowledgements

While writing the basic draft of this article in the beautiful valley of the Ardech, France, I made particular use of an overview article on CSR by Math. Göbbels [see  Chaps. 2,  5] and the work of Ken Wilber [see  Chap. 3].

Furthermore, I wish to acknowledge the constructive and useful comments of earlier versions of this article by Teun Hardjono, Marco Werre and my wife, Erna Kraak.

References

  1. Andriof, J., and M. McIntosh, (eds.) 2001. Perspectives on corporate citizenship. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, S.B. 2001. Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Issue 1: 39–55.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, D., and C. Cowan. 1996. Spiral dynamics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, T. 1995. Accountability: It all depends on what you mean. Clifton: Akkad Press.Google Scholar
  5. Committee for Economic Development. 1971. Social responsibilities of business corporations. 16 New York: CED.Google Scholar
  6. Drucker, P. 1984. The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 16(2): 53–63.Google Scholar
  7. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Foley, J.A., S. Levis, M.H. Costa, et al. 2000. Incorporating dynamic vegetation cover within global climate models. Ecological Applications 10: 1620–1632.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. 1970. The order of things. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Göbbels, M. 2002. Reframing corporate social responsibility: The contemporary conception of a fuzzy notion. Google Scholar
  13. Hawken, P. 1993. The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  14. Henderson, D. 2001. Misguided virtue. False notions of corporate social responsibility. Wellington: New Zealand Business RoundTable.Google Scholar
  15. Keijzers, G., R. van Daal, and F. Boons. 2002. Duurzaam Ondernemen, strategie van bedrijven. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  16. Kilcullen, M., and J. Ohles Kooistra. 1999. At least do no harm: Sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Reference Services Review 27(2): 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klatt, B., S. Murphy, and D. Irvine. 1999. Accountability: Practical tools for focusing on clarity, commitment and results. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  18. Korten, D. 2001. When corporations rule the world, 2nd ed. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Levinas, E. 1961. Totality and infinity. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Linnanen, L., and V. Panapanaan. 2002. Roadmapping CSR in Finnish companies. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Marsden, C., and J. Androf. 1998. Towards an understanding of corporate citizenship and how to influence it. Citizenship Studies 2(2): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maslow, A. 1968/1982. Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  23. Marrewijk, M., and T.W. Hardjono. 2001. The social dimensions of business excellence. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8(3): 223.Google Scholar
  24. Marrewijk, M., and M. Werre. May 2003. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2 and 3): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuire, J.W. 1963. Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Pirsig, R. 1991. Lila, an inquiry into morals. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  27. Quazi, A.M., and D. O’Brien. 2000. An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 25(1): 33–51.Google Scholar
  28. Steiner, G.A., and F.S. Steiner. 2000. Business, government and society. A managerial perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. van Marrewijk, M. 2003. European corporate sustainability framework. International Journal of Business Performance Measurement 5(2/3): 121–132.Google Scholar
  30. van Marrewijk, M., and T.W. Hardjono. May 2003. European corporate sustainability framework for managing complexity and corporate change. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3): 121–132.Google Scholar
  31. Votaw, D., and S.P. Sethi. 1973. The corporate dilemma: Traditional values versus contemporary problems. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Wartick, S.L., and D.J. Wood. 1998. International business and society. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development or the Brundtland Commission 1987.Google Scholar
  34. Wempe, J., and M. Kaptein. 2002. The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wilber, K. 1995. Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  36. Wilber, K. 2000. A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  37. World Business Council for Sustainable Development WBCSD. 2000. Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. Geneva: WBCSD.Google Scholar
  38. Zadek, S. 2001. The civil corporation. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Zwart, A. van der. 2002. Reputatiemechanisme in beweging: doelstreffend bij issues aan MVO? Master thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VlaardingenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations