“Alternative” Shoreline Erosion Control Devices: A Review

  • Orrin H. PilkeyEmail author
  • J. Andrew G. Cooper
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 3)


A variety of patented approaches have been devised in efforts to halt shoreline erosion. Commonly termed ‘alternative’ or ‘innovative’ technologies, these are typically variations on the traditional approaches. A categorization of these approaches is presented that identifies devices placed in the water and devices placed on the beach. These categories are further subdivided. Despite their innovative nature and the claims of their inventors and promoters, these devices suffer from a variety of weaknesses when deployed in the real world. We present a non-exhaustive list of 110 devices for which US patents were awarded since 1970.

The view of success of ‘alternative’ devices often differs between reports made by the developer and those of the end-user and only in a few cases have objective assessments been made. Using a variety of sources we review experiences with artificial surfing reefs and beach drainage systems. We conclude that ‘alternative’ devices offer the same range of shortcomings as traditional shoreline stabilization approaches because of the inherent inability to control such a dynamic sedimentary environment and the failure to address the underlying causes of shoreline recession (sea level rise, sediment supply, other engineering structures, and the presence of infrastructure in the active coastal zone).


Coastal Manager Beach Nourishment Shoreline Erosion Shoreline Retreat Submerge Breakwater 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bancroft S (1999) Performance monitoring of the Cable Station artificial surfing reef. BSc Hons Dissertation, University of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Black KP (1998) Narrowneck reef, report 3: sediment transport modelling. Report to the Gold Coast City Council, Mar 1998Google Scholar
  3. Black KP (2001) Artificial surfing reefs for erosion control and amenity: theory and application. J Coast Res Spec Issue 34:1–14Google Scholar
  4. Bowman D, Ferri S, Pranzini E (2007) Efficacy of beach dewatering-Alassio, Italy. Coast Eng 54:791–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruun P (2005) Beach drain. In: Schwartz ML (ed) Encyclopaedia of coastal science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 138–140Google Scholar
  6. Chappel J, Eliot IG, Bradshaw MP, Lonsdale E (1979) Experimental control of beach face dynamics by watertable pumping. Eng Geol 14:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciavola P, Fontana E, Vicinanza D (2009) Performance of a beach drainage system at Lido Adriano (Ravenna-Italy). 33rd IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis WR, Davis JE (1998) Field evaluation/demonstration of a multisegmented dewatering system for accreting beach sand in a high-wave-energy environment. US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Report CPAR-CHL-98-1Google Scholar
  9. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2008) Strategic beach management plan
  10. Gerstel WJ, Brown JF (2006) Alternative shoreline stabilization evaluation project. Puget Sound Action Team, Olympia, 43 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Goler G (2004) Numerical modelling of groundwater flow behaviour in response to beach dewatering. Masters thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  12. Hutt JA, Mead ST (1998) Narrowneck reef, report 2: surfing aspects. Report to the Gold Coast City Council, Mar 1998Google Scholar
  13. Hutt JA, Black KP, Jackson A, MaGrath J (1998) Narrowneck reef, report 1: Field studies. Report to the Gold Coast City Council, Jan 1998Google Scholar
  14. Jackson LA, Corbett BB (2007) Review of existing multi-functional artificial reefs. In: Australasian Conference on Coasts and Ports, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  15. Jackson LA, Tomlinson R, Turner I, Corbett B, D’Agata M, McGrath J (2005) Narrowneck artificial reef. Results of 4 years of monitoring and modifications. In: Proceedings of the 4th international surfing reef symposium, Manhattan Beach, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson LA, Corbett BB, McGrath J, Tomlinson R, Stuart G (2007) Narrowneck reef: review of seven years of monitoring. Shore Beach 75:1–13Google Scholar
  17. Machemehl JL, French TJ, Huang NE (1975) New method for beach erosion control. Engineering in the oceans, ASCE speciality conference, pp 142–160Google Scholar
  18. Mead S, Black KP (1999) A multipurpose, artificial reef at Mount Maunganui Beach, New Zealand. Coast Manag 27:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mead S, Blenkinsopp C, Moores A, Borrero J (2010) Design and construction of the Boscombe multi-purpose reef.
  20. Steinvorth R (2010) Improving surfing conditions with floating wave filters. Masters thesis, Universitat Poitecnica Catalunya.
  21. Turner IL, Leatherman SP (1997) Beach dewatering as a “soft” engineering solution to coastal erosion – a history and critical review. J Coast Res 13:1050–1063Google Scholar
  22. Turner I, Leyden V, Symonds G, McGrath J, Jackson A, Jancar T, Aarninkof S, Elshoff I (2000) Comparison of observed and predicted coastline changes at the Gold Coast Artificial (surfing) reef. ICCE. In: Edge BE (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on coastal engineering, Sydney.
  23. Vesterby H (1991) Coastal drain system: a new approach to coastal restoration. In: Proceedings of GEO-Coast ’91, Yokohama, Japan, pp 651–654Google Scholar
  24. Vesterby H (1994) Beach face dewatering – the European experience. Alternative technologies in beach preservation. In: Proceedings of the 7th national conference on beach preservation technology, Tampa, FL, pp 53–68Google Scholar
  25. Vicinanza D, Guida A, Ferrante V, Ciavola P (2010) Performance of a beach dewatering system – Chiaiolella Beach, Procida Island, Italy. J Coast Res 26:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vongvisessomjai S (1992) Coastal erosion on the Gulf of Thailand. Eng Inst Thail 3:38–58Google Scholar
  27. Woodruff PE (2006) Historical overview of innovative erosion control technology in Florida. Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of UlsterColeraineUK

Personalised recommendations