Advertisement

Convergence or Divide in the Movement for Sustainable and Just Agriculture

  • Miguel A. AltieriEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Agriculture Reviews book series (SARV, volume 9)

Abstract

‘Greening’ the green revolution will not be sufficient to reduce hunger and poverty and conserve biodiversity. The increasing cost of oil and fertilizers, and the deterioration of the climate and global ecology are key factors that undermine the capacity of humankind to feed itself. This phenomena became evident when the ‘perfect storm’ occurred in 2008 with the alarming rise in the cost of food that sent an additional 75 million people to the world’s line of hungry people. Disregarding the above issues the ruling international agricultural class continues asserting that food production will have to be increased by 70% by the year 2050. The threat to global food insecurity is the direct result of the industrial model of agriculture ­characterized by large-scale monocultures tailored for the export markets. We need an alternative agricultural development paradigm, one that encourages more ­ecologically, biodiverse, sustainable and socially just forms of agriculture.

Strategies are needed which lead to the revitalization of small and medium sized farms, and point the way towards the reshaping of the entire agricultural policy and food system in ways that are economically viable to farmers and consumers. Proposed ‘sustainable intensification’ is ideologically buttressed by intellectual projects to reframe and redefine agroecology by stripping it of its political and social content and promote the wrong notion that agroecological methods can co-exist alongside the aggressive expansion of transgenic crops and agrofuels. Many environmental and advocacy groups privilege those with access to capital and perpetuate an ‘agriculture of the poor for the rich’. The technological determinism that the organic agriculture movement emphasizes via development and dissemination of low-input or appropriate technologies is not only naïve but dangerous, as it assumes these technologies in themselves have the capability of initiating beneficial social changes.

A more radical transformation of agriculture is needed, one guided by the notion that ecological change in agriculture cannot be promoted without comparable changes in the social, political, cultural and economic arenas that determine agriculture. In the end the new crisis is just a new face of the old rural crisis derived from the almost total control of the food system by transnational capital aided by neoliberal programs implemented by many governments. It is imperative to realize that out-of-control trade liberalization is the key mechanism driving farmers off their land and the principal obstacle to local economic development and food sovereignty. It is also crucial to understand that a key enemy of farmers is low prices. Moving towards a more socially just, economically viable, and environmentally sound agriculture will be the result of the coordinated action of social movements in the rural sector in alliance with civil society organizations that are committed to supporting the goals of farmer’s movements.

Keywords

Food Security Food System Fair Trade Transgenic Crop Food Sovereignty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Altieri MA (2004) Agroecology versus ecoagriculture: balancing food production and biodiversity conservation in the midst of social inequity. CEESP occasional papers, Issue 3, 29 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Altieri MA, Toledo VM (2011) The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. J Peasant Stud 38:587–812. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Schutter O (2010) Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. UN General Assembly. Human Rights Council sixteenth session, Agenda item 3 A/HRC/16/49Google Scholar
  4. Foley JA (2011) Can we feed the world, sustain the planet? Sci Am 305:60–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holt-Gimenez E, Patel R (2009) Food rebellions: the real story of the world food crisis and what we can do about it. Fahumu Books and Grassroots International, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) (2009) Agriculture at a crossroads. In: International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development Global Report. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaufman F (2010) The food bubble: how Wall Street starved millions and got away with it. Harper’s Magazine, July:27–34Google Scholar
  8. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Wright A (2009) Nature’s matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. Earthscan, London, 272pGoogle Scholar
  9. Roland PC, Adamchak RW (2009) Tomorrow’s table: organic farming, genetics and the future of food. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosset PM (2009) Food sovereignty in Latin America: confronting the new crisis. NACLA report on the Americas, May–June:16–21Google Scholar
  11. Rosset PM (2011) Preventing hunger: change economic policy. Nature 479:472–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosset PM, Altieri MA (1997) Agroecology versus input substitution: a fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Soc Nat Resour 10:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomich T, Brodt S, Ferris F, Galt R, Horwath W, Kebreab E, Leveau J et al (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(15):1–30Google Scholar
  14. Van der Ploeg JD (2009) The new peasantries: new struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Earthscan, London, 356 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & ManagementUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations