Abstract
The contextualization of sociocultural theory to practice illustrates how the role of history in learning may be used to broaden Vygotsky’s argument about how cultural contexts that involve a recursive process for intellectual construction or transformation of knowledge are vital for learning and development. Accordingly, the idea is to bring together major assumptions about Vygotskian theory and mathematical learning discussed in the previous chapters, focusing primarily on tools and signs, intersubjectivity, and the zone of proximal development.
Keywords
- Mathematics Teacher
- Prospective Teacher
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Previous Chapter
- Proximal Development
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Albert, L. R. (2000). Outside-in-inside-out: Seventh-grade students’ mathematical thought processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 109–141.
Albert, L. R., Bilics, A., Lerch, C., & Weaver, B. (1999, April). The web of intersubjectivity: A Vygotskian framework for adult learning. Symposium at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
Albert, L. R., Bilics, A., Lerch, C., & Weaver, B. (2000, April). Applying the web of intersubjectivity: A Vygotskian framework for adult learning. Symposium at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Albert, L., & Jones, D. (1997). Implementing the science teaching standards through complex instruction: A case study of two teacher-researchers. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 383–391.
Bassette, H. J. (2008). Using students’ drawings to elicit general and special educators’ perceptions of co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1376–1396.
Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 6, 80–91.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Conle, C., Louden, W., & Mildon, D. A. (1998). Tensions and intentions in group inquiry: A joint self-study. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran, & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 178–194). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Davydov, V. V. (1995). The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education theory, research, and practice. Educational Researcher, 24, 12–21.
Dickmeyer, N. (1989). Metaphor, model, and theory in education research. Teachers College Record, 91, 151–160.
Efron, S., & Joseph, P. B. (1994). Reflections in a mirror-teacher-generated metaphors from self and others. In P. B. Joseph & G. E. Burnaford (Eds.), Images of schoolteachers in the twentieth-century America-paragons, polarities, complexities. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335–346.
Katz, P., McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., Riedinger, K., Marbach-Ad, G., Dai, A., et al. (2011). Professional identity development of teacher candidates participating in an informal science education internship: A focus on drawings as evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1169–1197.
Mackeracher, D. (1996). Making sense of adult learning. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Culture Concepts Inc.
Plaskoff, J. (2003). Intersubjectivity and community building: Learning to learn organizationally. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 161–184). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Rommetveit, R. (1979). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In R. Rommetveit & R. B. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication. London: Academic.
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of cultural development of the child. In R. Van Der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 57–72). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1996). Drawing ourselves into teaching: Studying the images that shape and distort teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 303–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albert, L.R. (2012). Closing Thoughts and Implications. In: Rhetorical Ways of Thinking. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4065-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4065-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4064-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4065-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)