Generational Differences: Something Old, Something New

Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas arise when individuals have to make decisions in the context of competing values and beliefs. Some of these dilemmas will occur on the dimensions of what an individual believes to be fundamentally right or wrong, while others will be more nuanced depending on, for example, the relative strength and salience to the individual of the competing values and beliefs involved, the perceived costs to the individual of acting on or expressing their ethical concerns, and the degree of acceptance in the organization of conflict legitimacy and the expression of dissenting views. The workforce is getting older and, by all accounts, the work ethic and expectations across the generations are quite different. Such perceived differences provide a potentially fertile ground for ethical differences and conflicts arising from these.

Keywords

Ethical Dilemma Generational Difference Baby Boomer Young Worker Career Opportunity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Academy of Management. (2005). Code of ethics. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?ID=268&page_ID=240
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
  3. Boxall, P., Macky, K., & Rasmussen, E. (2003). Labour turnover and retention in New Zealand: The causes and consequences of leaving and staying with employers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 195–214. doi: 1038-4111(200308)41:2;195-214;034915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. (2000). Trust and the design of work: Complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relations, 53(12), 1575–1591. doi: 10.1177/00187267005312003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Amato, A., & Herzfeldt, R. (2008). Learning orientation, organizational commitment and talent retention across generations: A study of European managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 929–953. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Hauw, S., & De Vos, A. (2010). Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: Does the recession lead to lowered expectations? Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 293–302. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9162-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de los Reyes, P. (2000). Diversity at work: Paradoxes, possibilities and problems in the Swedish discourse on diversity. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21(6), 253–266. doi: 10.1177/0143831X00212007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deal, J. (2007). The myth of generational differences in the workplace. In: J. Deal (Ed.), Review of the book Retiring the generation gap. How employees young and old can find common ground. San Francisco: Wiley. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from www.amanet.org/training/articles
  10. Deal, J., Altman, D., & Rogelberg, S. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 191–199. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9177-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dollard, M., & Karasek, R. (2010). Building psychosocial safety climate: Evaluation of a socially coordinated PAR risk management stress prevention study. In J. Houdmont & S. Leka (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice (pp. 208–233). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907–928. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2011). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organisational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(2), 98–103. doi: 10.1108/00197850710732424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gopinath, C., & Becker, T. E. (2000). Communication, procedural justice, and employee attitudes: Relationships under conditions of divestiture. Journal of Management, 26(1), 63–83. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600107.Google Scholar
  17. Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211–223. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. Jurkiewicz, C. E. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 55–74.Google Scholar
  20. Kirby, E. L., & Harter, L. M. (2001). Discourses of diversity and the quality of work life: The character and costs of the managerial metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 121–127. doi: 10.1177/0893318901151008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kowske, B., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 265–279. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9171-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multi-generation employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  24. Lane, N., & Piercy, N. F. (2003). The ethics of discrimination: Organizational mindsets and female employment disadvantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(6), 313–325. doi: 10.1023/A:1023644602447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levenson, A. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An economist’s perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 257–264. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9170-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 537–567. doi: 10.1080/09585190601178745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2008). Employee experiences of high-performance work systems: An analysis of sectoral, occupational, organisational and employee variables. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 33(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  28. Myers, K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225–238. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ng, E., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 979–987. doi:10.1016S0148-2963(02), 00268-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Guinn, T., & Shrum, L. (1997). The role of television in the construction of social reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 278–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Real, K., Mitnick, A., & Maloney, W. (2010). More similar than different: Millennials in the U.S. building trades. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 303–313. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9163-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shapiro, G. (2000). Employee involvement: Opening the diversity Pandora’s Box? Personnel Review, 29(3), 304–323. doi: 10.1108/00483480010324661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, J., & Gardner, D. H. (2007). Factors affecting employee use of work-life balance initiatives. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  35. Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382. doi: 10.1002/job.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Staff, J., & Schulenberg, J. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: Experiences in paid work during adolescence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 247–255. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9167-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company.Google Scholar
  38. Tesser, A., & Shaffer, D. R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 479–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Reevaluating the evidence for increasingly positive self-views among high school students: More evidence for consistency across generations (1976–2006). Psychological Science, 20(7), 920–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02361.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75. doi: 10.1177/1745691609356789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2008). Is “Generation Me” really more narcissistic than previous generations? Journal of Personality, 76(4), 903–918. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00508.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Twenge, J. W. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1007–1021. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Twenge, J. W. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 201–210. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Twenge, J. W., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862–877. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Twenge, J. W., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Birth cohort differences in the monitoring the future dataset and elsewhere: Further evidence for Generation Me – Commentary on Trzesniewski and Donnellan (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 81–88. doi: 10.1177/1745691609357015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weekend Herald. (2007). Don’t hire Gen Y says researcher, Weekend Herald, pp C8.Google Scholar
  47. Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resources practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515–535. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700502.Google Scholar
  48. Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7(10), 335–342. doi: 10.1037/h0066338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyMassey UniversityAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and LawAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations