Telecommuting and Flexible Work Hours: Alternative Work Arrangements that Can Improve the Quality of Work Life

Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine work  →  nonwork conflict, its causes, and its consequences. We also address in detail two alternative work arrangements (i.e., telecommuting and flextime) that can reduce the incidence of work  →  nonwork conflict. Our coverage of telecommuting and flextime makes apparent that these arrangements are not quick fixes. Rather, there are several contingency factors (e.g., supervisor support) that need to be considered by an employer given they influence the likely success of these nontraditional work arrangements. If implemented effectively (e.g., participation is voluntary, employees have a voice in program design), telecommuting and flextime can help an employee balance the sometimes competing demands of their work and nonwork lives. Facilitating such a balance not only has tangible benefits for employers (e.g., lower turnover), it is the ethical thing for employers to do.

Keywords

Work Schedule Contingency Factor Supervisor Support Flexible Work Flexible Schedule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anonymous. (2010). Flexible hours in the ranks. HR Magazine. SHRM 2010 HR Trend Book, 16–17.Google Scholar
  2. Aratani, L. (2008, August 23). Flextime has green appeal and lures younger workers. Washington Post, p. A1Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. T. (2006). Making the leap. HR Magazine, 51(May), 80–86.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K. (2008). Work-family conflict: The importance of family friendly employment practices and family supportive supervisors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chubb Corporation. (2005, July 18). Chubb workplace flexibility initiative boosts employee productivity. www.chubb.com/corporate/chubb3897.html
  10. Dalton, D. R., & Mesch, D. (1990). The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1998–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Families and Work Institute. (2009). Guide to bold new ideas for making work work. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frase-Blunt, M. (2007). Call centers come home. HR Magazine, 52(January), 84–89.Google Scholar
  16. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gannett. (2005, July 18). Gannett announces results of a pilot program for the BOLD initiative. www.gannett.com/news/pressrelease/2005/pr071805.htm
  18. Golden, L. (2009). Flexible daily work schedules in U.S. jobs: Formal introductions needed? Industrial Relations, 48, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golden, T. D. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact of those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for coworkers’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2006). Health consequences of work-family conflict: The dark side of the work-family interface. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 6, pp. 171–211). Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.Google Scholar
  22. Grzywacz, J. G., & Butler, A. B. (2008). Work-family conflict. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 451–468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., & Andrey, J. (2008). ‘I’m home for the kids’: Contradictory implications for work-life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 454–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Martinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jossi, F. (2007). Clocking out. HR Magazine, 52, 47–50.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, E. L., Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., et al. (2008). Getting there from here: Research on the effects of work-family initiatives on work-family conflict and business outcomes. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 305–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kossek, E. E., Lewis, S., & Hammer, L. B. (2010). Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from margin to mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis, S. (2003). Flexible working arrangements: Implementation, outcomes, and management. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Roberson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 1–28). Chichester, UK/Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Lu, J., Liu, O., Spector, P. E., & Shi, K. (2009). Antecedents and outcomes of a fourfold taxonomy of work-family balance in Chinese employed parents. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Major, D. A., Virive, J. M., & Joice, W. (2008). Telework as a dependent care solution: Examining current practice to improve telework management strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nord, W. R., Fox, S., Phoenix, A., & Viano, K. (2002). Real-world reactions to work-life balance programs: Lessons for effective implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pearce, J. A. (2008). Successful corporate telecommuting with technology considerations for late adopters. Organizational Dynamics, 38, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Podlas, K. (2001). Reasonable accommodation or special privilege? Flex-time, telecommuting, and the ADA. Business Horizons, 44, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pomeroy, A. (2007). The future is now. HR Magazine, 52, 46–51.Google Scholar
  39. Rogier, S. A., & Padgett, M. Y. (2004). The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, A. M., & Kossek, E. E. (2008). Work-life policy implementation: Breaking down or creating barriers to inclusion. Human Resource Management, 47, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Society for Human Resource Management. (2009, July). Workplace flexibility in the 21st century. Alexandria, Virginia.Google Scholar
  42. Tahmincioglu, E. (2003, July 20). By telecommuting, the disabled get a key to the office, and a job. New York Times, p. 1 (L).Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, B. L., Delcampo, R. G., & Blancero, D. M. (2009). Work-family conflict/facilitation and the role of workplace supports for U.S. Hispanic professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson, L. F., & Aspinwall, K. R. (2009). The recruitment value of work/life benefits. Personnel Review, 38, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United States General Accounting Office. (July, 2001). Potential barriers employers may face when establishing telecommuting programs.Google Scholar
  46. Welch, J. L., & Gordon, D. (1980). Assessing the impact of flextime on productivity. Business Horizons, 23, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wells, S. J. (2001). Making telecommuting work. HR Magazine, 46(October), 34–46.Google Scholar
  48. Wells, S. J. (2007). Are you too family friendly. HR Magazine, 52(October), 34–39.Google Scholar
  49. WorldatWork. (2009, February). WorldatWork 2009 telework trendlines.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Missouri – St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Missouri – St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations