Advertisement

Pest Thresholds: Their Development and Use in Vineyards for Arthropod Management

  • Rufus Isaacs
  • Michael C. Saunders
  • Noubar J. Bostanian
Chapter

Abstract

Thresholds provide a quantitative basis upon which crop managers can decide whether arthropod pest populations are below, at, or exceeding a level that warrants the expense of activities to reduce the pests density. These interventions may be cultural, biological, or chemical control practices that reduce the pest population below the economic threshold. Thresholds are an essential component of an IPM program, and their use can lead to significant reduction in pesticides applied to crops and lower costs of production for farmers (Pedigo et al. 1986).

Keywords

Action Threshold Pest Population Economic Threshold Arthropod Pest Grape Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank William Hutchison (University of Minnesota) and Craig Roubos (Michigan State University) for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this chapter. The lead author also acknowledges the financial support of the Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council, National Grape Cooperative, and the USDA Viticulture East Program.

References

  1. Arias GA, Nieto JC (1983) Estimación de las pérdidas producidas por la “araña amarilla común” (Tetranychus urticae Koch) en “Tierra de Barros” (Badajoz) y propuesta de un umbral de tolerancia económica. Bol Serv Def Plagas Insp Fitopat 9:227–252Google Scholar
  2. Bardner RK, Fletcher E (1974) Insect infestations and their effects on the growth and yield of field crops: a review. Bull Entomol Res 64:142–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley WJ (2009) The integrated control concept and its relevance to current integrated pest management in California fresh market grapes. Pest Manag Sci 65:1298–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley WJ, Varela LG, Zalom FG, Smith RJ, Purcell AH, Phillips PA et al (2008) Grape webspinning spider mites. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r302400111.html
  5. Bostanian NJ, Mailloux G (1990) Threshold levels and sequential sampling plans for tarnished plant bug in strawberries. In: Bostanian NJ, Wilson LT, Dennehy TJ (eds) Monitoring and integrated management of arthropod pests of small fruit crops. Intercept Ltd., Andover, pp 81–101Google Scholar
  6. Buntin GD (2001) Techniques for evaluating yield loss from insects. In: Peterson RKD, Higley LG (eds) Biotic stress and yield loss. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 23–41Google Scholar
  7. Candolfi MP, Boller EF, Wermelinger B (1992) Influence of the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, on the gas exchange of Pinot noir grapevine leaves. Vitis 31:205–212Google Scholar
  8. Candolfi MP, Jermini M, Carrera E, Candolfi-Vasconcelos MC (1993a) Grapevine leaf gas exchange, plant growth, yield, fruit quality and carbohydrate reserves influenced by the grape leafhopper, Empoasca vitis. Entomol Exp Appl 69:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Candolfi MP, Wermelinger B, Boller EF (1993b) Influence of the red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) on yield, fruit quality and plant vigour of three Vitis vinifera varieties. Vitic Enol Sci 48:161–164Google Scholar
  10. Candolfi MP, Wermelinger B, Boller EF (1993c) Photosynthesis and transpiration of “Riesling x Sylvaner” grapevine leaves as affected by the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) (Acari, Tetranychidae) feeding. J Appl Entomol 115:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Candolfi-Vasconcelos MC, Koblet W (1991) Influences of partial defoliation on gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll content of field-grown grapevines: mechanisms and limitations of the compensation capacity. Vitis 30:129–141Google Scholar
  12. Costello MJ, Daane KM (1997) A comparison of sampling methods used to estimate spider (Araneae) species abundance and composition in grape vineyards. Environ Entomol 26:142–149Google Scholar
  13. Dennehy TJ, Hoffman CJ, Nyrop JP, Saunders MC (1990) Development of low-spray, biological and pheromone approaches for control of grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana Clemens, in the eastern United States. In: Bostanian NJ, Wilson L, Dennehy TJ (eds) Monitoring and integrated management of arthropod pests of small fruit crops. Intercept Ltd., Andover, pp 261–282Google Scholar
  14. Dozier HL, Williams LL, Butler HG (1932) Life history of the grape-berry moth in Delaware. Univ Del Agric Exp Stn Bull, 176:1–47Google Scholar
  15. Flaherty, DL, Christensen LP, Lanini WT, Marois JJ, Phillips PA, Wilson LT (1992) Grape pest management, 2nd edn. Publication 3343. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  16. Flore JA, Lakso AN (1989) Environmental and physiological regulation of photosynthesis in fruit crops. Hortic Rev 11:111–157Google Scholar
  17. Galvan TL, Burkness EC, Hutchison WD (2006) Efficacy of selected insecticides for management of the multicolored Asian ladybeetle on wine grapes near harvest. Plant Health Prog. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2006-1003-01-RS
  18. Galvan TL, Burkness EC, Vickers Z, Stenburg P, Mansfield AK, Hutchison WD (2007a) Sensory-based threshold for multicolored Asian lady beetle-related taint in winegrapes. Am J Enol Vitic 58:518–522Google Scholar
  19. Galvan TL, Burkness EC, Hutchison WD (2007b) Enumerative and binomial sequential sampling plans for multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in wine grapes. J Econ Entomol 100:1000–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girolami V (1987) Mites of vineyards and control strategies. In: Balkema AA (ed) Integrated pest control in viticulture. Commission of the European Communities, Rotterdam, pp 185–194Google Scholar
  21. Gossard HA, Houser JS (1906) The grapeberry worm. Ohio Agric Exp Stn Circ 63:1–16Google Scholar
  22. Hammons DL, Kurtural SK, Potter DA (2010a) Impact of insecticide-manipulated defoliation by Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) on grapevines from vineyard establishment through production. Pest Manag Sci 66:565–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammons DL, Kurtural SK, Potter DA (2010b) Japanese beetle defoliation reduced primary bud cold hardiness during vineyard establishment. Am J Enol Vitic 61:130–134Google Scholar
  24. Hanna R, Zalom FG, Roltsch WJ (2003) Relative impact of spider predation and cover crop on population dynamics of Erythroneura variabilis in a raisin grape vineyard. Entomol Exp Appl 107:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartzell FZ (1910) A preliminary report on grape insects. N Y Agric Exp Stn Bull 331:489–581Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman CJ, Dennehy TJ, Nyrop JP (1992) Phenology, monitoring, and control decision components of the grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) risk assessment program in New York. J Econ Entomol 85:2218–2227Google Scholar
  27. Howell GS (2001) Sustainable grape productivity and the growth-yield relationship: a review. Am J Enol Vitic 52:165–174Google Scholar
  28. Howell GS, Candolfi-Vasconcelos MC, Koblet W (1994) Response of Pinot noir grapevine growth, yield, and fruit composition to defoliation the previous growing season. Am J Enol Vitic 45:188–191Google Scholar
  29. Hutchison WD, Galvan TL, Burkness EC, Koch RL (2010) Harmonia axyridis as an economic pest of wine grapes in the U.S.: progress in developing an IPM program and potential impact in Europe. IOBC/WPRS Bull 58:47–52Google Scholar
  30. Jubb G, Obourn T, Petersen D (1978) Pilot pest management program for grapes in Erie County, Pennsylvania. J Econ Entomol 71:913–916Google Scholar
  31. Kast WK (1989) Untersuchungen zur Befall-Verlust-Relation und Bekämpfungsschwelle bei der Obstbaumspinnmilbe (Panonychus ulmi Koch) an Reben. Dtsch Weinbau Jahr 40:199–209Google Scholar
  32. Kenis M, Roy HE, Zindel R, Majerus MEN (2008) Current and potential management strategies against Harmonia axyridis. BioControl 53:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koch RL (2003) The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: a review of its biology, uses in biological control, and non-target impacts. J Insect Sci 3:32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Koch RL, Burkness EC, Wold Burkness SJ, Hutchison WD (2004) Phytophagous preferences of the multicolored Asian ladybeetle (Coleoptea: Coccinellidae) for autumn-ripening fruit. J Econ Entomol 97:539–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lenz MS, Isaacs R, Howell GS, Flore J (2009) Vegetative growth responses of Pinot gris (Vitis vinifera L.) grapevines to infestation by potato leafhoppers (Empoasca fabae Harris). Am J Enol Vitic 60:130–137Google Scholar
  36. Lucas E, Labrie G, Vincent C, Kovach J (2007) The multicoloured Asian ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis – beneficial or nuisance organism? In: Vincent C, Goettel M, Lazarovits G (eds) Biological control: a global perspective. Case histories from around the world. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mailloux G, Bostanian NJ (1988) Economic injury level model for tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae) in strawberry fields. Environ Entomol 17:581–586Google Scholar
  38. Mansfield TK, Howell GS (1981) Response of soluble solids accumulation, fruitfulness, cold resistance, and onset of bud growth to differential defoliation stress at véraison in Concord grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 32:200–205Google Scholar
  39. Martinson TE, Hoffman CJ, Dennehy TJ, Kamas JS, Weigle T (1991) Risk assessment of grape berry moth and guidelines for management of the eastern grape leafhopper. N Y Food Life Sci Bull 138:1–10Google Scholar
  40. Martinson TE, Dunst R, Lakso A, English-Loeb G (1997) Impact of feeding injury by eastern grape leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on yield and juice quality of Concord grapes. Am J Enol Vitic 48:291–302Google Scholar
  41. May P, Shaulis NJ, Antcliff AJ (1969) The effect of controlled defoliation in the Sultana vine. Am J Enol Vitic 20:237–250Google Scholar
  42. Mercader RJ, Isaacs R (2004) Phenophase-dependent growth responses to foliar injury in Vitis labruscana Bailey var. Niagara during vineyard establishment. Am J Enol Vitic 55:1–6Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell PD, Hutchison WD (2009) Economic risk and decision making in IPM. In: Radcliffe EB, Hutchison WD, Cancelado RE (eds) IPM: concepts, tactics, strategies, and case studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35–50Google Scholar
  44. Moschos T (2006) Yield loss quantification and economic injury level estimation for the carpophagous generations of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana Den. et Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Int J Pest Manag 52:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) Biology of the grapevine. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Pedigo LP, Hammond RB, Poston FL (1977) Effects of green cloverworm larval intensity on consumption of soybean leaf tissue. J Econ Entomol 70:159–162Google Scholar
  47. Pedigo LP, Hutchins SH, Higley LG (1986) Economic injury levels theory and practice. Annu Rev Entomol 31:341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pettit RH (1933) The principal grape insects of Michigan. Mich State Coll Agric Exp Stn Bull 239:1–7Google Scholar
  49. Pickering GJ, Lin JY, Riesen R, Reynolds A, Brindle I, Soleas G (2004) Influence of Harmonia axyridis on the sensory properties of white and red wine. Am J Enol Vitic 55:153–159Google Scholar
  50. Pickering G, Lin J, Reynolds A, Soleas G, Riesen R, Berindle I (2005) The influence of Harmonia axyridis on wine composition and aging. J Food Sci 70:5128–5135Google Scholar
  51. Pickering G, Lin J, Reynolds A, Soleas G, Riesen R (2006) The evaluation of remedial treatments for wine affected by Harmonia axyridis. Int J Food Sci Technol 41:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poston FL, Pedigo LP, Welch SM (1983) Economic injury levels: reality and practicality. Bull Entomol Soc Am 29:49–53Google Scholar
  53. Ross C, Ferguson H, Keller M, Walsh D, Weller K, Spayd S (2007) Determination of ortho-nasal aroma threshold for multicoloured Asian ladybeetle in a Concord grape juice. J Food Qual 30:855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saunders MC, Tobin PC (2000) Grape cane gallmaker (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its impact on cultivated grapes. J Econ Entomol 93:795–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seinhorst JW (1965) The relationship between nematode density and damage to plants. Nematologica 11:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shepard PH, Rook G (1952) Grape spray schedule and description of grape pests. Miss State Fruit Exp Stn Circ 33:1–9Google Scholar
  57. Smart R, Robinson M (1991) Sunlight into wine; a handbook for wine grape canopy management. Australian Industrial Publishers Pty Ltd., UnderdaleGoogle Scholar
  58. Southwood TRE, Norton GA (1973) Economic aspects of pest management strategies and ­decisions. Meml Ecol Soc Aust 1:168–184Google Scholar
  59. Stern VM (1973) Economic thresholds. Annu Rev Entomol 18:259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stern VM, Smith RF, van den Bosch R, Hagen KS (1959) The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29:81–101Google Scholar
  61. Taschenberg EF (1948) Evaluation of spray programs for the control of the grape berry moth, Polychrosis viteana Clemens. N Y State Agric Exp Stn Geneva Tech Bull 283:3–70Google Scholar
  62. Venette RC, Moon RD, Hutchison WD (2002) Strategies and statistics of sampling for rare ­individuals. Annu Rev Entomol 47:143–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rufus Isaacs
    • 1
  • Michael C. Saunders
    • 2
  • Noubar J. Bostanian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Horticulture Research and Development CenterAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSaint-Jean-sur-RichelieuCanada

Personalised recommendations