Engaging Children in Learning Ecological Science: Two Botanic Garden Educators’ Pedagogical Practices

Chapter

Abstract

In England, botanic gardens are popular settings for school trips where students can attend botanic garden educators’ lessons. These educators contribute greatly to the visitors’ learning. However, at present, there is little research on these educators’ pedagogical practices, especially with respect to how they engage and support children in learning ecological science. This chapter explores two botanic garden educators’ teaching practices by analyzing their interactions with visiting elementary students. The research findings imply that (1) learning in botanic gardens is experiential and knowledge focused and (2) the botanic garden educators would benefit from professional development to update their pedagogical content knowledge, so as to keep pace with the latest education innovations.

Keywords

Botanic Garden Ecological Science School Trip Daily Life Experience Venus Flytrap 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., & Ginns, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BGEN. (2009). Supporting inspirational learning about plants and their importance. Botanic Garden Education Network (BGEN). http://bgen.org.uk. Accessed 16 July 2009.
  6. Bowker, R. (2002). Evaluating teaching and learning strategies at the Eden Project. Evaluation and Research in Education, 16(3), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowker, R. (2004). Children’s perceptions of plants following their visit to the Eden Project. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22(2), 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, M. (2005). Learning in nature. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson, R. (1998). The sense of wonder. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  10. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DfEE. (1999). Science: Key stages 1–4: The National Curriculum for England. London: Department for Education and Employment (DfEE).Google Scholar
  13. DfEE. (2006). Learning outside the classroom manifesto. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills (DfES) Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glackin, M. (2007). Using urban green space to teach science. School Science Review, 89(327), 1–8.Google Scholar
  16. Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, V. (2000). More than just plants: Engaging with the politics of identity at botanical gardens. Paper presented at the Making sense of teaching and learning through environmental education research, Chelsea Physic Garden, London.Google Scholar
  19. Kohn, D. (2008). Darwin the botanist. Roots, 5(2), 5–8.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: Learning outside the classroom. London: Farming and Countryside Education (FACE) and Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF).Google Scholar
  22. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. O’Donnell, L., Morris, M., & Wilson, R. (2006). Education outside the classroom: An assessment of activity and practice in schools and local authorities. London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES).Google Scholar
  24. Ofsted. (2008). Learning outside the classroom: How far should we go? (No. NR-2008-30). London: Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).Google Scholar
  25. QCDA. (2008). Science and the national curriculum aims. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://curriculum.qcda.gov.uk
  26. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research & King’s College London.Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, D. (2004). Botanic gardens: ‘Walled, stranded arks’ or environments for learning? Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton.Google Scholar
  28. Sanders, D. (2007). Making public the private life of plants: The contribution of informal learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1209–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Slingsby, D. R. (2006). The future of school science lies outdoors. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 51–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. South, M. (1999). Can a botanic garden education visit increase children’s environmental awareness? Paper presented at the 4th International Congress on Education in Botanic Gardens, Kerala, India.Google Scholar
  32. Stewart, K. M. (2003). Learning in a botanic garden: The excursion experiences of school students and their teachers. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Talking about plants: Comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wellington, J., & Ireson, G. (2008). Science learning, science teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Westgate, D., & Hughes, M. (1997). Identifying ‘quality’ in classroom talk: An enduring research task. Language and Education, 11(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Sciences and Science Education, National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations