Skip to main content

Creative and Co-operative Science and Technology Education Course: Theory and Practice in Finnish Teacher Education Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1792 Accesses

Abstract

Numerous models for curriculum changes, as well as new pedagogical strategies, are available nowadays, both in the literature and in school textbooks. However, in spite of some good efforts, behaviourist methodologies still appear to be dominant in education today. This chapter describes a special science and technology education course that promoted co-operative and creative problem solving in primary school teacher education. The purpose of the course was to study creativity through analysing a special method for problem solving and to create new pedagogical approaches which promote active, co-operative and problem-centred learning in science and technology education. In addition, we attempted to evaluate a process that included several phases, from recognizing a problem to testing and evaluating it, and where a small group of student teachers together solved a problem in a science and technology education context. On the basis of our results, we suggest that creative problem solving which includes decision making in several phases forces students to engage in tasks that develop, among others, high-order thinking skills, social skills and problem-solving skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context (pp. 88–89). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J. (2005). The Hegemonic behaviorist cycle. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, C. (1997). Problem-centred learning experiences: Exploring past, present and future perspectives. Roeper Review, 19(4), 192–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences series, No. 69. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, R. S. (1996). Rich environments for active learning. In R. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. A project of the association for educational communications and technology (AECT) (pp. 665–691). London: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. M. (1994). Creative problem solving techniques: The handbook of new ideas for business. Winter Park: New Management Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R. (1999). Teaching technology: Implementing a problem-centered, activity-based approach. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsey, R. (1995). The design process: Does it exist? A critical review of published models for the design process in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. (2003). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J. M., & Meisalo, V. P. (2001). Luovan ongelmanratkaisun työtavat [Models of teaching in creative problem solving]. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.malux.edu.helsinki.fi/kirjasto/lor/

  • Murdock, M. (2003). The effects of teaching programmes intended to stimulate creativity: A disciplinary view. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1988). SPSS/PC advanced statistics (V 2.0). Chigago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. M. (1991). Team players and teamwork: The competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellwood, P. A. (1991). The investigative learning process. Journal of Design & Technology Teaching, 24(1), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1998). Idea generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 32(2), 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strzalecki, A. (2000). Creativity and design. General model and its verification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., & Williams, J. (1997). Problem based learning: An appropriate methodology for technology education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ossi Autio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Autio, O., Lavonen, J. (2012). Creative and Co-operative Science and Technology Education Course: Theory and Practice in Finnish Teacher Education Context. In: Tan, K., Kim, M. (eds) Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics