• Peter Kroes
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 6)


The world in which we live is a world of technical artefacts. We live our lives with and through them. It is not so much the natural world as well as the technical world that conditions human life. This technical world not only provides us with the means to adapt the physical environment to our needs and desires. Its influence stretches out much further into the world of social affairs and into the world of ideas. Through the ages, for instance, technology has provided strong metaphors for interpreting what it means to be a human being, such as the man-machine or the brain-computer metaphors. So, the technical world strongly influences human thinking and doing. This book is an attempt to understand what kind of world this technical world is by studying the nature of the basic elements that make up this world, namely technical artefacts. Given their pervasive influence on human thoughts and actions, such an understanding may contribute to, or may even be a requisite step to a better understanding of the modern human condition. To that end, this book addresses a number of questions all of which centre around technical artefacts. What kind of objects are they? What does it mean for an object to be a technical artefact? In what sense are they different from objects from the natural world, or the social world? How do they come into existence? Does it make sense to consider technical artefacts to be morally good or bad because of the way they influence human life?


Physical Structure Physical Object Technical Function Dual Nature Practical Rationality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dipert, Randall R. 1993. Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dipert, Randall R. 2000. Doing and Making: the proper place of actions and artifacts in philosophical theory. In The dual nature of technical artefacts: kick off meeting. Delft, Delft University of Technology (June 2000).Google Scholar
  3. Hilpinen, Risto. 2004. Artifact. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. (editor):
  4. Kroes, Peter, Maarten Franssen, and Louis Bucciarelli. 2009. Rationality in Design. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, ed. Anthonie Meijers, 565-600. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Krohs, Ulrich, and Peter Kroes. 2009. Functions in biological and artificial worlds; comparative philosophical perspectives. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Margolis, Eric, and Stephen Laurence. 2007. Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Pitt, Joseph C. 2000. Thinking about technology; foundations for the philosophy of technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
  8. Romano, Giacomo. 2009. Being for: A philosophical hypothesis about the structure of functional knowledge. In Functions in biological and artificial worlds; comparative philosophical perspectives, eds. Ulrich Krohs, and Peter Kroes, 167-184. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Simons, Peter. 1995. Artefact. In Companion to metaphysics, eds. J. Kim, and E Sosa, 33. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Thomasson, Amie L. 2007. Artifacts and human concepts. In Creations of the mind: essays on artifacts and their representations, eds. Stephen Laurence, and Eric Margolis, 52-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Kroes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations