Institutional Diversification and Homogeneity in Romanian Higher Education: The Larger Picture

  • Liviu Andreescu
  • Radu Gheorghiu
  • Viorel Proteasa
  • Adrian Curaj
Chapter

Abstract

Interest in the twin issues of institutional diversity and homogeneity in Romanian higher education is of quite recent date. As a result, there is currently an understandable paucity of analyses of these phenomena. In this article we aim to expand on the existing studies of institutional homogeneity/diversity by advancing some complementary hypotheses. We supplement the dominant neo-institutionalist arguments on the limited diversity in the Romanian academe with a resource-dependence perspective. We claim that, besides the (expected) isomorphic forces at play, diversification was also delayed by the absence of sufficient pressures for institutional differentiation.

Keywords

High Education High Education System Academic Program Funding System Resource Dependence Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Birzea, C. (1995). Educational reform and educational research in central-eastern Europe: The case of Romania. Paper presented at the IBE International Meeting, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  3. Birzea, C. (1996). Educational reform and power struggles in Romania. European Journal of Education, 31, 97–107.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, P. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. (1994). The organization of academic work (Rev. ed.). New Brunswick/London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  6. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eismon, T., et al. (1995). Higher education reform in Romania. Higher Education, 30, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Georgescu, L. (2010, February 25–March 1). Evoluţia învăţământului superior românesc. Presented at the conference “Forumul Organizaţiilor Studenţești din România”, Bucharest.Google Scholar
  9. Georgescu, L. (2011, March 30–April 1). Evoluţia finanţări sistemului de învăţământ superior din România. Presented at the conference “Perspective în finanţarea învăţământului superior”, Bucharest.Google Scholar
  10. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hnyatek, A. (2011, March 6). Scump, doamna, scump! Gradinita privata costa de sase ori cat facultatea, la Timisoara! Opinia Timişoarei.Google Scholar
  12. Huisman, J. (1995). Differentiation, diversity and dependency in higher education. Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  13. INS. (2010). Starea economică a României, 2008-09. Bucureşti: Institutul naţional de statistic.Google Scholar
  14. MECTS. (2010). Raport asupra stării sistemului naţional de învăţământ, 2010. Retrieved August 23, 2011, from http://www.edu.ro/index.php/articles/15128
  15. Miroiu, A., & Andreescu, L. (2010). Goals and instruments of diversification in higher education. Quality Assurance Review for Higher Education, 2, 89–101.Google Scholar
  16. Miroiu, A., et al. (1998). Invatamantul romanesc azi. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  17. Morphew, C. (2009). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of US colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Păunescu, M. (2006). Organizare şi câmpuri organizaţionale. Iaşi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  19. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  20. Reisz, R. (1994). Curricular patterns before and after the Romanian revolution. European Journal of Education, 29, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singh, V., & Lumsden, C. (1990). Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soros Foundation. (2007). Sistemul universitar românesc: Opiniile cadrelor didactice şi ale studenţilor. Bucharest: Fundaţia Soros Romania.Google Scholar
  23. Teixeira, P., et al. (2011, June). Public-private mix and patterns of program diversification across European Higher Education. Paper presented at the 24th Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
  24. Vlăsceanu, L., Miroiu, A., Păunescu, M., & Hâncean, M.-G. (Eds.). (2011). Barometrul Calităţii 2010. Starea calităţii în învăţământul superior din România. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liviu Andreescu
    • 1
  • Radu Gheorghiu
    • 2
  • Viorel Proteasa
    • 3
  • Adrian Curaj
    • 4
  1. 1.Spiru Haret UniversityBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Institute for World EconomyBucharestRomania
  3. 3.National School for Political Studies and Public AdministrationBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Politehnica UniversityBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations