Advertisement

The Quality of Life Measured Through the Subjective Indicators of Safety: Fear, Worry About Crime and the Risk of Criminality

  • Alessandra Federici
  • Maria Giuseppina Muratore
  • Daria Squillante
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 48)

Abstract

What about the relationship between safety and quality of life? How is it recognisable, how is it perceived and how theorisable and measurable is this relationship? How fear affects individual and social well-being? The Italian Citizens Safety Survey, carried out the last time in 2008 and 2009, allows all these questions to be answered since both subjective and objective aspects of criminality as well as their impact on quality of life are addressed.

The international debate on the role of fear, victimisation and social and environmental decay on well-being and on the several ways to measure fear is very complex and shows the need for a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to the “safety perception” phenomenon. Also, data analysis confirms that a unidirectional link between individual victimisation and fear of criminality does not exist: perception of insecurity is also caused by generic anxiety related to individual and social variables, such as age, gender, economic conditions, cultural resources and social networks.

But how do we operationalise concepts like “safety” or “insecurity” and their “perception”? In this perspective, it is important to jointly analyse subjective and objective dimensions, as the perceived or real fear of becoming a victim, the safety perception in public and private spaces and the worry of crimes (Butler G, Mathews A, Adv Behav Res Ther 25:273–280, 1983; Adv Behav Res Ther II(5), 1987). The performed analyses (correspondence analysis, clustering and logistic) raised an interesting and complex framework: from one side, the highlighted panorama is very objective, where fear and worry of crime are strongly related to the suffered victimisation, the social and environmental decay and the foreseen risk of becoming a victim; from the other side, in the absence of concrete risk situations, fear seems to be related to the weakness of social communication and contacts and to the socio-economic and individual vulnerability.

Considering the complexity of this scenario, which includes both subjective and objective components strongly related to quality of life, the definition of synthetic indicators, aimed at studying the impact of safety on quality of life, is needed even though it is not easy to be performed. Further work is required.

Keywords

Multiple Correspondence Analysis Safe Life Crime Victim Daily Habit Italian Citizen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barbagli, M. (1998). Reati, vittime, sicurezza dei cittadini. Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Social issues of law and order. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z., & Vecchi, B. (2004). Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bolasco, S. (1999). Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Roma: Carocci editore.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive process in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 273–280.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1987). Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy , II(5).Google Scholar
  8. Farrall, S., Bannister, J., Ditton, J., & Gilchrist, E. (2000). Social psychology and fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2006). Combining the new and old measures of the fear of crime: Exploring the “worried-well”. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  10. Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007a). Theorising the fear of crime: The cultural and social significance of insecurities about crime. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007b). Everyday emotion and the fear of crime: preliminary findings from experience and expression. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  12. Gabriel, U., & Greve, W. (2003). The psychology of fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 600–614.Google Scholar
  13. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Trans. it. (1994). Le conseguenze della modernità. Bologna: Il Mulino.)Google Scholar
  15. Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007). Functional fear: Adaptational features of worry about crime. London: School of Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: Review of literature. International Review of Victimology, 4, 79–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LaGrange, R., Ferraro, L., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: The role of social and physical incivilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Piron, M. (1997). Statistique exploratorie multidimensionelle. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, M. (2001). The genesis of fear of crime. Theoretical Criminology, 5(4), 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liska, A. E., Sanchirico, A., & Reed, M. D. (1988). Fear of crime and constrained behavior specifying and estimating reciprocal effects model. Social Forces, 66(3), 827–837.Google Scholar
  23. Magni, S. F. (2003). Capacità, libertà e diritti: Amartya Sen e Martha Nussbaum. Filosofia politica, 3, 497–506.Google Scholar
  24. Muratore, M. G., & Arsani, S. (2004). Le vittime. In R. Selmini (Ed.), La sicurezza urbana. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  25. Muratore, M. G., Tagliacozzo, G., & Federici, A. (2004). La Sicurezza dei Cittadini. Reati, vittime, percezione della sicurezza e sistemi di protezione. Istat, collana informazioni, n. 25.Google Scholar
  26. Roché, S. (1988). Insécurité, sentiment d’insécurité et recomposition du social: deux fins de siécle. In Revue internationale d’action communautaire, n. 19.Google Scholar
  27. Roché, S. (2000). La théorie de la vitre cassée en France. Inciviltés et désordres public. Revue française de science politique, 50(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sabbadini, L. L., & Muratore, M. G. (2003). Fear of crime, in towards a safety society. In Atti della international conference on crime. Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
  29. Sen, A. K. (2001). Freedom, rationality, and social choice: The arrow lectures and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A. K. (2004). Rationality and freedom. Harvard: Harvard Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sen, A. K. (2010). The idea of justice. London: Harvard University Press/Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  32. Skogan, W. G. (1981). Issues in the measurement of victimisation. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. Skogan, W. G. (1987). The impact of victimization on fear. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. (1981). Coping with crime. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Stanko, E. A. (1990). When precaution is normal: A feminist critique of crime prevention. In Feminist perspectives in criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, R. B., & Hale, M. (1986). Testing alternative models of fear of crime. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 151–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tyler, T. R. (1980). Impact of directly and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgements and behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tyler, T. R. (1984). Assessing the risk of crime victimisation: The integration of personal victimisation experience and socially transmitted information. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Wurff, A., & Stringer, P. (1988). Measuring fear of crime in residential surroundings. In Environmental social psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandra Federici
    • 1
  • Maria Giuseppina Muratore
    • 1
  • Daria Squillante
    • 1
  1. 1.Italian National Institute of StatisticsRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations