Measuring Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being in Italy

Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 48)

Abstract

In recent years, a new movement aiming at measuring well-being is emerging following initiatives carried out by national and local political authorities, the research on the measurement of quality of life and happiness, and the initiatives undertaken by the OECD on measuring and fostering societal progress.

In this context, measuring national well-being and societal progress in Italy is one of the challenges that the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat) is called to face. Istat’s attention toward this issue has taken the form of a number of activities aimed at strengthening the ability of official statistics to measure specific dimensions of well-being. Such initiatives include objective and subjective measures of individual well-being, the strengthening of environmental measures and accounts, and the adaptation of macroeconomic aggregates to provide distributional information and to overcome GDP limitations in general.

In 2011, Istat together with the National Council for Economics and Labor (CNEL) started a national consultation to identify a shared set of indicators of the progress of the Italian society, thus having to provide a sufficient and robust statistical production as well as enhancing a democratic process able to grant legitimacy to the selected key indicators.

Keywords

Political Participation Disposable Income National Account Online Consultation Progress Indicator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Linda Laura Sabbadini for her contribution in systematization of the information comprised in paragraph 3 based on forthcoming position paper “La misurazione del progresso e del benessere nella società italiana: la posizione dell’Istat,” and Aldo Femia and Elisabetta Segre for their comments.

References

  1. Baldassarini, A., & Romano, M. C. (2006, 30 June–2 July). Non-market household work in national accounts. Paper presented at the 18th annual meeting on socio-economics, Trier, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Barroso, J. M. (2007). José Manuel Barroso (President of the European Commission), Beyond GDP international initiative, 2007, Opening speech. http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/proceedings/bgdp_proceedings_intro_ses1.pdf
  3. CAE and GCEE. (2011). Monitoring economic performance, quality of life and sustainability. Joint report as requested by the Franco-German Ministerial Council, Conseil des ministres franco-allemand, Fribourg-en Brisgau, 10 Dec 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Calzaroni, M. (2000). The exhaustiveness of production estimates: New concepts and methodologies. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/54/2464056.pdf
  5. DGINS ESSC. (2010). Sofia Memorandum. Measuring progress, well-being and sustainable development. http://www.dgins-sofia2010.eu/
  6. European Commission. (2009). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament - GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing world (COM/2009/0433 final).Google Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (2010). EU-SILC 2007 comparative EU final quality report version 2 – June 2010. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/dsis/eusilc/library?l=/quality_assessment/comparative_quality_1/quality_2007_version/_EN_1.0_a=d
  8. G20. (2009, September 24–25). Leaders’ statement: The Pittsburgh summit. http://www.pittsburghsummit.gov/mediacenter/129639.htm
  9. Hall, J., Giovannini, E., Morrone, A., & Ranuzzi, G. (2009). A framework to measure the progress of societies (Working Paper no. 34). Paris: OECD Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  10. Innes, J. (1990). Knowledge and public policy: The search for meaningful indicators (2nd ed.). New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. (2002). Measuring the non-observed economy. A handbook. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/20/1963116.pdf
  12. OECD. (2007, June 30). Istanbul declaration, Final declaration of the OECD 2nd world forum on “Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies”. Istanbul. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/46/38883774.pdf
  13. Rondinella, T., Segre, E., & Zola, D. (2011). L’indicatore di Qualità regionale dello sviluppo italiano (Quars) e altri casi studio internazionali. Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 1, 199–217. Ediesse, Roma.Google Scholar
  14. Scrivens, K., & Iasiello, B. (2010). Indicators of “societal progress”: Lessons from international experiences (OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2010/4). OECD Publishing. doi: http://10.1787/5km4k7mq49jg-en.Google Scholar
  15. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at: www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.President’s officeItalian National Institute of Statistics – ISTATRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations