Advertisement

Factors Affecting the Perception and Production of L2 Prosody: Research Results and Their Implications for the Teaching of Foreign Languages

  • Thorsten Piske
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 15)

Abstract

It is often assumed that a strong degree of foreign accent has negative effects on the intelligibility and social acceptance of utterances produced by second language (L2) learners. The degree of foreign accent perceived in the speech of L2 learners is not only determined by segmental errors i.e. by errors in the production of L2 consonants and vowels but also by suprasegmental errors, i.e., by errors in the production of prosodic aspects of speech such as intonation, rhythm or word stress. A third parameter contributing to the perception of a foreign accent in L2 speech is lack of fluency represented by pause and hesitation phenomena such as silent and filled pauses, repetitions, false starts and rate of speech. This chapter will look at different aspects of the phenomenon of foreign accent. It will first discuss attitudes of both native and non-native speakers towards foreign-accented speech. Next, the relative contribution of segmental parameters, prosodic parameters and fluency to the perception of foreign accents will be explored. The third section of this chapter will refer to previous research examining subject and phonetic variables that have been claimed to have a significant influence on degree of L2 foreign accent and it will discuss three types of reasons why it is still difficult to draw any stronger conclusions about the influence some of these variables have on the accuracy with which non-native speakers pronounce an L2. The chapter will be concluded by relating the results of previous foreign accent research to the foreign language classroom.

Keywords

Native Speaker Conversational Speech Foreign Accent Segmental Parameter Prosodic Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ayoama, Katsura, and Susan G. Guion. 2007. Prosody in second language acquisition. Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range. In Language experience in second language speech learning. In honor of James Emil Flege, ed. Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Murray J. Munro, 281–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  2. Bassetti, Benedetta. 2009. Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Input matters in SLA, ed. Thorsten Piske and Martha Young-Scholten, 191–206. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  3. Bohn, Ocke-Schwen, and Murray J. Munro, eds. 2007. Language experience in second language speech learning. In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  4. Bongaerts, Theo, Chantal van Summeren, Brigitte Planken, and Erik Schils. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham, Denis, Michael Tyler, and Stephanie Horlyck. 2002. Periods of speech perception development and their vestiges in adulthood. In An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode, ed. Petra Burmeister, Thorsten Piske, and Andreas Rohde, 281–300. Trier: WVT – Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, Yuko G. 2007. How are non-native-English-speaking teachers perceived by young learners? TESOL Quarterly 41: 731–755.Google Scholar
  7. Cargile, Aaron C. 1997. Attitudes towards Chinese-accented speech. An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16: 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derwing, Tracey M., and Murray J. Munro. 1997. Accent, intelligibility and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derwing, Tracey M., and Marian J. Rossiter. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13: 1–17.Google Scholar
  10. Derwing, Tracey M., Murray J. Munro, and Grace Wiebe. 1998. Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning 48: 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derwing, Tracey M., Murray J. Munro, Ronald I. Thomson, and Marian J. Rossiter. 2009. The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flege, James E. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 692–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flege, James E. 1987. A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics 8: 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flege, James E. 1998. The role of subject and phonetic variables in second language learning. In Papers from the 34th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. II, The panels, ed. M. Catherine Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth Olson, and Tamra Wysocki, 213–232. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  15. Flege, James E. 2009. Give input a chance! In Input matters in SLA, ed. Thorsten Piske and Martha Young-Scholten, 175–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. Flege, James E., and Serena Liu. 2001. The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 527–552.Google Scholar
  17. Flege, James E., Murray J. Munro, and Ian R.A. MacKay. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flege, James E., Grace H. Yeni-Komshian, and Hua Liu. 1999. Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flege, James E., David Birdsong, Ellen Bialystok, Molly Mack, Hyekyung Sung, and Kimiko Tsukada. 2006. Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics 34: 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grosjean, François. 2001. The bilingual’s language modes. In One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, ed. Janet L. Nicol, 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Guion, Susan G., James E. Flege, Serena H. Liu, and Grace H. Yeni-Komshian. 2000. Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 21: 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gut, Ulrike. 2003. Prosody in second language speech production: The role of the native language. Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen 32: 132–152.Google Scholar
  23. Gut, Ulrike. 2009. Non-native speech. A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Hahn, Laura D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38: 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamers, Josiane F., and Michel H.A. Blanc. 2000. Bilinguality and bilingualism, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen Edwards, Jette G., and Mary L. Zampini, eds. 2008. Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Hardison, Debra M. 2005. Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal 22: 175–190.Google Scholar
  28. Hieke, Adolf E. 1980. Aspects of native and non-native fluency skills. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  29. Jilka, Matthias. 2000. The contribution of intonation to the perception of a foreign accent, vol. 6, no. 3. University of Stuttgart: Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung (AIMS).Google Scholar
  30. Jilka, Matthias. 2002. Testing the contribution of prosody to the perception of a foreign accent. In New Sounds 2000. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on second-language speech, ed. Allan James and Jonathan Leather, 199–207, University of Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  31. Levi, Susannah V., Stephen J. Winters, and David B. Pisoni. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121: 2327–2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lléo, Conxita, and Irene Vogel. 2004. Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 phonology. The role of the Prosodic Hierarchy. International Journal of Bilingualism 8: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long, Michael H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Missaglia, Federica. 1999. Contrastive prosody in SLA – An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 1, 551–554, 1–7 Aug 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Missaglia, Federica. 2007. Prosodic training for adult Italian learners of German: The Contrastive Prosody Method. In Prosodic description and teaching practice, ed. Jürgen Trouvain and Ulrike Gut, 237–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moyer, Alene. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moyer, Alene. 2004. Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  38. Moyer, Alene. Forthcoming. Foreign accent: The phonology of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Munro, Murray J. 1998. The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Munro, Murray J., and Tracey M. Derwing. 1995a. Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munro, Murray J., and Tracey M. Derwing. 1995b. Processing time, accent and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 38: 289–306.Google Scholar
  42. Munro, Murray J., and Tracey M. Derwing. 1998. The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning 48: 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson, Gayle L. 1991. Effective teaching behavior for international teaching assistants. In Preparing the professoriate of tomorrow to teach: Selected readings in TA training, ed. Jody D. Nyquist, Robert D. Abbott, Donald H. Wulff, and Jo Sprague, 427–434. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
  44. Neufeld, Gerald G. 1978. On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review 34: 163–174.Google Scholar
  45. Oyama, Susan. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piske, Thorsten. 2008. Phonetic awareness, phonetic sensitivity and the second language learner. In Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd ed. Vol. 6, Knowledge about language, ed. Jasone Cenoz and Nancy H. Hornberger, 155–166. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Piske, Thorsten, James E. Flege, Ian R.A. Mackay, and Diane Meador. 1999. Non-natives’ production of vowels in conversational speech. Collected papers from the 137th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd convention of the European Acoustics Association: Forum Acusticum. Paper no. 2ASCB_4.Google Scholar
  48. Piske, Thorsten, Ian R.A. MacKay, and James E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Piske, Thorsten, James E. Flege, Ian R.A. Mackay, and Diane Meador. 2011. Investigating native and non-native vowels produced in conversational speech. In Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010, ed. Magdalena Wrembel, Malgorzata Kul, and Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, 195–205. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  50. Purcell, Edward T., and Richard W. Suter. 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A re-examination. Language Learning 30: 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schumann, John. 1975. Affective factors and the problem of age in second language acquisition. Language Learning 25: 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scovel, Thomas. 1969. Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance. Language Learning 19: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Settinieri, Julia. 2008. Teaching pronunciation. In Bielefeld introduction to applied linguistics: A course book, ed. Stephan Gramley and Vivian Gramley, 1–12. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag.Google Scholar
  54. Steinlen, Anja K. 2005. The influence of consonants on native and non-native vowel production: A cross-linguistic study. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, Irene. 1991. Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning 41: 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trofimovich, Pavel, Patsy M. Lightbown, Randall H. Halter, and Hyojin Song. 2008. Comprehension-based practice: The development of L2 pronunciation in a listening and reading program. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 609–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wennerstrom, Ann. 1998. Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Winitz, Harris, Brenda Gillespie, and Jennifer Starcev. 1995. The development of English speech patterns in a 7-year-old Polish-speaking child. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yule, George, and Doris Macdonald. 1994. The effects of pronunciation training. In Pronunciation pedagogy and theory: New views, new directions, ed. Joan Morley, 111–118. Alexandria: TESOL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lehrstuhl für, FremdsprachendidaktikFriedrich-Alexander-UniversitätNürnbergGermany

Personalised recommendations