Philanthropic Venture Capitalists’ Post-Investment Involvement with Portfolio Social Enterprises: What Do They Actually Do?

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter presents results from an empirical study concerning post-investment value-added services provided by philanthropic venture capitalists to their backed social enterprises. Results show that the most important activity consists in the provision of strategic advice for organizational development. Philanthropic venture capitalists act as advisors and mentors of social entrepreneurs. Also, findings show how important is facilitating access to future potential funders on the side of the social enterprise.

Keywords

Venture Capital Social Enterprise Social Entrepreneurship Social Entrepreneur Legal Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthurs, J.D., and L.W. Busenitz. 2003. The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 28(2): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J., H. Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 30(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, J. B., J.O. Fiet, L.W. Busenitz, and D.D. Moesel. 1996. The Substitution of bonding for monitoring in venture capitalist relations with high technology enterprises. Journal of High Technology Management Research 7(1): 91–105.Google Scholar
  4. Bello, Z. 2005. Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research 28(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brander, J., R. Amit, and W. Antweiler. 2002. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 11(3): 422–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bygrave, W.D. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 2(2): 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cable, D.M., and S. Shane. 1997. A Prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 142–176.Google Scholar
  8. CAN. 2011. www.can-online.org.uk. Accessed 17 Sept 2011.
  9. Certo, S.T., and T. Miller. 2008. Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons 51(4): 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chell, E., K. Nicolopoulou, and M. Karataş-Özkan. 2010. Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: International and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(6): 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dacin, P.A., M.T. Dacin, and M. Matear. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives 24(3): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dees, J.G. 1998. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 76(1): 54–67.Google Scholar
  13. Di Domenico, M., H. Haugh, and P. Tracey. 2010. Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 681–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57–74.Google Scholar
  15. Gorman, M., and W.A. Sahlman. 1989. What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing 4(4): 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gompers, P. 1995. Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital. Journal of Finance 50(5): 1461–1489.Google Scholar
  17. Hellmann, T., and M. Puri. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 57(1): 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. John, R. 2006. Venture philanthropy: The evolution of high engagement philanthropy in Europe. Oxford: Saïd Business School Publications.Google Scholar
  20. John, R. 2007. Beyond the cheque: how venture philanthropists add value. Skoll Center Working Paper. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, S.N., and P. Strömberg. 2001. Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. American Economic Review 91(2): 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kistruck, G.M., and P.W. Beamish. 2010. The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 735–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerner, J. 1994. The syndication of venture capital investments. FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association 23(3): 16–27.Google Scholar
  24. Letts, C., W. Ryan, and A. Grossman. 1997. Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review 75(2): 36–44.Google Scholar
  25. MacMillan, I., D. Kulow, and R. Khoylian. 1989. Venture capitalists’ involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing 4(1): 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mair, J., and I. Martí. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business 41(1): 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mair, J., and O. Schoen. 2005. Social entrepreneurial business models: An exploratory study. IESE business school working paper no. 610. Barcelona: IESE Business School.Google Scholar
  28. Meyskens, M., C. Robb-Post, J.A. Stamp, A.L. Carsrud, and P.D. Reynolds. 2010. Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mill, G.A. 2006. The financial performance of a socially responsible investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 63(2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, T.L., and C.L. Wesley II. 2010. Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists’ decision criteria. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 705–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moss, T.W., J.C. Short, G.T. Payne, and G.T. Lumpkin. 2011. Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 35(4): 805–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholls, A. 2010a. The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1): 70–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicholls, A. 2010b. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 611–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peredo, A.M., and M. McLean. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business 41(1): 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reis, T. 1999. Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenstein, J., A. Bruno, W.D. Bygrave, and N.T. Taylor. 1993. The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board. Journal of Business Venturing 8(2): 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sapienza, H., and J.A. Timmons. 1989. The roles of venture capitalists in new ventures: What determines their importance? Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management 74–78.Google Scholar
  38. Sapienza, H., and M.A. Korsgaard. 1996. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 544–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sapienza, H., M.A. Korsgaard, P.K. Goulet, and J.P. Hoogendam. 2000. Effects of agency risks and procedural justice on board processes in venture capital-backed firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12(4): 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scarlata, M.R. 2011. Philanthropic venture capital: An exploratory comparative study. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Scarlata, M.R., and L. Alemany. 2010. Deal structuring in philanthropic venture capital investments: Financing instrument, valuation and covenants. Journal of Business Ethics 95(1): 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scarlata, M.R., L. Alemany, and A. Zacharakis. 2012. Philanthropic Venture Capital: Venture Capital for Social Entrepreneurs?, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 8(4): 279–342.Google Scholar
  43. Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2005a. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons 48(3): 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2005b. Sustainable development, sustainable profit. European Business Forum 20: 49–53.Google Scholar
  45. Sethi, S.P. 2005. Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds – Because there is no better alternative. Journal of Business Ethics 56(2): 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sorenson, O., and T.E. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. The American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1546–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sparkes, R., and C.J. Cowton. 2004. The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Timmons, J.A., and W.D. Bygrave. 1986. Venture capital’s role in financing innovation for economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing 1(2): 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright, M., and A. Lockett. 2003. The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies 40(8): 2073–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zahra, S.A., E. Gedajlovic, D.O. Neubaum, and J.M. Shulman. 2009. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntrepreneurshipNewcastle University Business SchoolNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.ESADE Business SchoolUniversitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations