Multi-compartmental Models of Neurons

  • Upinder S. Bhalla


Electrical models of neurons are one of the rather rare cases in Biology where a concise quantitative theory accounts for a huge range of observations and works well to predict and understand physiological properties. The mark of a successful theory is that people take it for granted and use it casually. Single neuronal models are no longer remarkable: with the theory well in hand, most interesting questions using models have moved to the networks of neurons in which they are embedded, and the networks of signalling pathways that are in turn embedded in neurons. Nevertheless, good single-neuron models are still rather rare and valuable entities, and it is an important goal in neuroinformatics (and this chapter) to make their generation a well-tuned process.

The electrical properties of single neurons can be acurately modeled using multicompartmental modeling. Such models are biologically motivated and have a close correspondence with the underlying biophysical properties of neurons and their ion channels. These multicompartment models are also important as building blocks for detailed network models. Finally, the compartmental modeling framework is also well suited for embedding molecular signaling pathway models which are important for studying synaptic plasticity. This chapter introduces the theory and practice of multicompartmental modeling.


Neuronal Model Nernst Equation Passive Property Cable Equation Nernst Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Berridge MJ (2006) Calcium microdomains: organization and function. Cell Calcium 40(5–6):405–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bower JM, Beeman D (1995) The book of GENESIS. TELOS/Springer, Santa ClaraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnevale NT, Hines HML (2006) The NEURON book. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooley JW, Dodge FA (1966) Digital computer solutions for excitation and propagation of the nerve impulse. Biophys J 6(5):583–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornelis H, Rodriguez AL, Coop AD, Bower JM (2012) Python as a federation tool for GENESIS 3.0. PLoS One 7(1):e29018Google Scholar
  6. Crook S, Gleeson P, Howell F, Svitak J, Silver RA (2007) MorphML: level 1 of the NeuroML standards for neuronal morphology data and model specification. Neuroinformatics 5(2): 96–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eppler JM, Helias M, Muller E, Diesmann M, Gewaltig M (2008) PyNEST: a convenient interface to the NEST simulator. Front Neuroinformatics 2:12Google Scholar
  8. Fitzhugh R (1961) Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane. Biophys J 1(6):445–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 25:2340–2361Google Scholar
  10. Gleeson P, Steuber V, Silver RA (2007) NeuroConstruct: a tool for modeling networks of neurons in 3D space. Neuron 54(2):219–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hille B (1992) Ionic channels of excitable membranes. Sinauer Associates Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hines M (1984) Efficient computation of branched nerve equations. Int J Biomed Comput 15(1):69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952a) The components of membrane conductance in the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol (Lond) 116(4):473–496Google Scholar
  14. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952b) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol (Lond) 117(4):500–544Google Scholar
  15. Holt GR, Koch C (1999) Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies. J Comput Neurosci 6(2):169–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hursh J (1939) Conduction velocity and diameter of nerve fibers. Am J Physiol 127:131–139Google Scholar
  17. Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14: 1569–1572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jack JJB, Noble D, Tsien RW (1975) Electric current flow in excitable cells. Calderon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Lisman JE, Raghavachari S, Tsien RW (2007) The sequence of events that underlie quantal transmission at central glutamatergic synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(8):597–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Migliore M, Morse TM, Davison AP et al (2003) ModelDB: making models publicly accessible to support computational neuroscience. Neuroinformatics 1(1):135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagumo J, Arimoto S, Yoshizawa S (1962) An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon. Proc IRE 50:2061–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rall W (1959) Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity. Exp Neurol 1: 491–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rall W (1967) Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input. J Neurophysiol 30(5):1138–1168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rall W (1969) Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys J 9(12):1483–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ray S, Bhalla US (2008) PyMOOSE: Interoperable scripting in Python for MOOSE. Frontiers Neuroinformatics 2(6):1–16Google Scholar
  26. Rushton WAH (1951) A theory of the effects of fibre size in the medullated nerve. J Physiol 115(1):101–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sabatini BL, Oertner TG, Svoboda K (2002) The life cycle of Ca2+ions in dendritic spines. Neuron 33(3):439–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Segev I (2006) What do dendrites and their synapses tell the neuron? J Neurophysiol. 95(3):1295–1297Google Scholar
  29. Seyfarth E (2006) Julius Bernstein (1839–1917): pioneer neurobiologist and biophysicist. Biol Cybern 94(1):2–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevens CF (1993) Quantal release of neurotransmitter and long-term potentiation. Cell 72(Suppl):55–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Traub RD, Wong RK, Miles R, Michelson H (1991) A model of a CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neuron incorporating voltage-clamp data on intrinsic conductances. J Neurophysiol 66(2): 635–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Geit W, Achard P, De Schutter E (2007) Neurofitter: a parameter tuning package for a wide range of electrophysiological neuron models. Front Neuroinformatics 1:1Google Scholar
  33. Wils S, De Schutter E (2009) STEPS: modeling and simulating complex reaction–diffusion systems with Python. Front Neuroinformatics 3:15Google Scholar
  34. Yamada W, Koch C, Adams PR (1989) Multiple channels and calcium dynamics. In: Koch S (ed) Methods in neuronal modeling. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 97–133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Biological SciencesTIFRBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations