Skip to main content

Evaluating Sustainability: Is It Necessary, and Does It Pay?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability in the Chemical Industry

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1155 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainability is not necessary, as proven by the significant number of chemical companies that have declined to adopt it. However, for more developed-world, public chemical companies, at least some nod to sustainability is probably required. Sustainability’s return-on-investment’ is difficult to quantify, which is not the same as saying there is no ROI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hilger’s apparent disregard of public opinion was long-standing, and was shared by his predecessor, Rolf Sammet. Asked what he did during World War II at an early-1980s press briefing with British journalists, Sammet replied that he spent much of it bombing London.

  2. 2.

    Which were high emitters of N2O, one of the more potent greenhouse gases.

  3. 3.

    With terminator technology, GMOs terminate future generations, in that their seeds are genetically engineered to be sterile. This prevents a GMO from seeding a subsequent generation, thus protecting the natural environment from artificial genetic modification. GMO-opponents generally ignored this, pointing out that “terminated GMO” require farmers to buy seeds every year from Monsanto – alleged proof of its greed.

  4. 4.

    Robert Watson, who also was involved in the IPCC reports on climate change.

  5. 5.

    The European Chemical Industry Council, i.e. the trade association of manufacturers.

  6. 6.

    See http://www.eco-label.com/default.htm.

  7. 7.

    For instance, bribing to win government contracts, paying taxes in countries with lax enforcement or, in a merchant bank, strictly separating investment analysis and deal-making.

  8. 8.

    For instance, a “Sustainability Beyond Compliance in Chemicals” conference held in 2007 featured speakers from Akzo Nobel, BASF, Dow, DSM, Novamont, Rhodia, Solvay and Syngenta. http://www.jacobfleming.com/conferences/chemical/sustainability-beyond-compliance-in-chemicals#eve_inf.

  9. 9.

    In some of these cases, the commitment accounts for a significant amount of the company’s brand – so it is not completely altruistic.

References

  1. Steger et al (2005) Corporate license to operate – review of the literature and research options. Oliver Salzmann, Aileen Ionescu-Somers, Ulrich Steger. IMD. http://www01.imd.ch/documents/research/lto/LTOresreview.pdf

  2. Krisennavigator (1998) Frank Roselieb. Institut für Krisenforschung, Schauenburgerstraße 116 D-24118 Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  3. KPMG & SustainAbility (2007) Count me in: the readers’ take on sustainability reporting

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenpeace (2001) UK government report on PVC misses the point, but still condemns PVC windows and floors. http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/press-releases/uk-government-report-on-pvc-misses-the-point-but-still-condemns-pvc-windows-and-floors

  5. Natural Resources Defense Council (1999) Preventing industrial pollution at its source: a final report of the Michigan Source Reduction Initiative. http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/msri/msriinx.asp

  6. Moberg (2002) Erin Brokovich doesn’t live here: environmental politics and‚ responsible care’ in mobile county, Alabama. Human Organization, Winter 2002. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3800/is_200201/ai_n9025846/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1

  7. Washington Post (1999) Crop busters take on Monsanto: backlash against biotech foods exacts a high price. Justin Gillis and Anne Swardson, 27 Oct 1999. http://www.biotech-info.net/crop_busters.html

  8. Wall Street Journal (2000) Tilling the middle ground: consultant brings environmentalists and executives together. Konstantin Richter, 23 Mar 2000. http://www.johnelkington.com/profile-wsj.htm

  9. Guardian (1999) GM food: special report. John Vidal Guardian (London), Saturday 9 Oct 1999

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chemistry & Industry (2008) Syngenta unlikely to rejoin Ag assessment. Marina Murphy, 25 Feb 2008

    Google Scholar 

  11. PEP Review (2000–2010) Impact of the EU’s REACH chemicals policy

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenpeace (2006) Toxic Lobby: how the chemicals industry is trying to kill REACH. Greenpeace, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, Milton Friedman. New York Times Magazine (September):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vafeas N, Nikolaou V (2001) The association between corporate environmental and financial performance. Adv Public Int Account 8:195–214

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Sustainable Company (2003) Chris Laszlo, Island Press. ISBN 1 55963 836 2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Johnson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, E. (2012). Evaluating Sustainability: Is It Necessary, and Does It Pay?. In: Sustainability in the Chemical Industry. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3834-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics