Abstract
As I am not a specialist in the subject matter of Holger Lyre’s paper,1 I had to learn from him that there are two different approaches to structural realism in the literature, the “Worrall-type” and the “French-Ladyman-type” approach, as he calls them.2 The Worrall-type approach is a reaction to the difficulties that emerged in the defence of entity realism against various objections, especially against the well-known pessimistic meta-induction.3 In contrast, the French-Ladyman-type approach tries “to present arguments from the sciences directly, more precisely from the way modern science, notably physics, informs us about the ontology of the world”.4 Thus, it seems to be the much more straightforward approach to structural realism, avoiding the detour of getting involved in a rather convoluted discussion. In the following, I shall present two critical remarks on this approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2012). Santa’s Gift of Structural Realism. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Stöltzner, M., Weber, M. (eds) Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3029-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3030-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)